2024년 6월 9일 일요일

The Zone of Interest (film) - Wikipedia

The Zone of Interest (film) - Wikipedia

The Zone of Interest (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Zone of Interest
U.S. theatrical release poster
Directed byJonathan Glazer
Written byJonathan Glazer
Based onThe Zone of Interest
by Martin Amis
Produced by
Starring
CinematographyŁukasz Żal
Edited byPaul Watts
Music byMica Levi
Production
companies
Distributed by
  • A24 (United States and United Kingdom)
  • Gutek Film (Poland)[1]
Release dates
  • 19 May 2023 (Cannes)
  • 15 December 2023 (United States)
  • 2 February 2024 (United Kingdom)
  • 9 February 2024 (Poland)
Running time
105 minutes[2]
Countries
Languages
  • German
  • Polish
  • Yiddish
Box office$50.2 million[6][7]

The Zone of Interest is a 2023 historical drama film written and directed by Jonathan Glazer, co-produced among the United Kingdom, the United States, and Poland. Loosely based on the 2014 novel by Martin Amis, the film focuses on the life of Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höss and his wife Hedwig, who live with their family in a home in the "Zone of Interest" next to the concentration camp. Christian Friedel stars as Rudolf Höss alongside Sandra Hüller as Hedwig Höss.[3]

Development of the film began in 2014 around the publication of the Amis novel, which is itself based partially on real events. Glazer opted to tell the story of the Hösses rather than the characters they inspired and conducted extensive research into the family, as he sought to make a film that demystifies the perpetrators of the Holocaust as "mythologically evil". The project was formally announced in 2019, with A24 confirmed to distribute the film. Filming took place primarily around the Auschwitz concentration camp in summer 2021. Additional shots were taken in Jelenia Góra in January 2022.[8]

The Zone of Interest premiered at the 76th Cannes Film Festival on 19 May 2023 and was theatrically released in the United States on 15 December 2023. The film received critical acclaim with praise towards Glazer's direction and script, the minimalist use of music, sound design, cinematography, experimental narrative and atmosphere. Among its accolades, The Zone of Interest received five nominations (including Best Picture) at the 96th Academy Awards, winning two: Best International Feature (the first for a non-English British film) and Best Sound.[9] The film also won the Grand Prix at Cannes and three British Academy Film Awards, including Best Film Not in the English Language;[10] received three nominations at the Golden Globe Awards; and was named one of the top five international films of 2023 by the National Board of Review.

Plot[edit]

In 1943, Rudolf Höss, commandant of the Auschwitz concentration camp, lives with his wife Hedwig and their five children in an idyllic home next to the camp. Höss takes the children out to swim and fish, and Hedwig spends time tending the garden. Locals handle the chores, and the murdered Jews' belongings are given to the family. Beyond the garden wall, gunshots, shouting, and the sounds of trains and furnaces are audible.

Höss approves the design of a new crematorium created by Topf and Sons. One day, he notices human remains in the river and gets his children out of the water where they have been playing. He also sends a message to SS personnel, chastising them for their carelessness in “picking lilacs”, causing “bleeding”. At night, while Höss reads the German fairytale of "Hansel and Gretel" to his daughters, a Polish girl sneaks out and hides food at the prisoners' work sites.

Hedwig's mother comes to stay, and Höss receives word that he is being promoted to deputy inspector of concentration camps and must move to Oranienburg, near Berlin. He objects, and withholds the news from Hedwig for several days. Hedwig asks him to convince his superiors to let her and the children remain in their home; the request is approved. Before Höss leaves, a woman comes to his office and prepares herself for sex. Meanwhile, the Polish girl finds sheet music composed by a prisoner, which she plays on the piano at her home. Hedwig's mother departs unannounced after seeing the burning crematorium at night. She leaves a note that upsets Hedwig.

In Berlin, in recognition of his work, Höss is tasked by Oswald Pohl with heading an operation named after him that will transport 700,000 Hungarian Jews to work at the camps or to be killed. This will allow him to move back to Auschwitz and reunite with his family. He vacantly attends a party organised by the SS Main Economic and Administrative Office. Afterwards, he tells Hedwig over the phone that he spent his time at the party thinking about the most efficient way to gas the attendees.

As Höss leaves his Berlin office and descends a stairway, he stops, retches repeatedly and stares into the darkness of the building corridors. In the present day, a group of janitors cleans the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum. Back in 1944, Höss continues downstairs, descending into darkness.

Cast[edit]

Production[edit]

Development[edit]

Clockwise: writer-director Jonathan Glazer, novelist Martin Amis, and actors Sandra Hüller and Christian Friedel

Development of The Zone of Interest began in 2014.[11] After completing Under the Skin, Glazer came across a newspaper preview of the then-upcoming Martin Amis novel The Zone of Interest and became intrigued. He optioned the novel after reading it. Paul and Hannah Doll, the novel's two main characters, were loosely based on Rudolf Höss, the longest-serving commandant of Auschwitz concentration camp, and his wife Hedwig. Glazer opted to use the historical figures instead and conducted two years of extensive research into the Hösses.[12] He made several visits to Auschwitz and was profoundly affected by the sight of the Höss residence, which was separated from the camp by a mere garden wall.[13] He collaborated with the Auschwitz Museum and other organisations, and obtained special permission to access the archives, where he examined testimonies provided by survivors and individuals who had been employed in the Höss household. By piecing together these testimonies, Glazer gradually constructed a detailed portrayal of the individuals connected to the events.[14][15] He also consulted historian Timothy Snyder's 2015 book Black Earth: The Holocaust as History and Warning during his research.[12]

Glazer wished to make a film that demystifies the perpetrators of the Holocaust, which he noted are often portrayed as "almost mythologically evil". He sought to tell the story of the Holocaust not "as something safely in the past", but "a story of the here and now".[11][16] He compared his approach to the writing of philosopher Gillian Rose, who envisioned a film "that could make us feel 'unsafe', by showing how we're emotionally and politically closer to the perpetrator culture than we'd like to think" and a film seen through the "dry eyes of grief" that is unsentimental and "forensic".[17]

Glazer confirmed development of the project in 2019, with A24, Film4, Access Entertainment and House Productions co-financing and producing.[18][19] Friedel first met Glazer and producer James Wilson in London in 2019 for the role of Rudolf Höss. Despite his own unwillingness to play Nazi figures, he was intrigued by Glazer's approach, which aimed to "give this monstrous person a human face”.[citation needed]

Friedel recommended Hüller for the role of Rudolf's wife Hedwig, having first met her in 2013 while acting together in the historical drama Amour Fou.[16][20] Hüller was first sent an excerpt of the script, an argument between Rudolf and Hedwig presented out of context, before learning the project's nature as a film about the Holocaust. Although she had resolved never to play a Nazi, Hüller was convinced after reading the full script and meeting with Glazer, believing that he shared and addressed her concerns about how to properly depict Nazism on screen. Hüller's own dog, a black Weimeraner, plays Dilla, the Höss family dog in the film.[21]

The young Polish girl in the film is inspired by Aleksandra Bystroń-Kołodziejczyk, whom Glazer met during his research. As a 12-year-old member of the Polish Home Army, she used to cycle to the camp to leave apples for the starving prisoners. As in the film, she discovered a piece of music written by a prisoner. The prisoner, Joseph Wulf, worked at Auschwitz III–Monowitz. He survived the camp and was one of the first people to document the atrocities of the Holocaust, a cause to which he dedicated his life. Bystroń-Kołodziejczyk died shortly after she met Glazer. The bike the film uses and the dress the actress wears both belonged to her.[11][22] Glazer dedicated the film to her while accepting the award for Best International Feature Film at the 96th Academy Awards.[23]

Filming[edit]

Front façade of the former house of Rudolf Höß next to the Auschwitz concentration camp (photo taken in 2012).

The original Höss house has been a private residence since the end of the war.[12] Wear and tear in the subsequent eight decades made it a poor location for the shoot, which required the house to appear brand new. Production designer Chris Oddy ultimately chose a derelict building a few hundred yards away, built after the war but in a similar architectural style.[16] He spent several months converting the home into a replica of the Höss residence, and started planting the garden in April 2021 so that it would be in bloom when filming began.[12] As the camp buildings have aged significantly over the years, they were recreated through the use of computer-generated graphics.[24] Principal photography began around Auschwitz in summer 2021 and lasted approximately 55 days.[12][13] Additional filming took place in Jelenia Góra in January 2022.[8]

The film was shot on Sony Venice digital cameras equipped with Leica lenses.[25] Glazer and cinematographer Łukasz Żal embedded up to 10 cameras in and around the house and kept them running simultaneously, with no crew on set. Żal and his team were stationed in the basement, while Glazer and the rest of the crew were in a container on the other side of the wall, away from the actors. Each take would last 10 minutes. The approach, which Glazer dubbed "Big Brother in the Nazi house", allowed the actors to improvise and experiment extensively during filming.[12][13][15][16] Glazer and Żal aimed for a modern look and did not wish to "aesthetize" Auschwitz. As a result, only practical and natural lighting was used.[26] The nighttime sequences involving the Polish girl, where there was no natural light available, were shot using a forward-looking infrared camera provided by the Polish military. The low-resolution thermal imagery was then upscaled using AI during post-production.[22][16]

The former house of Rudolf Höß next to Auschwitz concentration camp. This side entrance gives onto the gate leading to the camp (photo taken in 2024).

Glazer did not want the atrocities occurring inside the camp to be seen, only heard. He described the film's sound as "the other film" and "arguably, the film".[13] To that end, sound designer Johnnie Burn compiled a 600-page document containing relevant events at Auschwitz, testimonies from witnesses, and a large map of the camp so that the distance and echoes of the sounds could be properly determined.[27] He spent a year building a sound library before filming began, which included sounds of manufacturing machinery, crematoria, furnaces, boots, period-accurate gunfire and human sounds of pain. He continued building the library well into the shoot and post-production.[28][29] As many of the new arrivals at Auschwitz at the time were French, Burn sourced their voices from protests and riots in Paris in 2022. The sounds of drunken Auschwitz guards were sourced at the Reeperbahn in Hamburg.[30]

English musician Mica Levi wrote a score, most of which was ultimately cut as Glazer and Burn did not want to have the film sweetened or dramatized by it. The sound collages Levi wrote for the prologue and the epilogue remained, as did soundscapes created for the sequences involving the Polish girl.[31] The compositions combine human voices with a synthesizer, which Levi described as a pairing of "the oldest, most primordial instrument" with "the most modern".[16]

Release[edit]

The cast and team at the film's Gala Premiere at the 2023 BFI London Film Festival.

The Zone of Interest was selected to compete for the Palme d'Or at the 2023 Cannes Film Festival,[32] where it had its world premiere on 19 May,[33] and received a six-minute standing ovation.[34] It won the Grand Prix, the Cannes Soundtrack Award, and the FIPRESCI Prize.[35][36][37]

The North American premiere was held on 1 September 2023, at the 50th Telluride Film Festival.[38][39] The Zone of Interest was also screened at the 2023 Toronto International Film Festival.[40] In the US, after being delayed from its initial release date of 8 December,[41] The Zone of Interest had a limited theatrical release on 15 December.[42] It was released in the UK on 2 February 2024,[43] and released in Poland a week later on 9 February.[44] It was released for digital platforms on February 20.[45]

Jonathan Glazer's acceptance speech at the 96th Academy Awards[edit]

The film's release coincided with the ongoing War between Israel and Hamas, leading to its director, producer and other commentators to draw analogies between them. In his Oscar acceptance speech at the 96th Academy Awards, Glazer said The Zone of Interest shows where dehumanisation leads at its worst, stating that: "Right now, we stand here as men who refute their Jewishness and the Holocaust being hijacked by an occupation which has led to conflict for so many innocent people". He expressed criticism, as a Jewish person, by referring to the dehumanisation of both the "victims of October the 7th in Israel" and "the ongoing attack on Gaza".[46][47]

Glazer's speech led to a significant reaction in the news media, especially due to a widely circulated misquotation which stated that Glazer had simply refuted his Jewishness, rather than refuting said Jewishness "being hijacked by an occupation."[48] Producer James Wilson said at the British Academy Film Awards: "I had a friend that texted me the other day, he said he couldn’t stop thinking about the walls we build in our daily lives that we don’t choose... There’s obviously things going on in the world, in Gaza, that remind us starkly of the sort of selective empathy, that there seems to be groups of innocent people being killed that we care about less than other innocent people."[49] Critic David Klion wrote that watching the film "...as U.S.-made bombs rained down on civilian neighborhoods in Gaza, I couldn’t help but dwell on the banal acceptance of these mass civilian casualties that I’ve witnessed closer to home."[50]

On March 18, an open letter denouncing the speech as blood libel signed by more than 450 "Jewish creatives, executives and Hollywood professionals" including Amy Pascal, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Gary Gilbert, Rod Lurie and Michael Rapaport was released.[51]

On April 5, weeks after the denouncement letter was released, a second open letter in defence and praise of Glazer was signed by over 150 Jewish creatives in the film industry. Eventually, over 450 Jewish creatives signed this letter. Among them were Joaquin Phoenix, Joel Coen, David Cross, Boots Riley, Elliott Gould, Chloe Fineman, Hari Nef, and Wallace Shawn.[52] Playwrights Tony Kushner and Zoe Kazan were among the speech's earlier supporters.[53][54][55]

Reception[edit]

Box office[edit]

As of March 25, 2024, The Zone of Interest has grossed $8.6 million in the United States and Canada, and $31.8 million in other territories, for a total worldwide gross of $40.3 million.[6][7]

In its opening weekend in the United States, the film made $124,000 from four theatres.[56] Following its five Oscar nominations, it expanded from 215 theatres to 333 in its seventh week of release and made $1.08 million, an increase of 141% from the previous weekend, and a running total of $3 million.[57]

Critical response[edit]

The Zone of Interest premiered to critical acclaim.[a] On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, 93% of 333 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 8.7/10. The website's critics consensus states, "Dispassionately examining the ordinary existence of people complicit in horrific crimes, The Zone of Interest forces us to take a cold look at the mundanity behind an unforgivable brutality."[65] On Metacritic, the film has a weighted average score of 92 out of 100, based on 58 critic reviews, indicating "universal acclaim".[66]

