Lesley McLachlan
https://www.facebook.com/lesley.mclachlan.5/posts/2023529567795831?comment_id=2024001847748603&reply_comment_id=2024022217746566¬if_id=1625871027428616¬if_t=mentions_reply&ref=notif
Māori babies were five times more likely to end up in state care than non-Māori last year and their rate of urgent entries into state care has doubled since 2010, official figures show.
/// Māori people:
...
Socioeconomic issues
Māori on average have fewer assets than the rest of the population, and run greater risks of many negative economic and social outcomes. Over 50 per cent of Māori live in areas in the three highest deprivation deciles, compared with 24 per cent of the rest of the population.[150]
Although Māori make up only 14 per cent of the population, they make up almost 50 per cent of the prison population.[151] Māori have higher unemployment rates than other cultures resident in New Zealand, which is believed to partially account for their over-representation in the criminal justice system; many young Māori, finding themselves unemployed, are picked up for alcohol-related behaviours or small crimes such as vandalism.[152] Underemployment is in turn attributed to persistent institutional racism in New Zealand.[153][154]
"Only 47 per cent of Māori school-leavers finish school with qualifications higher than NCEA Level One; compared to 74 per cent European; 87 per cent Asian."[155] Although New Zealand rates very well globally in the PISA rankings that compare national performance in reading, science and maths, "once you disaggregate the PISA scores, Pakeha students are second in the world and Māori are 34th."[156] At the 2018 New Zealand census, 25.3% of Māori aged 15 and over had no formal qualifications, compared to 17.1% for non-Māori New Zealanders, and only 12.5% of Māori have a bachelor's degree or higher, compared to 26.8% of non-Māori.[157]
Also, a recent[when?] study by the New Zealand Family Violence Clearinghouse showed that Māori women and children are more likely to experience domestic violence than any other ethnic group.[158]
Health
In 2017-19, life expectancy for Māori in New Zealand was 73.4 years for males and 77.1 years for females, compared to 80.9 years for non-Māori males and 84.4 years for non-Māori females, a difference of 7.5 and 7.3 years respectively.[159][160] However, Māori have a wide range of life expectancies across regions: Māori living in the Marlborough region have the highest life expectancy at 79.9 years for males and 83.4 years for females, while Māori living in the Gisborne region have the lowest life expectancy at 71.2 years for males and 75.2 years for females.[160]
Māori suffer more health problems, including higher levels of alcohol and drug abuse, smoking and obesity. Less frequent use of healthcare services mean that late diagnosis and treatment intervention lead to higher levels of morbidity and mortality in many manageable conditions.[161][162][163] Compared with non-Māori, Māori people experience higher rates of heart disease, strokes, most cancers, respiratory diseases, rheumatic fever, suicide and self-harm, and infant deaths.[164]
In April 2021, the government announced the creation of the first dedicated Māori Health Authority[165] "with the power to directly commission health services for Māori and to partner with Health NZ in other aspects of the health system".[166]
/// Standard of living: Standard of living is the level of income, comforts and services available, generally applied to a society or location, rather than to an individual.[1] Standard of living is relevant because it is considered to contribute to an individual's quality of life.[2] Standard of living is generally concerned with objective metrics outside an individual's personal control, such as economic, societal, political and environmental matters – such things that an individual might consider when evaluating where to live in the world, or when assessing the success of economic policy.
It is affected by factors such as the quality and availability of employment, class disparity, poverty rate, quality and housing affordability, hours of work required to purchase necessities, gross domestic product, inflation rate, amount of leisure time, access to and quality of healthcare, quality and availability of education, literacy rates, life expectancy, occurrence of diseases, cost of goods and services, infrastructure, access to, quality and affordability of public transportation, national economic growth, economic and political stability, freedom, environmental quality, climate and safety. For the purposes of economics, politics and policy, it is usually compared across time or between groups defined by social, economic or geographical parameters.
/// Children's Commissioner Act 2003:
...
The Children's Commissioner, an office equivalent to that known in other countries as the Children's Ombudsman, conducts investigations as to whether the rights or welfare of a child or children have been prejudiced.
Children's Commissioners:
...
Judge Andrew Becroft
1 July 2016 – date
Born in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Judge Becroft was made a District Court Judge in 1996. In 2001, he became the Principal Judge of the Youth Court of New Zealand.
Māori babies five times more likely to end up in state care - stats
RNZ.CO.NZ
Māori babies five times more likely to end up in state care - stats
Māori babies were five times more likely to end up in state care than non-Māori last year and their rate of urgent entries into state care has doubled since 2010, official figures show.
22 comments
Lesley McLachlan
2020 ... In that same period, 61 Māori babies were ordered into state care before they were born, compared to ... 21 non-Māori.
Children's Commissioner Judge Andrew Becroft released the statistics this morning as part of a widescale inquiry into the removal of Māori babies, aged up to three months old, by the state.
That age group had been selected because that was where the statistics showed there were problems, and because it was a crucial bonding time for mother and child.
Judge Becroft said the figures raised clear questions about racism and bias within the state care sector.
"I've said previously that it's impossible to factor out the enduring legacy of colonisation... or modern day systemic bias," he said.
"Now that, to some extent, will obviously be at play here as it is across all decision-making and all government departments."
The inequities for Māori had grown over time and continued to worsen, Judge Becroft said.
In 2018, the rate of state custody for Māori under the age of 18 was almost seven times higher than non-Māori, up from five times higher in 2014.
Judge Becroft said another concerning statistic was that the rate of urgent entries into state care for Māori babies had doubled since 2010.
In comparison, the rate for non-Māori had not changed.
Urgent entries were most often made without notice or family knowledge, for what were considered to be serious safety concerns.
Judge Becroft said the fact urgent applications were being made at such a high rate was something his office would examine closely.
"These stats reveal clearly, I think for the first time to the whole country, what is really going on and how concerning the problem is," he said.
"The question as to why, is one that is occupying the minds of all those involved in three different inquiries."
"We are really committed to drilling down as to why these stats are continuing, in almost all cases, to get worse, and why the inequities are so profound," Becroft said.
"But the first step for us was to ask what is actually happening? What do the stats really show?"
Speaking to RNZ's Summer Report, midwife Jean Te Huia said the problem wasn't with Oranga Tamariki itself, but a lack of support and education for whānau.
Te Huia was the midwife of the mother whose baby Oranga Tamariki tried to take in Hastings early last year - sparking investigations into the processes around uplifting children.
"I think that's it's disappointing that these statistics have been around for generations," she said. "When we look at the percentage, almost 48 percent of those pregnant women whose pēpi are Māori who have been taken, their parents themselves were in care. So we have an intergenerational problem and an issue which the state has been unable and unwilling to tackle."
She also pointed out that while Māori made up over 69 percent of babies taken, the others were often Pasifika and other nationalities, rather than Pākehā.
"This is a brown problem, this is a problem where we have poverty, lack of housing. We don't have support for good kaupapa Māori antenatal education for these young mums, we have an insidious problem where whānau don't have education.
"We have problems that far outweigh the need to improve a child welfare system."