Kevin Maher of The Times called it a "landmark movie, hugely important, that's unafraid of difficult ideas".[67] David Rooney of The Hollywood Reporter called it a "devastating Holocaust drama like no other, which demonstrates with startling effectiveness [director Jonathan Glazer]'s unerring control of tonal and visual storytelling".[68] Donald Clarke of The Irish Times wrote, "Glazer may yet get in some trouble for taking such a formal approach to sensitive material. But, if anything, that self-imposed discipline – and utter lack of sentimentality – speaks to the profound respect he has for the subject."[69] Raphael Abraham of the Financial Times wrote, "Glazer has achieved something much greater than just making the monstrous mundane — by rendering such extreme inhumanity ordinary he reawakens us to its true horror."[70] Jonathan Romney of Screen International wrote that the film "eschews false rhetoric, leaving maximum space for the audience's imaginative and emotional response".[71]

David Ehrlich of IndieWire praised Glazer's camera process for instilling "a flattening evenness into a film where the lack of drama becomes deeply sickening unto itself".[72] Robbie Collin of The Daily Telegraph wrote, "Through painstaking framing and sound design, its horrors gnaw at the edge of every shot."[73] In a four-star review, Peter Bradshaw of The Guardian called it "a film which for all its artistry is perhaps not entirely in control of its (intentional) bad taste", while also praising the "superb score by Mica Levi and sound design by Johnnie Burn".[74]

Writing for Worldcrunch, the German critic Hanns-Georg Rodek wrote: "Here's the first question The Zone of Interest doesn't answer: [is it a film that showcases] ignorance? Of course it isn't. [Does it show] conscious approval based on racist and nationalist delusion? I'm sure it [does]. Is it longing for an idyll in the midst of a situation perceived as threatening? Without a doubt. There are many attempts at an explanation, but they don't really interest Jonathan Glazer. Glazer describes the situation in what is possibly more oppressive than anything we've seen in Holocaust films before. It concentrates in one garden the attitude of an entire nation that wanted to know nothing."[75]

Conversely, the Italian film critic Davide Abbatescianni's review published by Cineuropa was less positive. He criticised the film for its disturbing atmosphere, which he found to be well-crafted but monotonous, and for the performances, which he felt could not bring any change to the concept presented in a film that he thought lacked variety and remained stagnant for two hours.[76] Richard Brody from The New Yorker wrote "the movie is an extreme form of Holokitsch; it's this year's Jojo Rabbit."[77] Among the other rare negative reviews, Les Cahiers du Cinéma, found, "The problem is not only the weakness of (the film's) formal lurches, which are much more derisory than those of Under The Skin, and remain here at the stage of mannerisms (why dispense them in such a furtive manner, if not to frustrate needlessly?). It’s also that this fantastic idea of off-camera poisoning the frame without ever showing the forbidden image ends up running empty and looking at itself."[78] "After largely ecstatic reviews in the English-speaking world, German audiences have been more ambivalent about Jonathan Glazer’s film", commented The Irish Times.[79] Writing for the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, however, Andreas Klib stated that "Here the camera repeatedly jumps over the axis between the characters -a deadly sin in illusion cinema- to show the back of the event. Because we are not supposed to take part in it, but rather pay attention to details: the clouds of steam from a locomotive on the horizon. The smoke rising from the crematorium into the evening air. The reddish glow of the night sky. The ash that fertilizes the rose beds. At Cannes, where “The Zone of Interest” won the Grand Jury Prize, some critics criticized the film for its lack of storytelling. But that's exactly the point of Glazer's film: it doesn't paint a story, but a world."[80]

Additional reactions[edit]

The film was publicly praised by many filmmakers, including Steven Spielberg who said The Zone of Interest was the best film about the Holocaust since his film Schindler's List (1993), "It's doing a lot of good work in raising awareness, especially about the banality of evil."[81][82] Alfonso Cuarón described The Zone of Interest as "probably the most important film in this century."[83]

In a Variety essay expressing his admiration for the film Todd Field wrote:

"For those familiar with Glazer's films it's no surprise his approach here is unencumbered by tropes, genre conceits, or the cinematic shorthand we often take for granted. Over his twenty-four-year career as one of our finest filmmakers, Glazer has consistently executed high-wire interpretations of genre, and in the process completely reinvented them: crime (Sexy Beast), the paranormal (Birth), science fiction (Under the Skin). His pictures within these frames are mind-blowingly unique, as if he’d never seen anything that had been done before. The Zone of Interest is just as enigmatic and urgent. For we live in a time fraught with all kinds of walls used to ghettoize the other. A paradise from which it feels harder and harder to escape. Glazer’s art drives us to a place where we have no choice but to try."[84]

Upon its release in Japan on 24 May 2024, video game designer Hideo Kojima hailed the work, "The sounds that plead to the audience through the wall and the torture of deliberately not showing anything at all are used to draw images from the audience's minds. The film tests your 'zone of interest' and paradoxically questions the present's fading memory of the Holocaust."[85]

Accolades[edit]

AwardDate of ceremonyCategoryRecipient(s)ResultRef.
AARP Movies for Grownups Awards17 January 2024Best Foreign Language FilmThe Zone of InterestWon[86]
[87]
Academy Awards10 March 2024Best PictureJames WilsonNominated[88]
Best DirectorJonathan GlazerNominated
Best Adapted ScreenplayNominated
Best International Feature FilmUnited KingdomWon
Best SoundTarn Willers and Johnnie BurnWon
Alliance of Women Film Journalists4 January 2024Best FilmThe Zone of InterestWon[89]
Best DirectorJonathan GlazerNominated
Best Actress in a Supporting RoleSandra HüllerNominated
Most Daring PerformanceNominated
Best Screenplay, AdaptedJonathan GlazerNominated
Best CinematographyLukasz ZalNominated
Best EditingPaul WattsNominated
Best Non-English-Language FilmThe Zone of InterestWon
Astra Film Awards6 January 2024Best International FeatureThe Zone of InterestNominated[90]
Best International FilmmakerJonathan GlazerNominated
Best International ActorChristian FriedelNominated
Austin Film Critics Association Awards10 January 2024Best International FilmThe Zone of InterestNominated[91]
British Academy Film Awards18 February 2024Outstanding British FilmWon[92]
Best Film Not in the English LanguageWon
Best DirectorJonathan GlazerNominated
Best Adapted ScreenplayNominated
Best Actress in a Supporting RoleSandra HüllerNominated
Best CinematographyLukasz ZalNominated
Best EditingPaul WattsNominated
Best Production DesignChris OddyNominated
Best SoundJohnnie Burn & Tarn WillersWon
Boston Society of Film Critics Awards10 December 2023Best FilmThe Zone of InterestRunner-up[93]
Best DirectorJonathan GlazerWon
Best Adapted ScreenplayWon
Best Original ScoreMica LeviRunner-up
Best Foreign Language FilmThe Zone of InterestWon
Camerimage18 November 2023FIPRESCI AwardWon[94]
Cannes Film Festival27 May 2023Palme d'OrJonathan GlazerNominated[32]
Grand PrixWon[35]
FIPRESCI PrizeWon[37]
Soundtrack AwardMica LeviWon[36]
CST Artist-Technician AwardJohnnie BurnWon[95]
Chicago Film Critics Association Awards12 December 2023Best Supporting ActressSandra HüllerNominated[96]
Best Adapted ScreenplayJonathan GlazerNominated
Best Original ScoreMica LeviNominated
Best CinematographyŁukasz ŻalNominated
Best Foreign Language FilmThe Zone of InterestWon
Critics' Choice Movie Awards14 January 2024Best Foreign Language FilmNominated[97]
Dallas–Fort Worth Film Critics AssociationDecember 18, 2023Best Foreign Language FilmSecond[98]
Russell Smith AwardWon
Denver Film Critics Society12 January 2024Best Original ScoreMica LeviNominated[99]
Best Non-English Language FeatureThe Zone of InterestWon[b]
European Film Awards9 December 2023Best European FilmNominated[100]
Best European DirectorJonathan GlazerNominated
Best European ScreenwriterNominated
Best European ActorChristian FriedelNominated
Best European ActressSandra HüllerNominated
Best European Sound DesignerJohnnie Burn & Tarn WillersWon[101]
Florida Film Critics Circle AwardsDecember 21, 2023Best DirectorJonathan GlazerNominated[102]
[103]
Best Foreign Language FilmThe Zone of InterestRunner-up
Best Art Direction / Production DesignNominated
Best CinematographyŁukasz ŻalNominated
Cinema for Peace AwardsFebruary 19, 2024Most Valuable Film of the Year 2024Jonathan GlazerWon[104]
Georgia Film Critics Association Awards5 January 2024Best Original ScoreMica LeviNominated[105]
[106]
Best International FilmThe Zone of InterestNominated
Golden Globe Awards7 January 2024Best Motion Picture – DramaNominated[107]
Best Picture – Non-English LanguageNominated
Best Original ScoreMica LeviNominated
Golden Reel Awards3 March 2024Outstanding Achievement in Sound Editing – Foreign Language FeatureJohnnie Burn, Simon Carroll, Max Behrens, Joe Mount, Brendan Feeney, Ewa Mazurkiewicz, Natalia Lubowiecka, Dawid Konecki, Kamil KwiatkowskiNominated[108]
Gotham Independent Film Awards27 November 2023Best International FeatureThe Zone of InterestNominated[109]
Best ScreenplayJonathan GlazerNominated
Outstanding Supporting PerformanceSandra HüllerNominated
Hollywood Music in Media Awards15 November 2023Best Original Score — Independent FilmMica LeviWon[110]
Houston Film Critics Society22 January 2024Best Foreign Language FeatureThe Zone of InterestWon[111]
[112]
Independent Spirit Awards25 February 2024Best International FilmNominated[113]
Indiana Film Journalists Association17 December 2023Best Foreign Language FilmWon[114]
[115]
Best CinematographyŁukasz ŻalNominated
IndieWire Critics PollDecember 11, 2023Best FilmThe Zone of Interest6th Place[116]
Best DirectorJonathan Glazer3rd Place
Best Screenplay9th Place[c]
Best CinematographyŁukasz Żal4th Place
Best International FilmThe Zone of Interest2nd Place
Kansas City Film Critics Circle27 January 2024Best Foreign Language FilmRunner-up[117]
Las Vegas Film Critics Society13 December 2023Best International FilmNominated[118]
Los Angeles Film Critics Association Awards10 December 2023Best FilmWon[119]
Best DirectorJonathan GlazerWon
Best Lead PerformanceSandra HüllerWon[d]
Best MusicMica LeviWon
Montclair Film Festival29 October 2023Breakthrough Performer AwardChristian FriedelWon[121]
National Board of Review6 December 2023Top Five International FilmsThe Zone of InterestWon[e][122]
[123]
National Society of Film Critics6 January 2024Best DirectorJonathan GlazerWon[124]
Best ActressSandra HüllerWon[f][124]
Best FilmThe Zone of InterestRunner-up[124]
Best CinematographyŁukasz ŻalRunner-up[124]
North Texas Film Critics Association18 December 2023Best Foreign Language FilmThe Zone of InterestNominated[125]
Oklahoma Film Critics CircleJanuary 3, 2024Top 10 Films6th Place[126]
Best Foreign Language FilmWon
Best Body of WorkSandra HüllerWon[f]
Producers Guild of America Awards25 February 2024Outstanding Producer of Theatrical Motion PicturesThe Zone of InterestNominated[127]
San Diego Film Critics Society19 December 2023Best Supporting ActressSandra HüllerNominated[128]
Best Adapted ScreenplayJonathan GlazerNominated
Best Foreign Language FilmThe Zone of InterestRunner-up[g]
Best Sound DesignWon
San Francisco Bay Area Film Critics Circle AwardsJanuary 9, 2024Best FilmNominated[129]
Best DirectorJonathan GlazerWon
Best Supporting ActressSandra HüllerNominated
Best AdaptedJonathan GlazerNominated
Best International Feature FilmThe Zone of InterestWon
Best CinematographyŁukasz ŻalNominated
Best Film EditingPaul WattsWon
Best Original ScoreMica LeviNominated
Satellite Awards18 February 2024Best DirectorJonathan GlazerNominated[130]
Best Screenplay, AdaptedJonathan Glazer and Martin AmisNominated
Best Motion Picture – InternationalThe Zone of InterestWon
Seattle Film Critics Society Awards8 January 2024Best Picture of the YearNominated[131]
Best Actress in a Supporting RoleSandra HüllerNominated
Best International FilmThe Zone of InterestNominated
Best CinematographyŁukasz ŻalNominated
Best Original ScoreMica LeviNominated
Society of Composers & Lyricists23 February 2024Outstanding Original Score for an Independent FilmMica LeviNominated[132]
Southeastern Film Critics AssociationDecember 18, 2023Top 10 FilmsThe Zone of Interest10th Place[133]
St. Louis Film Critics Association17 December 2023Best FilmThe Zone of InterestNominated[134]
Best International FilmRunner-up
Best Adapted ScreenplayJonathan GlazerNominated
Best CinematographyŁukasz ŻalNominated
Best ScoreMica LeviNominated
Vancouver Film Critics Circle12 February 2024Best PictureThe Zone of InterestNominated[135]
Best DirectorJonathan GlazerNominated
Best International Film in a Non-English LanguageThe Zone of InterestWon
Toronto Film Critics Association17 December 2023Best PictureWon[136]
Best DirectorJonathan GlazerWon
Best International FeatureThe Zone of InterestRunner-up[h]
Washington D.C. Area Film Critics Association Awards10 December 2023Best Foreign Language FilmNominated[137]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Attributed to multiple references:[58][59][60][61][62][63][64]
  2. ^ Tied with Godzilla Minus One.
  3. ^ Tied with Greta Gerwig and Noah Baumbach for Barbie.
  4. ^ Awarded for both The Zone of Interest and Anatomy of a Fall. Shared with Emma Stone for Poor Things.[120]
  5. ^ This award does not have a single winner, but recognizes multiple films.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b Also for Anatomy of a Fall.
  7. ^ Shared with Godzilla Minus One.
  8. ^ Shared with Anatomy of a Fall.

References[edit]

  1. ^ Roxborough, Scott (26 May 2023). "Cannes: A24 Closes Worldwide Deals for Jonathan Glazer's 'The Zone of Interest'". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on 8 June 2023. Retrieved 8 June 2023.
  2. ^ "The Zone of Interest (12A)". British Board of Film Classification. 7 November 2023. Archived from the original on 8 November 2023. Retrieved 8 November 2023.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c "THE ZONE OF INTEREST". Festival de Cannes. Archived from the original on 27 May 2023. Retrieved 7 May 2023.
  4. ^ Vourlias, Christopher (19 May 2023). "Poles Share Their Souls With the World". Variety. Archived from the original on 27 May 2023. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
  5. ^ Film at Lincoln Center
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b "The Zone of Interest". Box Office Mojo. IMDb. Retrieved 31 March 2024.Edit this at Wikidata
  7. ^ Jump up to:a b "The Zone of Interest". The Numbers. Archived from the original on 27 January 2024. Retrieved 26 March 2024.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b "Filmowcy w Cieplicach. Trwają zdjęcia do filmu -Strefa Interesów-" [Filmmakers in Cieplice. Shooting for the film -The Zone of Interest- is in progress]. 24jgora.pl. 23 January 2022. Archived from the original on 28 November 2022. Retrieved 28 November 2022.
  9. ^ "'Godzilla Minus One' Makes VFX Oscar History As Record Number Of Non-English Language Movies Take Home Oscar Statuettes". 11 March 2024.
  10. ^ "BAFTA Awards: Best Film Not In English For Auschwitz Drama 'The Zone Of Interest'". Outlook India. 18 February 2024. Retrieved 18 February 2024.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c O'Hagan, Sean (10 December 2023). "Jonathan Glazer on his holocaust film The Zone of Interest: 'This is not about the past, it's about now'". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 20 December 2023. Retrieved 21 December 2023.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Harvey, Giles (19 December 2023). "How Do You Make a Movie About the Holocaust?". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 21 December 2023. Retrieved 21 December 2023.
  13. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Salisbury, Mark (27 November 2023). "Jonathan Glazer on 'The Zone Of Interest': "I wanted to remove the artifice of filmmaking"". Screen Daily. Archived from the original on 4 December 2023. Retrieved 21 December 2023.
  14. ^ Ntim, Zac; D'Alessandro, Anthony (20 May 2023). "Jonathan Glazer On His Holocaust Pic 'Zone Of Interest' & The Dangers Of Far-Right Resurgence Today". Deadline. Archived from the original on 27 May 2023. Retrieved 22 May 2023.
  15. ^ Jump up to:a b Hammond, Pete (19 May 2023). "'The Zone Of Interest' Review: Jonathan Glazer's Stunning Look At The Holocaust In A Way It Has Not Been Seen – Cannes Film Festival". Deadline. Archived from the original on 27 May 2023. Retrieved 22 May 2023.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Roxborough, Scott (8 January 2024). "Framing the Horrors of the Holocaust Through a 21st Century Lens: Making of 'The Zone of Interest'". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved 14 March 2024.
  17. ^ O'Falt, Chris; Desowitz, Bill (15 January 2024). "Avoiding the Historical Drama Trap: Why 'The Zone of Interest' Feels So Dangerous". IndieWire. Retrieved 15 March 2024.
  18. ^ Wiseman, Andreas (23 October 2019). "'Under The Skin' Director Jonathan Glazer Gears Up To Shoot Next Movie With A24, Film4, Access, House & Producers James Wilson & Ewa Puszczyńska". Deadline. Archived from the original on 2 June 2022. Retrieved 28 November 2022.
  19. ^ Ntim, Zac (15 November 2023). "Łukasz Żal On How Reality TV Shaped The Construction Of Cannes-Winning Nazi Drama 'The Zone Of Interest' — Camerimage". Deadline Hollywood. Archived from the original on 15 November 2023. Retrieved 15 November 2023.
  20. ^ Leigh, Danny (19 January 2024). "'This is a film to make us unsafe in the cinema. As we should be': Sandra Hüller and Christian Friedel on The Zone of Interest". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 21 January 2024. Retrieved 21 January 2024.
  21. ^ Riley, Jenelle (28 December 2023). "Sandra Huller on Breaking a No-Holocaust-Movie Rule for "The Zone of Interest", and Whether Her "Anatomy of a Fall" Character is Guilty". Variety. Archived from the original on 29 December 2023. Retrieved 30 December 2023.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Canfield, David (27 December 2023). "A Deep Dive Into The Zone of Interest's Chilling Presentation of Evil". Vanity Fair. Retrieved 15 March 2024.
  23. ^ "'The Zone of Interest' Director Jonathan Glazer Calls Out Israel's "Occupation" of Palestine in Rousing Oscars Speech | Decider". Retrieved 11 March 2024.
  24. ^ Coates, Tyler (27 February 2024). "The Zone of Interest Producer on Finding New Relevancy in a Holocaust Drama: Our Political Culture Is Closer to That of the Perpetrator Than We Think". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved 16 March 2024.
  25. ^ Roxborough, Scott (19 December 2023). "'The Zone of Interest' DP Lukasz Zal on Depicting Evil Without the Emotional Manipulation". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on 20 December 2023. Retrieved 21 December 2023.
  26. ^ Shachat, Sarah (16 October 2023). "Oscar Cinematography Survey: The Cameras and Lenses Used to Shoot 32 Awards Contenders". IndieWire. Archived from the original on 22 December 2023. Retrieved 21 December 2023.
  27. ^ Kring-Schreifels, Jake (15 December 2023). "Sounds that Cannot Be Unheard: Sound Designer Johnnie Burn on The Zone of Interest". Filmmaker. Archived from the original on 22 December 2023. Retrieved 22 December 2023.
  28. ^ Boone, John (13 December 2023). "'The Context Is Everything': Behind the Sights and Sound of 'The Zone of Interest' (Exclusive)". Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. Archived from the original on 22 December 2023. Retrieved 22 December 2023.
  29. ^ Struss, Jason (19 December 2023). "Creating the sound of death: How The Zone of Interest brings the Holocaust to chilling life". Digital Trends. Archived from the original on 22 December 2023. Retrieved 22 December 2023.
  30. ^ Martin, Laura (17 February 2024). "The Zone of Interest: How the most horrifying sounds in film history were created". BBC. Retrieved 17 February 2024.
  31. ^ Greiving, Tim (12 December 2023). "'Zone' composer Mica Levi is creating film music like you've never heard before". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 21 December 2023. Retrieved 22 December 2023.
  32. ^ Jump up to:a b Tartaglione, Nancy (13 April 2023). "Cannes Film Festival Lineup: Haynes, Anderson, Glazer, Kore-Eda, Wenders In Competition – Full List". Deadline Hollywood. Archived from the original on 19 April 2023. Retrieved 13 April 2023.
  33. ^ "The Screenings Guide of the 76th Festival de Cannes" (PDF). Festival de Cannes. 10 May 2023. p. 2. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 May 2023. Retrieved 10 May 2023.
  34. ^ Sharf, Zack (19 May 2023). "A24's Nazi Drama 'Zone of Interest' Is a Cannes Sensation With 6-Minute Standing Ovation". Variety. Archived from the original on 26 May 2023. Retrieved 21 May 2023.
  35. ^ Jump up to:a b Debruge, Peter (27 May 2023). "Cannes Awards: 'Anatomy of a Fall' Takes Palme d'Or, 'The Zone of Interest' and 'The Pot au Feu' Among Winners". Variety. Archived from the original on 28 May 2023. Retrieved 27 May 2023.
  36. ^ Jump up to:a b "'Zone of Interest', film on Auschwitz commandant, wins 2nd-highest prize at Cannes". The Jerusalem Post. 28 May 2023. Archived from the original on 28 May 2023. Retrieved 29 May 2023.
  37. ^ Jump up to:a b Bałaga, Marta (27 May 2023). "'The Zone of Interest,' 'The Settlers' Score Fipresci Awards at Cannes". Variety. Archived from the original on 28 May 2023. Retrieved 27 May 2023.
  38. ^ Davis, Clayton (30 August 2023). "Telluride Lineup Includes World Premieres of 'Saltburn,' 'The Bikeriders' and 'Rustin' With Tributes for Yorgos Lanthimos and Wim Wenders". Variety. Archived from the original on 31 August 2023. Retrieved 30 August 2023.
  39. ^ "Program Guide" (PDF). Telluride Film Festival. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 August 2023. Retrieved 30 August 2023.
  40. ^ "The Zone of Interest". TIFF. Archived from the original on 25 July 2023. Retrieved 25 July 2023.
  41. ^ Lattanzio, Ryan (2 August 2023). "Jonathan Glazer's 'The Zone of Interest' Sets December A24 Release and Shares Two New Images". IndieWire. Archived from the original on 17 October 2023. Retrieved 2 August 2023.
  42. ^ McCardle, Tommy (17 October 2023). "The Zone of Interest Trailer: Award-Winning Holocaust Film Shows Family Living Next to Auschwitz". People. Archived from the original on 17 October 2023. Retrieved 17 October 2023.
  43. ^ "The Zone of Interest". Film Distributor Association. Archived from the original on 21 November 2023. Retrieved 30 October 2023.
  44. ^ "PISF - Film "Strefa interesów" z datą kinowej premiery" (in Polish). Archived from the original on 18 August 2023. Retrieved 18 August 2023.
  45. ^ "'The Zone of Interest' Is Now Available to Stream at Home". Collider. 20 February 2024. Retrieved 22 February 2024.
  46. ^ Stevens, Matt (10 March 2024). "Jonathan Glazer Condemns 'Occupation' and Violence in Israel and Gaza. Glazer, the director of 'The Zone of Interest,' spoke about the war while accepting the Oscar for best international feature". The New York Times. Retrieved 11 March 2024.
  47. ^ Li, Shirley (11 March 2024). "Jonathan Glazer's Warning at the Oscars. The director of The Zone of Interest accepted his award with an anti-war speech that drew praise and confusion". The Atlantic. Retrieved 11 March 2024.
  48. ^ Rahman, Abid (11 March 2024). "Jonathan Glazer's Oscar Speech Becomes Latest Battleground in Israel-Gaza Conflict". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved 13 March 2024.
  49. ^ "The Zone Of Interest producer: Gaza conflict reminds us of 'selective empathy'". The Irish News. 18 February 2024. Retrieved 13 March 2024.
  50. ^ Klion, David (8 March 2024). "The Oscar Contender That Won't Let Us Look Away". The New York Times. Retrieved 13 March 2024.
  51. ^ Siegel, Tatiana (18 March 2024). "Over 450 Jewish Creatives and Professionals Denounce Jonathan Glazer's 'Zone of Interest' Oscars Speech in Open Letter (EXCLUSIVE)". Variety. Retrieved 19 March 2024.
  52. ^ Shafer, Ellise (5 April 2024). "Joaquin Phoenix, Elliott Gould, Chloe Fineman and More Jewish Creatives Support Jonathan Glazer's Oscars Speech in Open Letter (EXCLUSIVE)". Variety. Retrieved 5 April 2024.
  53. ^ Shoard, Catherine (21 March 2024). "'Unimpeachable, irrefutable': US playwright Tony Kushner praises Jonathan Glazer's Oscars speech". The Guardian. Retrieved 24 March 2024.
  54. ^ Kazan, Zoe (19 March 2023). "............kind of shocked that anyone who saw zone of interest could be shocked by what glazer said at the oscars". X. Retrieved 24 March 2024.
  55. ^ "In Oscars Speech, Director Jonathan Glazer Denounces 'Occupation' and 'Dehumanization' in Israel and Gaza". Jewish Exponent. 11 March 2024. Retrieved 13 March 2024.
  56. ^ D'Alessandro, Anthony (17 December 2023). "'Wonka' Yummy With $39M Opening As Musicals Bounce Back At The Box Office – Sunday Update". Deadline Hollywood. Archived from the original on 17 December 2023. Retrieved 17 December 2023.
  57. ^ D'Alessandro, Anthony (28 January 2024). "'The Beekeeper' Looks To Sting 'Mean Girls' During Woeful Weekend Without Wide Releases; How 'Barbenheimer' & Oscar Best Pic Noms Fared – Sunday Box Office Update". Deadline Hollywood. Archived from the original on 27 January 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2024.
  58. ^ Hibberd, James (17 October 2023). "'Zone of Interest' Trailer: First Look at A24's Haunting Holocaust Drama". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on 17 October 2023. Retrieved 17 October 2023.
  59. ^ Thorpe, Vanessa (20 May 2023). "Nazis and normality: UK directors unsettle Cannes with films tackling 'unseen' evil". The Observer. ISSN 0029-7712. Archived from the original on 4 November 2023. Retrieved 20 October 2023.
  60. ^ Zuckerman, Esther (13 October 2023). "Sandra Hüller on 'Anatomy of a Fall', 'The Zone of Interest' & What's Next". W Magazine. Archived from the original on 28 October 2023. Retrieved 19 October 2023.
  61. ^ Dalton, Ben (20 May 2023). "Jonathan Glazer talks connection between Cannes title 'The Zone Of Interest' and modern far-right movements". Screen Daily. Archived from the original on 20 May 2023. Retrieved 17 October 2023.
  62. ^ Malhotra, Rahul (17 October 2023). "First 'The Zone of Interest' Trailer Uncovers a Chilling Look at Evil in Holocaust Drama". Collider. Retrieved 17 October 2023.
  63. ^ Fuge, Jonathan (17 October 2023). "The Zone of Interest Trailer Teases A24's Critically Acclaimed Holocaust Drama". MovieWeb. Retrieved 17 October 2023.
  64. ^ Sarkisian, Jacob (16 October 2023). "'The Zone of Interest' will bag Best Director nomination for Jonathan Glazer". GoldDerby. Archived from the original on 16 October 2023. Retrieved 17 October 2023.
  65. ^ "The Zone of Interest". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango Media. Retrieved 8 April 2024.
  66. ^ "The Zone of Interest Reviews". Metacritic. Fandom, Inc. Retrieved 22 February 2024.
  67. ^ Maher, Kevin (21 May 2023). "The Zone of Interest review — Holocaust film masterfully reinvents Martin Amis novel". The Times. Archived from the original on 21 May 2023. Retrieved 22 May 2023.
  68. ^ Rooney, David (19 May 2023). "'The Zone of Interest' Review: Jonathan Glazer's Audacious Film Is a Bone-Chilling Holocaust Drama Like No Other". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved 22 May 2023.
  69. ^ Clarke, Donald (22 May 2023). "One film has shaken Cannes festival like few others in recent memory". The Irish Times. Archived from the original on 22 May 2023. Retrieved 22 May 2023.
  70. ^ Abraham, Raphael (22 May 2023). "The Zone of Interest review — devastating portrait of the commandant of Auschwitz". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 22 May 2023. Retrieved 22 May 2023.
  71. ^ Romney, Jonathan (19 May 2023). "'The Zone Of Interest': Cannes Review". Screen International. Archived from the original on 23 May 2023. Retrieved 23 May 2023.
  72. ^ Ehrlich, David (19 May 2023). "'The Zone of Interest' Review: Jonathan Glazer's Holocaust Anti-Drama Is a Chilling Look at the Banality of Evil". IndieWire. Archived from the original on 26 May 2023. Retrieved 22 May 2023.
  73. ^ Collin, Robbie (19 May 2023). "The Zone of Interest, Cannes review: Jonathan Glazer's Auschwitz film is horrifying in its banality". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 19 May 2023. Retrieved 22 May 2023.
  74. ^ Bradshaw, Peter (19 May 2023). "The Zone of Interest review – Jonathan Glazer adapts Martin Amis's chilling Holocaust drama". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 29 May 2023. Retrieved 22 May 2023.
  75. ^ Rodek, Hanns-Georg. "Where 'The Zone Of Interest' Won't Go On Auschwitz — A German Critique Of New Nazi Film". WorldCrunch. Archived from the original on 25 May 2023. Retrieved 25 May 2023.
  76. ^ Abbatescianni, Davide (21 May 2023). "Review: The Zone of Interest". Cineuropa. Archived from the original on 27 May 2023. Retrieved 26 May 2023.
  77. ^ Brody, Richard (14 December 2023). ""The Zone of Interest" is an Extreme Form of Holokitsch". The New Yorker.
  78. ^ Sadat, Yal (22 May 2023). "The Zone of Interest de Jonathan Glazer l l'actualité du cinéma". Cahiers du Cinéma (in French). Retrieved 18 March 2024.
  79. ^ "'It is dishonest': Germany divided over Oscar-nominated Auschwitz film The Zone of Interest". The Irish Times. Retrieved 19 March 2024.
  80. ^ Kilb, Andreas (28 February 2024). ""The Zone of Interest" mit Sandra Hüller und Christian Friedel neu im Kino". FAZ.NET (in German). ISSN 0174-4909. Retrieved 19 March 2024.
  81. ^ ""Best...I've Witnessed": Steven Spielberg Reviews A24s the Zone of Interest". Screen Rant. 21 February 2024.
  82. ^ Feinberg, Scott (21 February 2024). "'Schindler's List': An Oral History of a Masterpiece". The Hollywood Reporter.
  83. ^ "Alfonso Cuaron: 'The Zone of Interest' is "film of the century"". 6 February 2024.
  84. ^ Field, Todd; et al. (13 December 2023). "16 Directors Praise 2023's Best Films: Alfonso Cuarón on 'Killers of the Flower Moon,' Jane Campion on 'Priscilla' and More". Variety. Archived from the original on 1 January 2024. Retrieved 23 January 2024.
  85. ^ "宇垣美里、小島秀夫、森達也らが映画「関心領域」語る こがけん「ひたすらに怖い」(映画ナタリー)". Yahoo!ニュース (in Japanese). Retrieved 13 May 2024.
  86. ^ Chuba, Kirsten (9 January 2024). "Oppenheimer Leads Nominations for 2024 AARP Movies for Grownups Awards". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on 9 January 2024. Retrieved 9 January 2024.
  87. ^ Pedersen, Erik; Petski, Denise (17 January 2024). "Killers Of The Flower Moon Wins Best Picture At AARP Movies For Grownups Awards: Full List". Deadline Hollywood. Archived from the original on 17 January 2024. Retrieved 17 January 2024.
  88. ^ "International Feature Film - The Academy". Twitter. 23 January 2024. Archived from the original on 23 January 2024.
  89. ^ Merin, Jennifer (22 December 2023). "2023 EDA Awards Nominees". Alliance of Women Film Journalists. Archived from the original on 23 December 2023. Retrieved 23 December 2023.
  90. ^ Anderson, Erik (7 December 2023). "'Barbie' and 'Oppenheimer' Lead Hollywood Creative Alliance (HCA) Astra Awards Nominations". AwardsWatch. Archived from the original on 8 December 2023. Retrieved 8 December 2023.
  91. ^ Neglia, Matt (3 January 2024). "The 2023 Austin Film Critics Association (AFCA) Nominations". Next Best Picture. Archived from the original on 3 January 2024. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
  92. ^ "Nominations Announced for the 2024 EE BAFTA Film Awards". www.bafta.org. 18 January 2024. Archived from the original on 1 February 2024. Retrieved 18 January 2024.
  93. ^ Anderson, Erik (10 December 2023). "2023 Boston Society of Film Critics (BSFC): 'The Holdovers' Wins Best Film, Actor, Supporting Actress, Screenplay". AwardsWatch. Archived from the original on 11 December 2023. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
  94. ^ "EnergaCAMERIMAGE 2023 WINNERS! – EnergaCAMERIMAGE 2023". camerimage.pl. Archived from the original on 18 November 2023. Retrieved 19 November 2023.
  95. ^ "The 76th Festival de Cannes winners' list". Festival de Cannes. 27 May 2023. Archived from the original on 28 May 2023. Retrieved 28 May 2023.
  96. ^ Tallerico, Brian (8 December 2023). "Killers of the Flower Moon, Oppenheimer, Poor Things Lead CFCA Nominations". RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on 8 December 2023. Retrieved 8 December 2023.
  97. ^ Nolfi, Joey (13 December 2023). "2024 Critics Choice Awards film nominations: See the full list". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on 13 December 2023. Retrieved 13 December 2023.
  98. ^ Jorgenson, Todd (18 December 2023). "DFW Film Critics Name The Holdovers Best Picture of 2023". Dallas-Fort Worth Film Critics Association. Archived from the original on 18 December 2023. Retrieved 18 December 2023.
  99. ^ Neglia, Matt (12 January 2024). "The 2023 Denver Film Critics Society (DFCS) Winners". Next Best Picture. Archived from the original on 12 January 2024. Retrieved 21 January 2024.
  100. ^ Goodfellow, Melanie (7 November 2023). "'Fallen Leaves' & 'The Zone Of Interest' Top European Film Award Nominations In Main Categories". Deadline Hollywood. Archived from the original on 8 December 2023. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
  101. ^ "These are the winners of the Excellence Awards 2023". European Film Awards. 30 November 2023. Archived from the original on 9 December 2023. Retrieved 30 November 2023.
  102. ^ Anderson, Erik (13 December 2023). "Florida Film Critics Circle (FFCC) Nominations". AwardsWatch. Archived from the original on 13 December 2023. Retrieved 14 December 2023.
  103. ^ ""The Boy and the Heron" flies high with Florida Film Critics". Florida Film Critics Circle. 21 December 2023. Archived from the original on 23 December 2023. Retrieved 21 December 2023.
  104. ^ "Hillary Clinton Teases Sharon Stone On "Gigantic Bath Robe" Gown At Cinema For Peace Gala In Berlin".
  105. ^ Neglia, Matt (29 December 2023). "The 2023 Georgia Film Critics Association (GAFCA) Nominations". Next Best Picture. Archived from the original on 30 December 2023. Retrieved 30 December 2023.
  106. ^ Neglia, Matt (5 January 2024). "The 2023 Georgia Film Critics Association (GAFCA) Winners". Next Best Picture. Archived from the original on 6 January 2024. Retrieved 5 January 2024.
  107. ^ Lang, Brent; Shanfeld, Ethan (11 December 2023). "Golden Globes 2024: Full Nominations List". Variety. Archived from the original on 11 December 2023. Retrieved 12 December 2023.
  108. ^ Tangcay, Jazz (16 January 2024). "Oppenheimer Dominates Motion Picture Sound Editors Golden Reel Awards Nominations". Variety. Archived from the original on 16 January 2024. Retrieved 16 January 2024.
  109. ^ Lewis, Hilary (24 October 2023). "'Past Lives,' 'A Thousand and One' and 'All of Us Strangers' Top Gotham Awards Film Nominees". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on 26 October 2023. Retrieved 25 October 2023.
  110. ^ Grein, Paul (2 November 2023). "Songs From 'Barbie' Pace 2023 Hollywood Music in Media Awards Nominations (Full List)". Billboard. Archived from the original on 3 November 2023. Retrieved 3 November 2023.
  111. ^ Darling, Cary (9 January 2024). "Barbie, Oppenheimer lead Houston Film Critics Society's nominations". Houston Chronicle. Archived from the original on 9 January 2024. Retrieved 9 January 2024.
  112. ^ Darling, Cary (22 January 2024). "Houston Film Critics Society names Poor Things the best film of 2023". Houston Chronicle. Archived from the original on 22 January 2024. Retrieved 22 January 2024.
  113. ^ Blauvelt, Christian (5 December 2023). "'American Fiction,' 'May December,' 'Past Lives' Lead 2024 Indie Spirits Noms". IndieWire. Archived from the original on 20 December 2023. Retrieved 5 December 2023.
  114. ^ Rogers, Nick (12 December 2023). "Nominations Announced for the 2023 Indiana Film Journalists Association Awards". Midwest Film Journal. Archived from the original on 25 January 2024. Retrieved 21 January 2024.
  115. ^ Neglia, Matt (17 December 2023). "The 2023 Indiana Film Journalists Association (IFJA) Winners". Next Best Picture. Archived from the original on 18 December 2023. Retrieved 21 January 2024.
  116. ^ Blauvelt, Christian (11 December 2023). "2023 Critics Poll: The Best Films and Performances, According to 158 Critics from Around the World". IndieWire. Archived from the original on 21 December 2023. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
  117. ^ Wilbur, Brock (28 January 2024). "KC Film Critics Circle announce 58th Annual James Loutzenhiser Awards for excellence in film". The Pitch. Archived from the original on 29 January 2024. Retrieved 29 January 2024.
  118. ^ Neglia, Matt (13 December 2023). "The 2023 Las Vegas Film Critics Society (LVFCS) Winners". Next Best Picture. Archived from the original on 13 December 2023. Retrieved 21 January 2024.
  119. ^ Davis, Clayton (10 December 2023). "'The Zone of Interest' Wins Best Picture at Los Angeles Film Critics Awards, Four Women Take Acting Prizes (Full Winners List)". Variety. Archived from the original on 10 December 2023. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
  120. ^ "49th Los Angeles Film Critics Association Awards". Los Angeles Film Critics Association. 10 December 2023. Archived from the original on 8 January 2024. Retrieved 11 January 2024.
  121. ^ White, Abbey (20 September 2023). "Montclair Film Festival Sets 'Dream Scenario' and 'Eileen' as Opening and Closing Night Films (Exclusive)". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on 11 October 2023. Retrieved 6 October 2023.
  122. ^ Davis, Clayton (6 November 2023). "'Killers of the Flower Moon' Named Best Picture by National Board of Review, Lily Gladstone and Paul Giamatti Nab Top Acting Honors". Variety. Archived from the original on 8 December 2023. Retrieved 6 November 2023.
  123. ^ Lewis, Hilary (6 December 2023). "National Board of Review Names 'Killers of the Flower Moon' Best Film of 2023". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on 15 January 2024. Retrieved 6 December 2023.
  124. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Lewis, Hilary (6 January 2024). "National Society of Film Critics Voting Underway". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on 6 January 2024. Retrieved 6 January 2024.
  125. ^ Neglia, Matt (18 December 2023). "The 2023 North Texas Film Critics Association (NTFCA) Winners". Next Best Picture. Archived from the original on 19 December 2023. Retrieved 21 January 2024.
  126. ^ Neglia, Matt (3 January 2024). "The 2023 Oklahoma Film Critics Circle (OFCC) Winners". Next Best Picture. Archived from the original on 3 January 2024. Retrieved 21 January 2024.
  127. ^ Bergeson, Samantha (12 January 2024). "PGA Awards 2024 Nominations: Maestro, Killers of the Flower Moon, and Past Lives Among Contenders". IndieWire. Archived from the original on 12 January 2024. Retrieved 12 January 2024.
  128. ^ Anderson, Erik (15 December 2023). "San Diego Film Critics Society (SDFCS) Nominations". AwardsWatch. Archived from the original on 15 December 2023. Retrieved 15 December 2023.
  129. ^ Neglia, Matt (5 January 2024). "The 2023 San Francisco Bay Area Film Critics Circle (SFBAFCC) Nominations". Next Best Picture. Archived from the original on 6 January 2024. Retrieved 5 January 2024.
  130. ^ "IPA Reveals Nominations for the 28th Satellite™ Awards". International Press Academy. 18 December 2023. Archived from the original on 19 December 2023. Retrieved 18 December 2023.
  131. ^ Neglia, Matt (3 January 2024). "The 2023 Seattle Film Critics Society (SFCS) Nominations". Next Best Picture. Archived from the original on 3 January 2024. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
  132. ^ Neglia, Matt (21 December 2023). "The 2023 Society Of Composers And Lyricists (SCL) Nominations". Next Best Picture. Archived from the original on 22 December 2023. Retrieved 22 December 2023.
  133. ^ Anderson, Erik (18 December 2023). "Southeastern Film Critics Association (SEFCA): Oppenheimer Wins 8 including Best Picture". AwardsWatch. Archived from the original on 26 December 2023. Retrieved 21 January 2024.
  134. ^ Anderson, Eric (10 December 2023). "2023 St. Louis Film Critics Association (StLFCA) Nominations". awardswatch.com. AwardsWatch. Archived from the original on 14 December 2023. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
  135. ^ Vlessing, Etan (22 January 2024). "Oppenheimer Leads Vancouver Film Critics Circle Nominations With Six Nods". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on 28 January 2024. Retrieved 23 January 2024.
  136. ^ Neglia, Matt (17 December 2023). "The 2023 Toronto Film Critics Association (TFCA) Winners". Next Best Picture. Archived from the original on 17 December 2023. Retrieved 17 December 2023.
  137. ^ Neglia, Matt (9 December 2023). "The 2023 Washington DC Area Film Critics Association (WAFCA) Nominations". Next Best Picture. Archived from the original on 9 December 2023. Retrieved 9 December 2023.

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]

===
関心領域 (映画)

관심 영역 (영화)

출처 : 무료 백과 사전 "Wikipedia (Wikipedia)"
관심 영역
관심 영역
감독조나단 글레이저
각본조나단 글레이저
원작마틴 에이미스
" The Zone of Interest "
만들다
  • 제임스 윌슨
  • 에바 푸슈틴스카
제작 총 지휘
수행자
음악미카 레비 ( 영어판 )
촬영우카슈 잘
편집폴 와츠
제작회사
배급
공공의
  • 프랑스 국기2023년 5월 19일( CIFF )
  • 미국 국기2023년 12월 15일
  • 영국 국기2024년 2월 2일
  • 폴란드의 국기2024년 2월 9일
  • 일본의 국기2024년 5월 24일
상영시간105점 [2]
제작국
언어
  • 독일어
  • 폴란드어
  • 이디시어
흥행 소득$48,963,682 [5] [6]
템플릿 보기

' 관심 영역 '(칸신료이키, The Zone of Interest )은 마틴 에이미스 의 동명의 소설을 원작으로 하며, 조나단 글레이저 가 각본·감독을 맡은 2023년 미국 · 영국 · 폴란드 공동 제작의 역사・드라마 영화 이다. 크리스티안 프리델 ( 영어판 ) 이 아우슈비츠 강제 수용소 옆에 세운 새집에서 아내 헤트비히( 잔드라 휴러 )와의 이상적인 생활을 쌓으려는 루돌프 헤스 소장을 연기 한다 .

'관심영역'은 2023년 5월 19일 제76회 칸 국제영화제 에서 프리미어 상영되어 그랑프리 와 FIPRESCI상을 획득했다. 제49회 로스앤젤레스 영화 비평가 협회 상에서는 작품상을 획득했고 [7] , 2023년 내셔널 보드 오브 리뷰 상에서는 국제영화 톱 5로 선정되었다. 제96회 아카데미상에는 아카데미 작품상 , 감독상 , 국제장편영화상 (영국대표작) [8] 을 포함한 5부문에 노미네이트되어 국제장편 영화상· 음향상을 수상했다. 또 골든글로브상에는 드라마 영화상 을 포함한 3부문, 영국 아카데미상 ( 영어판 ) 에는 영국 작품상을 포함한 9부문에 노미네이트되었다.

플롯 [ 편집 ]

캐스트 [ 편집 ]

제작 [ 편집 ]

기획 [ 편집 ]

시계 방향: 각본가 감독의 조나단 글레이저, 원작자 마틴 에이미스 , 출연자 잔드라 휴러 , 크리스티안 프리델 ( 영어판 )

『관심영역』의 제작에는 10년이 걸렸다 [9] . ' 언더 더 스킨 종 포식' 이 완성된 후, 그레이저는 출판 전 마틴 에이미스 의 소설 ' The Zone of Interest '를 다룬 신문의 서평 기사를 읽고 흥미를 끌었다. 그는 이 소설을 읽은 후 옵션 계약을 맺었다. 소설의 주인공 파울과 한나의 인형 부부는 아우슈비츠 강제 수용소 에서 가장 길게 소장 ( 영어판 ) 을 맡은 루돌프 헤스 와 그 아내의 헤트비히를 대략 모델로 하고 있었다. 그레이저는 가상의 캐릭터 대신에 실재의 인물을 영화에서 다루는 것을 선택해, 헤스 부부에 대해서 2년간에 걸친 철저한 조사를 실시했다 [10] . 그는 아우슈비츠를 여러 번 방문해 헤스저택의 광경에 깊은 감명을 받았다 [11] . 그는 아우슈비츠 박물관 및 기타 조직과 협력하여 공문관에 액세스할 수 있는 특별 허가를 얻어 생존자와 헤스 집에서 일한 사람들이 제공한 증언을 조사했다. 이러한 증언을 연결함으로써, 글레이저는 서서히, 실제로 일어난 일에 관계하는 사람들 한사람 한사람의 상세한 묘사를 구축해 갔다 [12] [13] . 또 그는 조사시에 역사가 티모시 스나이더 의 2015년 저서 ' 블랙 어스 홀로코스트의 역사와 경고 ( 영어판 ) '도 참고했다 [10] .

글레이저는 홀로코스트를 수행한 사람들이 종종 '거의 신화적인 것까지 사악한' 사람들로 그려져 있다고 지적하고, 그러한 점에 대해 신화성을 제거하고 명확하게 만드는 영화를 만드는 것을 뜻합니다. 했다. 홀로코스트의 이야기를, 「과거에 있어 현재에는 관계하지 않는 무엇인가」로서가 아니라, 「지금, 여기에서의 이야기」로서 말하려고 했다 [9] [14] . 자신의 접근법에 대해서는 글레이저는 “우리는 스스로 그런 일은 없다고 생각하고 싶었을지도 모르지만, 감정적으로도 정치적으로도 홀로코스트 실행자의 문화에 가깝다”고 한다. 일을 보여줌으로써 자신들을 '안태가 아니다'라는 기분으로 만든다' 같은 영화, 그리고 감상을 배제한 '범죄 수사에 해당하는 감식 같은', '마른 비탄의 눈'을 통해 볼 수 있는 영화 를 생각하고 있던 철학자 질리안 로즈 ( 영어판 ) 가 쓴 것을 끌어내고 있다 [15] .

그레이저는 2019년에 프로젝트를 밝혀 A24 , 필름 4·프로덕션스 ( 영어판 ) , 액세스·엔터테인먼트, 하우스·프로덕션스가 공동 출자와 제작을 실시하는 것을 발표했다 [16] [17] . 프리델은 루돌프 헤스 역을 위해 2019년 런던에서 그레이저와 짐 윌슨 ( 영어판 ) 을 처음 만났다. 글레이저와 윌슨의 영화 기획 설명에 당황하면서 프리델은 자신도 그렇게 할 수밖에 없다고 느꼈다. 2013년 역사 드라마 ' Amour Fou '에서 휴러와 공연하고 있던 프리델은 루돌프의 아내 헤트비히 역에 그녀를 추천했다 [18] . 휴러에게는 우선 홀로코스트를 소재로 한 영화로서 프로젝트의 성질을 알리기 전에 문맥을 무시하고 제시된 루돌프와 헤트비히의 논쟁을 각본에서 발췌한 것이 보내졌다. 휴러는 나치를 연기하지 않는다고 마음으로 결정했지만, 그레이저와 면회하고, 나치즘을 스크린상에서 올바르게 그리는 방법에 대해 그녀가 안고 있던 우려를 그가 공유해, 대처해 줄 것이라고 확신했다. 휴러 자신의 애견인 블랙 와이마 러너 는 '관심 영역'에서 헤스가의 애견 디라를 연기하고 있다 [19] .

영화에 등장하는 폴란드인 소녀는 글레이저가 조사 중에 만난 알렉산드리아라는 여성에게 영감을 받고 있다. 12살 무렵 폴란드의 저항운동원 이었던 그녀는 굶주림으로 고통받는 죄수를 위해 사과를 두기 위해 수용소까지 자전거로 다니고 있었다. 영화와 마찬가지로 그녀는 죄수가 쓴 음악을 발견했다. 이 죄수는 유제프 우라(Joseph Wulf)였지만, 그는 전쟁을 살아남았다. 알렉산드리아는 글레이저와는 90세 때 면회했고, 곧 죽었다. 영화에서 사용되고 있는 자전거도 여배우가 입고 있는 의상도 그녀의 것이다 [9] .

촬영 [ 편집 ]

오리지널 헤스 저택은 종전 후 개인의 저택으로 사용되어 왔다. 프로덕션 디자이너 크리스 오디는 수용소 벽 건너편에 있는 폐가게를 몇 달에 걸쳐 헤스 저택의 복제본으로 개조해 촬영 시작시 꽃이 피도록 2021년 4월 정원 심기를 시작했다 . 10] . 주요 촬영 은 2021년 여름에 아우슈비츠에서 시작되어 약 55일간 계속되었다 [10] [11] . 추가 촬영은 2022년 1월에 예레냐 그라 에서 행해졌다 [20] .

이 영화는 라이카의 렌즈를 장착한 Sony Venice 의 디지털 카메라로 촬영되었다 [21] . 글레이저와 촬영 감독인 우카슈 쟈르는 최대 10대의 카메라를 집안과 그 주변에 묻어 현장에 스태프를 두지 않고 동시에 돌려 계속했다. 글레이저가 ‘나치의 저택의 ‘ 빅 브라더 ( 영어판 ) ’’라고 명명한 이 접근법으로 배우들은 촬영 중에 다양한 실험을 할 수 있었다 [10] [11] [13] . 글레이저와 쟈르는 현대적인 외관을 목표로 아우슈비츠를 아름답게 찍는 것은 바람직하지 않았다. 그 결과, 조명은 조합되지 않고 자연광만이 사용되었다 [22] .

글레이저는 수용소 내에서 일어나고 있는 학살 행위를 보이지 않고 단지 들려줄 뿐이다. 그는 이 영화의 음향을 '다른 영화' '분명히 영화'라고 표현했다 [11] . 따라서 음향 디자이너인 조니 번은 아우슈비츠에서의 관련 사건, 목격자의 증언, 수용소의 큰 지도 등을 포함한 600페이지에 이르는 자료를 정리하여 소리의 거리나 반향을 적절히 판단할 수 있도록 했다 [23] . 그는 촬영이 시작되기 전 1년간 제조기계, 화장장, 노, 장화, 당시를 정확하게 재현한 총성, 인간의 고통 소리 등을 포함한 음향 라이브러리를 만들었다. 그는 촬영과 포스트 프로덕션에 이르기까지 라이브러리 구축을 계속했다 [24] [25] . 미카 레비 ( 영어판 ) 는 처음에는 이 영화를 위해 점수를 썼지만, 글레이저와 번은 영화가 '달콤해지거나 드라마틱하게 되기'를 원하지 않았기 때문에 대부분이 파괴되었다. 했다. 프롤로그를 위해 레비가 쓴 음악은 영화에 남아 있었고, 또한 몇몇 시퀀스를 위해 만들어진 사운드스케이프와 에필로그를 위한 사운드콜라주도 남겨졌다 [26] .

공개 [ 편집 ]

'관심영역'은 제76회 칸 국제영화제 에서 팔 름돌을 다투는 경쟁부문으로 선출되어 [ 27 ] 오베이션을 받았다 [29] . 영화제에서는 그랑프리 , 칸 사운드 트랙상 ( 영어판 ) , FIPRESCI상을 수상했다 [30] [31] [32] .

북미 프리미어는 2023년 9월 1일에 제50회 텔라이드 영화제 ( 영어판 ) 에서 행해졌다 [33] [34] . 또 제48회 토론토 국제 영화제 에서도 상영되었다 [35] . 미국에서는 당초는 2023년 12월 8일 공개 예정이었지만 연기되어 [36] , 12월 15일에 한정 공개 되었다 [37] . 영국은 2024년 2월 2일에 공개된다 [38] . 폴란드에서는 2024년 2월 9일에 공개된다 [39] . 일본에서는 2024년 5월 24일에 공개된다 [40] .

평가 [ 편집 ]

비평가의 반응 [ 편집 ]

'관심 영역'은 프리미어 상영시에 찬양되었다 [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] . 리뷰 수집 사이트 의 Rotten Tomatoes 에서는 222건의 비평을 바탕으로 지지율은 92%, 평균점은 8.7/10이 되어, “처참한 범죄에 가담하는 사람들의 흔한 존재를 냉정하게 검증하는 '관심 영역'은 , 용서하기 어려운 잔학 행위의 배후에 있는 속악함을 냉철하게 바라보게 한다”라고 정리되었다 [48] . Metacritic 에서는 52건의 비평에 근거하여 가중 평균치는 90/100으로 나타났다 [49] .

' 타임스 '의 케빈 메어 ( 영어판 ) 는 “획기적인 영화이며, 매우 중요하고, 난해한 발상을 두려워하지 않는다”고 평했다 [50] . ‘ 할리우드 리포터 ’의 데이비드 루니는 “다른 보기 없는 파괴적인 홀로코스트 극이며, (조나단 글레이저 감독의) 색조와 시각적 스토리텔링의 정확한 컨트롤을 놀라울 정도로 효과적으로 보여 있다”라고 평가했다 [51] . " 아일리쉬 타임즈 "의 도널드 클라크는 "섬세한 소재에 이러한 공식적인 접근 방식을 취함으로써 그레이저는 여전히 문제가있을 수 있습니다. 한 규율, 그리고 전혀 감상적이지 않은 것이, 그가 이 소재에 대해 안고 있는 깊은 적의를 이야기하고 있다”고 평가했다 [52] . ' 파이낸셜 타임즈 '의 라파엘 에이브러햄은 “그레이저는 이러한 극단적인 비인간성을 보통으로 그려서 괴물을 흔들리게 할 뿐만 아니라, 그 진정한 무서움을 우리에게 재인식시킨다 라고 하는 , 훨씬 ​​위대한 일을 이룬 것 "이라고 평가했다 [ 53 ] . ' 스크린 인터내셔널 ( 영어판 ) '의 조나단 롬니는 이 영화를 “잘못된 리트릭을 배제하고 관객의 상상력과 감정적인 반응에 최대한의 여백을 남기고 있다”고 평가했다 [54] .

' 인디 와이어 ( 영어판 ) '의 데이비드 엘리히는 그레이저의 카메라워크는 "드라마의 부족이 그 자체로 깊게 병에 걸려가는 영화에 평탄한 균질성을 심었다"고 평가했다 [55] . ' 데일리 텔레그래프 '의 로비 콜린 ( 영어판 ) 은 “세심한 프레이밍과 음향 디자인에 의해 그 공포는 모든 샷의 끝을 괴롭히고 있다”고 평가했다 [56] . ' 가디언 '의 피터 브래드쇼 ( 영어판 ) 는 4 별을 주고, 이 영화를 「그 예술성고, 아마 (의도적인) 악취미를 완전하게 컨트롤 할 수 없는 영화」라고 평가해, 동시에 "미카 레비의 멋진 점수와 조니 번의 음향 디자인"을 칭찬했다 [57] .

영화 제작자 토드필드 는 이 영화를 칭찬하며 “그레이저 영화에 익숙한 사람에게는 여기서 그의 접근이 은유나 장르의 자부, 혹은 우리가 당연하다고 생각하는 영화적인 약어에 방해받지 않는 것은 놀라운 일도 아니다 . ( 영어판 )』), 초상현상(『기억의 가시』), 과학 픽션(『언더 더 스킨 종의 포식』)을 완전히 쇄신해 왔다. 마치 그때까지 본 적이 없는 만큼 간을 빼는 독특함이다”라고 평가했다 [58] .

반대로 이탈리아 영화 비평가인 데이비드 아바테스티안니가 Cineuropa 에서 발표한 비평은 그다지 호의적이지 않았다. 그는 불안한 분위기는 잘 되어 있었지만 단조롭다고 느끼고, 또한 캐스트 연기에 관해서도 변화가 부족하고 2시간 정체된 채로 생각하고, 이 영화 속에서 제시된 컨셉에 변화를 가져올 수 있다. 할 수 없다고 지적했다 [59] . 독일의 비평가인 한스 게오르크 로덱은 Worldcrunch 에 기고해 ''관심 영역'이 대답하지 않는 최초의 의문이 있다. 이것은 무지한 것인가? 물론 그렇지 않다. 적인 승인인가? 분명 그렇겠지. 경이로 느껴지는 상황 속에서의 목가적인 생활에의 동경인가? 글레이저는 아마 지금까지의 홀로코스트 영화보다 억압적인 상황을 묘사하고 있다 .


===

The Zone of Interest review – Jonathan Glazer’s unforgettable Auschwitz drama is a brutal masterpiece

This article is more than 4 months old

Only the constant pall of smoke, and a dread-inducing soundscape, tell of the horrors beyond the wall as the idyllic life of the commandant of the death camp and his family rolls by in Glazer’s Oscar-nominated film

Before you read on, a word of caution. There are some films – many of them – that impress on a first viewing but which start to trickle away, like a handful of sand, the moment you leave the cinema. Then there are others, far fewer in number, that strike like a lightning bolt on a first watch and stay with you, scarring themselves into your psyche and subtly but permanently shifting your movie-viewing paradigm on its axis. Jonathan Glazer’s masterful and chilling The Zone of Interest fell into the second group for me. I left it shaken and stricken; it stayed with me, stubbornly, over the months that followed.

As most film fans will agree, that kind of viscerally intense response to a film is the holy grail of cinema viewing. It’s a vanishingly rare experience, and one that is magnified by the sense of discovery that comes from knowing virtually nothing about a film going in (I knew that it was a loose adaptation of the novel of the same title by Martin Amis, but little else). So with that in mind, to any readers who remain in the privileged position of knowing nothing about The Zone of Interest, consider putting aside this review and watching the film first. Otherwise, read on.

To describe The Zone of Interest as an adapted screenplay is perhaps misleading (although it has secured an Oscar nomination in that category, along with four others, including best picture and best director). In fact, the film is very much its own brooding, boldly unconventional entity, sharing with Amis’s book a title and a location – Auschwitz, or more specifically just outside the walls of the camp, in the home of a high-ranking Nazi and his family – but little else.

The walls are a crucial component of this film, which shows the daily details of the life of an upwardly mobile Nazi couple – the commandant of Auschwitz, Rudolf Höss (Christian Friedel), and his wife, Hedwig (Sandra Hüller) – and their five children. The Höss family are raised according to the tenets of the Artaman League, a German anti-urban, back-to-the-land movement that advocated an agrarian ideal and respect for the natural world (Rudolf, a man who presides over the murders of thousands of people each week, dictates an aggrieved memo about the lack of respect for his prized lilacs).

They enjoy wholesome, halcyon picnics by the river (predominantly captured, like most of the picture, in dispassionate mid and wide shots) and idyllic days in the lush, lovingly tended garden of the Höss villa, a source of considerable pride for Hedwig. We never see beyond the walls that separate her cherished roses and dahlias from the industrial death factory on the other side. But through Johnnie Burn’s incredible, immersive sound design, the ambient noise generated by the horrors within the camp is evoked with a suffocating intensity that matches the choking pall of smoke billowing continuously from the Auschwitz furnace chimneys.

Burn’s remarkable work is not the only aural element that contributes to the film’s brutal power. Glazer reteams with composer Mica Levi, his collaborator on his previous film, Under the Skin. Levi’s sparsely used score, accompanying eerie night-vision thermal images, jolts us out of the oblivious banality of the Höss household. And their compositions bookend the picture, with what sounds like a chorus of tormented souls.

A gnawing sense of dread permeates the entire film, created through sound and score, but also through telling details, such as the way the father’s work has polluted his children’s play (the older boy locks his little brother in a greenhouse and then teases him by making the hissing sound of gas). Imagine the stress levels of the chilling baby-on-the-beach sequence from Under the Skin, but stretched out to feature length. It’s a bruising watch.

Sandra Hüller as Hedwig Höss in The Zone of Interest. Photograph: AP

Unshowy but impeccable in the two main roles, both Friedel and Hüller excel. Friedel plays Rudolf as a pedantic, mid-level bureaucrat with a thin, needling voice and a despot’s haircut, whose unquestioning efficiency and commitment to the cause of National Socialism has facilitated his rapid ascent within the SS. And Hüller’s Hedy chortles over her good fortune as she cherrypicks the choicest possessions of murdered Jewish prisoners, parading her newly elevated status like a purloined mink coat. Nowhere is the understated brilliance of Hüller’s performance better demonstrated than in the delivery of a single line of dialogue, said to her housemaid: “I could have my husband spread your ashes across the fields of Babice.” It could be wielded like a deadly weapon, but Hüller says it conversationally, almost pleasantly. The impact all but knocks the breath from your body.

===

Jun 1, 2024
Definitely one of the best movies of the year, though not my favorite in watching. The horror goes to the extent of what human nature can only imagine. Blood curdling from beginning to end. I could not stop thinking of this movie after watching, but it is one of the best movies I will NEVER want to revisit ever again.

Content collapsed.
Jun 1, 2024
Fantastically haunting. Very grounded. Terrifying how ordinary these people lived their lives and I must say, the movie will leave an impact on you. Maybe even show you a glimpse of the apathy in us all.

Content collapsed.
S A
May 26, 2024
the movie has a great concept.But I can't endure that pressure of background sounds and I have bad feeling. The sounds are very frightening.

Content collapsed.
Mark B
May 21, 2024
Incredibile. Glazer cements his reputation as a genius.

Content collapsed.
James B
May 21, 2024
Enjoyed this one, it’s a slow moving fly on the wall type film. I found this WW2 flick stands out amongst a lot generic films that have come out in the last few years of an over saturated film genre. I like how the horrors of what is unfolding next door is just out of eyeshot but not earshot. The producers of this film have focused on the sound to hint at the horrible industrial killing machine that is churning next door to the Hoss families idyllic home. I love how you never saw the crimes going on at Auschwitz but could just hear them in a muffled way, it almost makes it worse than say Schindler’s list, as you have to use your imagination. I found Hedwig Rudolf Hoss’s wife to be a pitiful character, she is so oblivious and indifferent to the human suffering her husband partakes in for his work. She is only concerned with domestic affairs and her and her children’s needs. She is a typical example of the obliviousness and callousness of the German population at that time towards the Jewish people. Although I realise the vast majority of Germans had no idea what was occurring at these concentration camps, Hedwig would have been privy to a lot of it which makes her despicable in my eyes.

Content expanded.
Thomas P
May 20, 2024
I won't lie. I had to watch a YouTube video to understand why this movie is really good. The way everything looks and sounds was really disturbing but i just didn't really get It at first and kind of got bored. Having said that, I think it's just really subtle at showing how evil humans are.

Content collapsed.
Stephen W
May 18, 2024
It's a total one off and a brilliantly made film. Amongst the mundanity of the Hess life, the film offers wonderful moments. The dream sequences, the mother who walks away and the shocking end. It forces you to question how this happened and offers suggestions as to how it did. I would love to give it 5 stars and maybe after a second watch I will.

Content collapsed.
Falso Y
May 13, 2024
Kubrick would be proud

Content collapsed.
Irene M
May 13, 2024
only very lightly inspired by the book. Its almost documentary style of storytelling was worth watching, very different from the book and thus stands on its own. What did the mother write on her note, before she left?

Content collapsed.

===

Amour Fou (2014 film) - Wikipedia

Amour Fou (2014 film) - Wikipedia

Amour Fou (2014 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Amour Fou
Directed byJessica Hausner
Written byJessica Hausner
Produced byMartin Gschlacht
Antonin Svoboda
Bruno Wagner
Bady Minck
Alexander Dumreicher-Ivanceanu
StarringBirte Schnöink
Christian Friedel
Stephan Grossmann
CinematographyMartin Gschlacht
Edited byKarina Ressler
Production
companies
Amour Fou Luxembourg
Essential Filmproduktion
Coproduction Office
Release dates
  • 16 May 2014 (Cannes)
  • 6 November 2014 (Austria)
Running time
96 minutes
CountriesAustria
Germany
Luxembourg
LanguageGerman

Amour Fou ("mad love") is a 2014 Austrian film directed by Jessica Hausner, starring Christian Friedel and Birte Schnöink. The story is set in Berlin in 1810 and 1811, and follows the German writer Heinrich von Kleist and his lover Henriette Vogel in the final stages of their lives. It was screened in the Un Certain Regard section at the 2014 Cannes Film Festival.[1]

Plot[edit]

In Berlin the affluent Henriette Vogel (Birte Schnöink) holds a soiree where the poet Heinrich von Kleist attends. Heinrich approaches his close friend and cousin Marie (Sandra Hüller) and after telling her how living has become painful to him he asks her to consider dying with him in a murder-suicide pact. Marie declines.

Heinrich then approaches Henriette and tells her that as Marie has declined his dearest wish his love for her is dying as his love for Henriette begins to blossom. After telling Henriette that he feels she is an unloved outsider like him he asks her to join him in death. Henriette is appalled at his characterization of her as she feels she is close to both her husband and her daughter. She refuses his offer. Shortly after Henriette begins to suffer from spasms and fainting fits.

Heinrich continues to visit with Henriette during her illness and finds her life mediocre and conventional as she will not even allow him to visit her alone in order not to raise gossip. He continues to hope that she will consent to die with him.

For a while Henriette's doctor cannot find the cause of her illness which he assures her is likely not serious. However, after sending samples of her urine and her medical file away for a second opinion he learns that she has a fatal tumour that will kill her before long. After learning of the news Henriette calls Heinrich to her home where she allows him to be alone with her for the first time. She tells him she is dying and admits that now she feels alone and unloved just as he described her. She tells him that she would like to enter into the suicide pact with him. Heinrich receives the news rather coldly telling Henriette he hoped that he would meet someone who was willing to die because he wanted to die and not for her own reasons. Reluctantly Heinrich and Henriette head off into the country together hoping to complete their pact. However at the inn where they are staying Heinrich meets an acquaintance and the three are forced to have an awkward dinner together with Heinrich's friend believing they are lovers. The trip is a failure and the two return home.

Heinrich then goes to visit his cousin Marie again who has returned from Paris newly engaged. Heinrich once again asks Marie to die with him and she refuses telling him that though life is stupid and pointless it is important to seek out the good. Having conclusively been rejected by Marie, Heinrich returns to Henriette and tells her he has been thinking of her constantly and asks her to renew their pact. She agrees.

Meanwhile, Henriette's husband, Vogel, returning from a trip to Paris tells Henriette that he showed her file to another doctor who believes she might not have a tumour after all. He asks her to accompany him to Paris where she can receive more advanced medical treatment. Noticing how close Henriette has become to Heinrich he also tells her that he would respect her choice if she decided to leave him for Heinrich. Henriette dismisses the idea calling Heinrich selfish.

Heinrich arrives at the Vogel house in order to usher Henriette away so they can die together. Henriette is reluctant to go but Vogel insists that the exercise and fresh air will be good for her. They tell Heinrich that there is a possibility that Henriette will live as they are planning to go to Paris to see another doctor.

Heinrich and Henriette go off together and stay the night at an inn where Heinrich reads a poem to Henriette and apologizes for ever doubting her. The next day they head off into the woods. Henriette begins to tell Heinrich that she had something to say the previous day but before she can finish her thought he shoots and kills her. Preparing to shoot himself in the head he fires twice only to have the gun not function both times.

After learning of the death of his wife Vogel searches his desk for a letter and eventually finds the note that Henriette wrote to him before her first planned suicide attempt hidden in a drawer. Going into the woods he is able to see both Henriette and Heinrich's bodies still lying out in the open.

Returning home Vogel learns from Henriette's physician that an autopsy revealed that Henriette was in good health with no tumour or ulcer. Vogel realizes that her symptoms were caused by love after all.

Cast[edit]

Production[edit]

The film was produced by Coop99 Filmproduktion in collaboration with Germany's Essential Filmproduktion and Luxembourg's Amour Fou.[2] A great deal of research was put into the costumes and production design in order to avoid clichés seen in many period films. Hausner wanted a clear aesthetic with a lot of yellow and red colours. One source of inspiration for the visual style was the paintings of Johannes Vermeer.[3] Filming took place in Luxembourg, Germany and Austria from February to October 2013.[4]

Reception[edit]

On review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds an approval rating of 89%, based on 47 reviews, and an average rating of 7.2/10. The website's critical consensus reads, "Amour Fou risks overpowering its deceptively impactful story with its remarkable visuals, but ultimately forms a fascinating whole."[5] On Metacritic, the film has a weighted average score of 69 out of 100, based on 15 critics, indicating "generally favorable reviews".[6]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "2014 Official Selection". Cannes Film Festival. 17 April 2014. Archived from the original on 19 April 2014. Retrieved 17 April 2014.
  2. ^ "Amour Fou". Austrian Film Commission. Archived from the original on 23 March 2014. Retrieved 23 March 2014.
  3. ^ Schiefer, Karin (April 2013). "Jessica Hausner dreht Amour Fou: Katharina Wöppermann (Setdesign) und Tanja Hausner (Kostüm) im Gespräch". AFC Newsletter (in German). Austrian Film Commission. Archived from the original on 23 March 2014. Retrieved 23 April 2014.
  4. ^ "Amour Fou". Austrian Film Institute. Retrieved 23 March 2014.
  5. ^ "Amour Fou (2015)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango Media. Retrieved 22 August 2018.
  6. ^ "Amour Fou Reviews". Metacritic. CBS Interactive. Retrieved 26 June 2018.

2024년 6월 2일 일요일

Why I’ll Still Put 'Asian' On College Applications Even If It Costs Me Admission | HuffPost HuffPost Personal

Why I’ll Still Put 'Asian' On College Applications Even If It Costs Me Admission | HuffPost HuffPost Personal

HUFFPOST PERSONAL
Why I’ll Still Put 'Asian' On College Applications Even If It Costs Me Admission
A life where I am not Indian is a life where I am not myself.
By Rebecca L. Stevenson, Guest Writer
Jul 4, 2018, 08:31 AM EDT
Updated Mar 14, 2024




The author and her parents.
REBECCA STEVENSON


When it comes to identity, most think “who are you?” The question I’ve consistently heard is, “what are you?”


Some insist I’m Brazilian and others guess I’m from the Middle East, but my mom’s Indian and my dad’s white. While being biracial has kept me constantly aware of both my ethnicities, the college admissions process has sparked an identity crisis.
ADVERTISEMENT



In seventh grade, it started. “You could apply for a Hispanic scholarship,” my sister said at the dinner table, half-jokingly, “since Mom’s maiden name is Fernandez and most people think you look Hispanic.”


There isn’t anything Hispanic about my identity; my mom’s maiden name only stems from Portuguese missionaries in her Indian village. Even in seventh grade, I knew who I was — part white, but not quite. I was aware my white friends probably weren’t wearing churidars to their Christmas celebrations. I could smell that their mothers’ cooking certainly had fewer spices. And as I gathered from their constant invitations to hang out, their parents weren’t nearly as strict about homework, grades or performance.

00:02 / 00:15
ANKMI





I was Indian-American and I had no problem with that.


I was realizing that according to colleges, however, to have Indian blood is to be robotic, passionless and devoid of personality. Harvard, for example, is the pinnacle of education but apparently not fond of the personalities of Asians. To suspect a bias against Asian-American students is one thing. But to realize that the perception of coming up short in having a “positive personality” and being “widely respected” contributes to a 24 percent decrease in accepted Asian-Americans is another.


Harvard’s dismissal of Asians feels like a high school popularity contest — as if the elite school is telling me, “No matter how hard or passionately you work on your education, unless you’re liked you’ll only be that nerdy Indian kid.”

Naturally, I dodged from these stereotypes and disadvantages and searched for other routes to my college dreams.



“I was realizing that according to colleges, however, to have Indian blood is to be robotic, passionless and devoid of personality”


The advice continued to float by in high school, though. An article popped up about a company that helps with college applications that advised top students to “appear less Asian.” The evidence was piling up — getting into an elite college meant hiding my ethnicity. It was a hurtful message. Apparently, the culture I loved and lived with was unappreciated and disdained. Still, college was my goal and so I convinced myself: I could just be white!


At the start of junior year, however, I stopped being so sure. As I perused college essay questions, the words “background” and “identity” kept popping up. I pictured paragraphs on being biracial and bilingual. I knew the adaptability, open-mindedness and cultural knowledge central to my identity was thanks to my heritage. Learning my mother’s native tongue, Malayalam, had opened me up to the world. I was so grateful and proud of my heritage.


Just as quickly as I had these fond thoughts, I deleted my imaginary paragraphs. It felt like I was deleting myself but if I answered these questions instinctively and truthfully, I’d give away my Asian ethnicity and, according to all my gathered statistics and advice, possibly cost myself a college admission.


The author and her mother.
REBECCA STEVENSON


But here was my dilemma: There was no question I could figure out how to entirely answer without being Indian. I couldn’t communicate my personal identity with colleges without revealing my ethnicity. Since birth, I had been explaining my heritage to confused faces with pride, and my unpracticed attempt in hiding it only left me feeling ashamed.


I decided to take a different approach — I would be the very best Asian I could be. Khan Academy’s SAT prep replaced my social life and became a constant companion. The SAT transformed into a desperate idol and the numbers became the defining factor of my identity.


But numbers are not reliable and the identity sharply shattered when the marks for my first SAT came in more than 100 points below my target. I had failed in making a stellar SAT score part of my identity. Still, the relentlessly hard-working Indian culture predictably prodded me forward without hesitation. So I picked up the pieces of my fallen pride, studied again with renewed humility and received a score over my initial goal. But then what? My obsession didn’t stop. I wasn’t satisfied.


My supposed embracing of Asian stereotypes had led me to a path of dangerous idolization. Where I was once content with personal devotion and honest ambition, I became concerned with college success by whatever means necessary. My mother and her culture had, throughout my life, encouraged me to work hard, study hard and pursue what I love. However, I had pushed away my true heritage, as well as the words of my parents, and allowed the college and media stereotypes of a culture to pressure me and define my identity.

The truth — the truth I now realize — is that I am unlike any other Asian. No Asian is like any other Asian. Sure, some work hard on their standardized tests. Some play violin like maestros. Others don’t wish to go to college at all. Regardless, they are all Asian and so am I. How I look on a college application defines neither my identity nor my ethnicity.

“The truth — the truth I now realize — is that I am unlike any other Asian. No Asian is like any other Asian”


My tumultuous journey with college applications during junior year did reveal that I was, whether I liked it or not, Asian. I wasn’t a stereotype but I did have my culture. If I didn’t have an Indian mother, I without a doubt would not have the work ethic that I have. I would not have the love of ancient stories and civilizations that I have. I would not have the awareness of poverty in both the United States and India. A life where I am not Indian is a life where I am not myself.


Why should I hide the beauty of my Indian-American culture? Why should any Asian hide their magnificent heritage? The diversity of Asia includes cultures that no one should be ashamed of. The stereotypical pinpoints of Asian culture, diligence, discipline, and obedience, are only an aspect of Asian culture — and an often noble aspect at that. The stories that each individual Asian student and family have are bound to be more diverse and flavorful than colleges could expect.


My college application doesn’t define my identity. No college is worth hiding who I am. I will write about the beauty of being biracial and the stories from my family home in India. I will enthusiastically share how my Indian heritage has birthed my passions. I will confess who I am entirely, for I am not ashamed. I will be Asian and white and all that I am and if a college doesn’t want to accept that, I don’t want to be there.


Whether it hinders my admission or not, I will be putting “Asian” on my college application.


Have a compelling first-person story you want to share? Send your story description to pitch@huffpost.com.

RELATEDSOCIETY AND CULTURECOLLEGEHARVARD UNIVERSITYHIGHER EDUCATIONCULTURE OF INDIA

Some Universities Are Holding Back Pro-Palestine Student Protestors' Diplomas

I Received An Anonymous Text. With Just 8 Words, It Brought Back The Shame I Thought I'd Buried.

Kourtney Kardashian Had No Idea Controversial Reality Show Moment Was Being Filmed

우리는 왜 김기영의 '하녀'를 보는가 - 오마이스타

우리는 왜 김기영의 '하녀'를 보는가 - 오마이스타

우리는 왜 김기영의 '하녀'를 보는가

[리뷰] 김기영의 <하녀>(1960) 우리는 왜 이 영화를 보는가
김규종(satira)
23.08.01 


▲ 영화 <하녀>(1960) 스틸 이미지 ⓒ 김기영 프로덕션
김기영 감독(1919~1998)은 살아생전에 경험하지 못한 유명세를 고인이 된 후에 누린 특이한 이력의 소유자다. 1960년 개봉 영화 <하녀>가 서울에서만 10만 관객을 동원하여 성공을 거둔다. 그 이전에 연출한 영화는 1955년 데뷔작 <주검의 상자>를 비롯해 모두 7편이지만, 딱히 주목할 만한 작품은 없다. 따라서 <하녀>는 김기영의 출세작이자 대표작인 셈이다.

1960년대 한국 영화의 황금기 이후 군사정권의 검열과 영화 관객의 지속적인 감소로 1970년대 한국 영화는 기나긴 침체기에 접어든다. 영화계는 김기영이 연출한 <충녀>(1972)와 <이어도>(1977)를 1970년대 한국 영화 걸작선 반열에 올려놓는다. 하지만 1980년대 이후 1998년 작고하기 전까지 김기영은 대중에게 망각(忘却)된 감독으로 남아 있었다.

인생의 전변(轉變)은 인간의 의지와 무관하게 진행되는 법이고, 김기영도 예외가 아니다. 1996년에 시작된 '부산국제영화제'가 잊힌 김기영을 되살려낸다. 영화제 '회고전'으로 김기영의 작품이 상영되면서 일본과 미국, 프랑스와 도이칠란트 등지에서 새로운 관객이 생겨난다. 김기영 사후에 '베를린국제영화제'와 프랑스의 '시네마테크 프랑세즈'는 김기영의 유작 영화를 상영한다.

<하녀>는 한국영상자료원과 마틴 스코세이지 감독의 '세계영화재단'의 노력으로 2008년 복원된다. <하녀>는 같은 해 '칸국제영화제' 회고작으로 초대받아 상영된다. 오늘날 한국의 박찬욱과 봉준호, 류승완, 미국의 스코세이지 감독이 김기영 감독의 열혈팬이라 자부하고 있으며, <미나리>로 아카데미 여우조연상을 받은 윤여정도 김기영을 소환하는 형편이다.

김기영 감독은 모두 32편의 영화를 연출했는데, 1950년대 7편, 1960년대 9편, 1970년대 10편, 1980년대 5편, 1990년대 1편이다. 동시대 영화감독 김수용이 1960년대 연출한 영화가 37편이고, 신상옥이 연출한 영화가 49편에 이를 정도로 다작(多作)이었던 반면에, 김기영은 현저한 과작(寡作)의 영화인으로 남아 있다. '작가주의'를 향한 김기영의 고집 때문이었을까?!

<하녀>의 시공간과 등장인물

1960년 서울은 어떤 모습이었을까?! <하녀>에서 우리는 손에 잡힐 듯한 서울과 만날 수 있을까?! 결론부터 말하면 전혀 아니다! 김기영은 서울의 그때와 그 모습을 재연하는 것에 그다지 관심이 없기 때문이다. 그는 '사실주의'에 기초한 시공간 구축, 개연성에 터를 둔 인물들의 관계와 갈등 설정, 사회-역사적인 맥락에서 당대를 읽어내고 영화화하는 작업에 무심하다.

한국 관객에게 익숙한 사실주의 개념으로 <하녀>를 들여다보면 곳곳에 허방다리와 실망의 덫이 부설돼 있다. 수많은 불륜 드라마에 열광하고 일상적 미니멀리즘의 충실한 애호가이자 추종자라면 <하녀>는 극약과 같은 영화다. 방직공장 여공이 여대생처럼 택시를 타고 다니며 우아하게 피아노 개인교습을 받고, 맨발의 하녀가 구두 신은 주인과 전희(前戲)에 몸을 떠는 장면을 어찌할 것인가?!

따라서 막연하고 추상적으로 <하녀>에 그려진 1960년 서울을 상상해보는 편이 관객의 정신건강에 이로울 터다. 방직공장 여공들을 대상으로 피아노 연주와 합창 지도로 생계를 꾸려가는 가장 동식. 밤낮으로 재봉틀을 돌려가며 부업으로 2층 양옥집을 짓는 데 성공하는 착하면서도 악착같은 아내. 잘생긴 음악선생을 흠모하여 편지 보냈다가 억울한 마음에 자살해버리는 여공 선영.

선영을 부추겨 편지를 보내게 하고는 정작 자신이 그에게 열렬하게 구애하는 화려한 옷차림의 여공 조경희. 대걸레로 공장 바닥을 청소하다가 동식의 집에 하녀로 들어온 명숙의 느닷없는 육체적이고 정신적인 갈망. 장애아로 그려진 맏딸 애순과 그런 애순을 놀리는 남동생 동순의 어설픈 대사와 거친 몸짓에 담긴 허망한 유희의 그늘. 이런 불협화로 촘촘하게 엮인 영화가 <하녀>다.

일부 관객은 <하녀>에 그려진 방직공장의 깔끔함과 화려함, 동식의 집에 들어온 대형 진공관 흑백 텔레비전에 혀를 내두를 것이다. 여기에 이질감을 덧대는 대목이 있으니, 선영의 연애편지를 들고 동식이 찾아간 사람은 공장의 기숙사 사감이고, 그녀는 준열하게 선영을 나무라며 사흘의 정직을 선언한다. 그야말로 당대 일류 여자대학의 기숙사와 사감의 면모와 행태를 유감없이 드러내는 것이다.

2층 양옥도 모자라 부부가 들여놓는 텔레비전은 어떤 의미인가?! 1960년대 세계 최빈국 대한민국의 서울 중산층에 편입되고자 열망한 동식 내외의 수입원을 생각할 때 말도 아니 되는 설정이다. 집을 짓고 난 후 부족한 돈 때문에 과외로 피아노 개인교습을 해야 하는 동식과 밤낮으로 재봉틀을 돌리는 아내의 수입으로 텔레비전을 산다는 어불성설의 신화적 상황!

1960년 11월 3일 개봉한 영화 <하녀>에서 당대 시대상을 포착하는 것은 애초에 불가능한 노릇이다. 그것은 감독 자신의 말에도 드러난다. "인간의 본능을 해부하면 검은 피가 난다. 그것이 욕망이다." 혹은 "나는 무슨 주의 같은 것을 젊은 시절부터 싫어했다." 반면에 그는 마르크스와 프로이트를 존경한 인물로 알려져 있다. 이런 '모순'이 그를 이해하는 열쇠가 된다.

사건과 갈등

<하녀>의 모든 사건과 갈등의 중심에 명숙이 자리한다. 애순과 동순을 이어 태기(胎氣)가 있는 데다가, 집도 커진 동식의 아내가 하녀를 요구한다. 공장에서도 낮은 곳에 서식하면서 바닥을 청소하던 명숙을 경희는 동식 내외에게 '착하기는 하지만 모자란 여자'로 소개한다. 실제로 명숙은 뭔가 빠진 듯한 표정과 동작을 보이고, 새로 온 집에 아무런 이질적인 반응을 보이지 않고 즉각 먹을 것을 찾는다.

바닥 생활을 전전하던 명숙의 거처는 신축 양옥 2층이며, 그녀의 맞은편 공간에는 피아노가 있다. 동식은 제 몸처럼 피아노를 아끼고, 명숙에게는 손도 대지 못하도록 한다. 명숙은 친구처럼 여기는 경희가 개인교습을 받으러 올 때마다 질투와 선망을 경험한다. 교습을 핑계로 동식에게 온몸을 던지는 경희와 그녀를 거부하는 동식의 신파성 일장활극이 명숙의 눈앞에서 전개된다.

이 장면이 <하녀>의 등장인물들이 겪게 될 운명적인 전변(轉變)을 예비한다. 동식은 오로지 아내와 아이들만 바라보면서 살아가는 소시민의 전형이다. 선영의 연애편지를 자신의 생각과 의지가 아니라, 기숙사 사감에게 전달하여 판단하도록 하는 그의 태도가 그것을 입증한다. 반면에 그의 아내는 남편의 내조뿐만 아니라, 집안 중대사에 관한 결정권을 독점하고 있다.

이들을 파국의 구렁텅이로 몰아넣게 되는 불가항력의 일탈은 바닥 모를 심연까지 도달한 연후에야 비로소 멈춘다. 하녀 명숙의 요구와 지배권은 나날이 강력하고 모질어진다. 그녀는 동식의 첩이자 애인 나아가 아내 자리까지 탐하고, 동식과 동침하는 권리도 쟁취한다. 이런 사건 진척의 근저에 자리하는 것이 '가정'과 '새집'을 지키려는 아내의 욕망이다.

그녀의 욕망은 아들을 살해한 명숙의 협박에 더욱 빛을 발한다. 살인자가 적반하장격으로 부부를 경찰에 신고하여 가정을 파탄 내겠다고 하자 하녀에게 굴종하면서 가정을 지키려는 맹목적인 아내. 그녀의 욕망만큼 허망하게 다가오는 것이 명숙의 끝없는 집착과 탐욕이다. 그녀는 동식 내외의 집안을 완전 소유함으로써 신축 양옥의 인간적-물적 기반 전체를 독점-지배하고자 한다.

탐욕은 분노를 낳고, 분노는 어리석음을 잉태한다. 신기루의 사막에서 영원히 채워지지 않는 갈증처럼 동식의 사랑과 육체를 탐하지만, 명숙은 그와 함께 죽음으로써 최후의 지배권 확립을 시도한다. 지상에서 이룰 수 없는 절정의 탐욕에서 태어난 분노에 치를 떨면서 그녀는 동식에게 동반자살을 요구한다. 죽어서라도 동식과 하나 되고자 욕망하는 명숙이 도달한 기이하고 어리석은 결론.

여러 면에서 <하녀>는 기괴하지만, 두 인물의 자살 장면은 동식의 내면과 상충되어 아주 혼란스럽다. 하녀의 호출을 받고, 혹은 아내의 허락이나 명령에 따라 그녀들의 거주공간인 1-2층을 오르내리는 그가 극단적인 선택 직후에 아내를 향한 순애보를 선보인다. 하녀를 향한 오래도록 참았던 분노의 폭발인가, 아니면 죽음 직전에 분출한 최후의 단말마 같은 저항인가?!

<하녀>를 이채롭게 하는 장치



▲ 영화 <하녀>(1960) 스틸 이미지 ⓒ 김기영 프로덕션
<안개>와 <장군의 수염>처럼 <하녀>의 실내공간은 양키 아메리카인들의 거주공간을 빼닮았다. 등장인물들은 구두와 하이힐을 신고 방을 드나들고 담배꽁초도 함부로 버리고 비벼 끈다.

<안개>의 공간이 무진의 들판과 가옥을 중심으로 설정되어 평면적이고 단순하지만, <장군의 수염>에서 김철훈이 살아가는 2층은 주인집 모녀의 1층과 완전히 분리됨으로써 주인공의 고독과 소외를 강조하는 효과를 불러온다. 반면에 <하녀>에 설정된 복층의 공간은 여주인과 하녀, 하녀와 가장의 대립과 갈등을 낳고, 1층과 2층 사이의 중간지대인 계단도 사건 진행에서 중요한 구실을 한다.

아내의 공간은 1층으로 고정돼 있고, 그녀를 대표하는 소품은 재봉틀이다. 아내는 재봉틀을 돌리거나, 고단한 살림 혹은 과도한 노동에 따른 육체적 고통으로 괴로워한다. 명숙의 공간은 2층이지만, 언제나 피아노를 열망하고 그것을 두드림으로써 자신의 열망을 숨기지 않는다.

하녀는 주인의 아래에 있는 여자를 의미하는데, 그녀가 2층을 점유하고 있다는 사실은 하녀와 여성 상전의 지위가 실질적으로 역전돼 있음을 보여준다. 두 사람 사이에서 줄타기를 거듭하는 동식은 전통적인 가장의 구실이 아니라, 하녀에게 목줄 잡힌 사냥개 형상이다.

봉준호의 지적처럼 히치콕에게 새가 있다면, 김기영에게는 쥐가 있다. <하녀>에서 가장 인상적인 소품은 쥐와 쥐약이다. 1960년대 한국 전역을 떠돌았던 무수한 쥐와 쥐 잡는 쥐약이 <하녀>의 처음부터 끝까지 동행한다. 아내는 쥐의 등장에 소스라칠 정도로 심약하지만, 하녀는 맨손으로 쥐 꼬리를 잡고 흔들 만큼 담대하다. 하녀와 안주인의 대비가 현저한 장면이다.

쥐를 잡을 쥐약으로 자살의 길을 택한 1960년대 한국인은 수없이 많았다. 저렴한 가격으로 손쉽게 구할 수 있는 쥐약은 생활고와 신병, 실패한 사랑으로 괴로운 사람들의 마지막 출구였다. 하지만 <하녀>에서 쥐약은 살인과 타의에 따른 동반자살의 기제로 쓰임으로써 쥐약 본래의 기능과 무관하다. 명숙과 쥐 그리고 쥐약의 연관성이 현저하다는 사실에 주목해야 한다.

신석기 농업혁명 이후 인간을 괴롭혀온 쥐와 인간의 유구한 대결은 아직도 진행형이다. 세계의 심장이라 불리는 뉴욕처럼 쥐로 인해 아직도 심각하게 괴로운 지역이 세계 곳곳에 자리하기 때문이다. 쥐는 인간의 생산물을 축내고 망치며, 페스트 같은 전염병을 전파하는 주범이다. 안정적인 거주-생활 조건을 파괴하는 틈입자(闖入者)로서 쥐는 인류의 연면부절한 불청객이자 적대적인 존재로 인식된다.

명숙은 동식 내외가 가사노동에 필요한 존재로 돈을 주고 불러온 유용한 인물이다. 그런데 시간이 흐름에 따라 명숙은 인간에서 파괴적인 쥐로 변신해간다. 그녀는 자신과 동렬에 있지 않은 경희나 동식의 아내와 같은 높은 수준을 바란다.

나아가 그녀들을 능가하는 높이에서 그들뿐 아니라, 동식까지도 지배하려 한다. 그런 과정에서 쥐약으로 동순을 살해하고 동반자살도 주저하지 않는다. 마룻바닥과 찬장에서 천장에 이르기까지 서식하는 쥐와 바닥을 닦다가 이층 양옥을 독점하는 명숙 사이의 거리는 그다지 멀지 않아 보인다.

여기 더해 김기영이 연출한 계단 장면이 인상적이다. 아내 곁의 죽음을 고집하는 동식과 그를 저지하려는 명숙 사이의 실랑이 끝에 동식이 계단을 따라 그녀를 끌고 내려온다. 계단 하나하나에 머리를 부딪치면서 점차 정신을 잃어가는 명숙. 동식이 아내 곁에서 남편이자 아버지로 죽음을 맞이할 때, 명숙은 계단 하단 지점에서 온몸이 축 늘어진 채 쥐처럼 널브러져 있다.

1층도 아니고 2층도 아닌 중간지점에서 시체로 화하는 명숙. 이 지점에서 명숙은 지배자도 아니고, 하녀도 아니며, 인간도 아니고, 쥐도 아닌 채 뒤범벅된 제삼자(第三者)가 된다. 쥐로 사람들을 놀라게 하고, 쥐약으로 자신을 포함한 타자들을 죽인 명숙은 쥐와 인간 사이의 기괴한 존재로 생을 마감한다. <하녀>에서 김기영이 실현한 그로테스크 미학의 정점이다.

낯설고 뜨악한 결말?!

<하녀>는 정점에서 멈추지 않는다. 동식의 육체와 사랑을 욕망한 선영과 명숙이 죽고, 중산층에서 더 높은 곳을 욕망한 아내가 쓰러지고, 그런 아내와 하녀의 틈바구니에서 고통받던 동식이 죽어 나가고, 그의 어리지만 야비한 아들 동순마저 죽었는데 영화는 끝나지 않는다. 아직 아닌가, 하는 관객들의 뜨악한 표정이 이어지고, 이윽고 동식이 환한 얼굴로 담배를 피우며 살아난다.

신문을 읽던 아내가 남편에게 남자들의 저급한 욕망을 힐난한다. 교양과 인격 있는 남자가 하녀한테 유혹당한다는 일이 이해되지 않는다는 것이다. 하지만 동식의 생각은 다르다. 그것이야말로 남자의 속성이라고 그는 주장한다. 여자를 보면 남자는 원시로 돌아가고 싶어 한다는 동식의 말에 아내는 '하녀는 범의 입에 날고기'라고 응수하며 명숙을 앞세우고 안방을 나간다.

마침내 동식은 객석을 향해 점잖게 일갈한다. "남자는 나이가 들수록 젊은 여자를 두고 생각을 많이 하는 법이죠. 그러다가 잘못 걸려들기도 하고, 패가망신하기도 하는 법이죠. 누구나 매한가집니다." 이 놀라운 자세 전환은 무엇을 뜻하는가?! 혹자의 말처럼 <하녀>가 5.16 군사쿠데타 이후 관객을 교육하는 용도의 1960년대 계몽영화로 전락한 것인가?!

김기영은 그런 의도로 마지막 장면을 만든 것이 아니다. 그에게는 나름의 복안이 있다. 죽은 인물이 살아나 관객에게 말을 걸고, 넌지시 충고까지 하는 장면은 일반적인 영화와 결이 아주 다르다. 그래서 영화배급업자들의 요구에 감독이 돈 때문에 순응한 결과라는 주장도 있다. 설핏 그럴듯하다. 하지만 작가주의로 일관한 김기영의 생애를 보면 뭔가 석연치 않다.

딱 한 번의 일탈로 자식과 가정이 파탄 나고, 자신마저 생과 작별하고 돌아오지 못하는 먼 길 떠나야 했던 주인공의 신산(辛酸)한 삶에서 일상의 개연성을 찾는 관객은 많지 않다. '영화니까!' 하는 관객이 많을 것은 당연지사. 문제는 영화 같은 일이 현실에서 벌어진다는 것이다. 아차 하는 순간, 누구나 무너질 수밖에 없는 치명적인 상황이 언제든 일어날 수 있는 것이다. '그러니 방심하지 마시라!'

이런 사실을 엄숙하고 근엄하게 설교조로 늘어놓으면 그것은 문자 그대로 계몽이 된다. 하지만 동식은 편안하고 여유로운 자세와 목소리와 표정으로 지나가듯 가볍게 덧붙인다. 누구에게나 있을 법한 일이므로 당신도 예외가 아니라는 사실을 웃으면서 슬며시 일깨운다. 이것을 가리켜 '낯설게 하기'라 한다.

우리가 자명하다고 여기는 명제나 윤리-도덕, 생활 습관이나 판단기준 등에 낯선 시선과 인식 방법을 제시함으로써 자명한 이치를 낯설게 하는 방식이 '낯설게 하기'다. 영화가 끝났는데, 왜 다시 시작하는 거지?! 아니, 김기영이 낡아빠진 설교를 영화 말미에 삽입했다고?! 여러 억측을 불러일으킨 감독이 의도한 최종적인 목표지점은 무엇일까, 다시 생각한다.

아버지가 죽었는데도 그다지 어리지 않은 딸은 침대에서 깊은 잠에 곯아떨어져 있다. 창밖에는 굵은 비가 쉬지 않고 내리고, 비바람을 뚫고 열차가 굉음을 울리며 철로를 질주한다. 그리고 갓난아이의 커다란 울음소리가 두 구의 시신을 앞에 두고 울려 퍼진다. 그들의 죽음이 저지하지 못하는 생을 향한 무한질주와 간절한 희구가 어제와 내일처럼 공존한다. <하녀> 마지막 직전 장면은 그야말로 압권이다.

아내의 독백이 이 장면을 빛내준다. '내가 새집을 탐내지 않았으면 이런 일은 없었을 텐데.' 이것은 성실한 가정주부이자 세 아이의 엄마이며 자상한 소시민 남편의 아내가 욕망한 새집이 불러일으킨 참사를 반성적으로 돌아보는 독백이다. 남편의 죽음에 담긴 의미와 성찰보다 자신의 죄업을 먼저 책망하는 아내의 맹목적인 반성이 남편의 시신 옆에서 고요하게 이뤄진다.

삶에 내재한 모순과 부조리를 아프도록 그려내는 김기영. 그가 다시 반전을 준비한다. 사자(死者)를 이 세상에 귀환시킴으로써 지금까지 진행된 사건과 갈등과 죽음을 무화(無化)함으로써 부조리와 모순을 극대화하는 것이다. 그리고 이것은 적잖은 위력을 가진다. 인간 세상과 인생에 담긴 본원적인 아이러니의 그림자 한 자락을 우리에게 휙, 소리 나게 던졌으므로!
덧붙이는 글저의 네이버 블로그 <시대로 열린 창>에 올렸습니다.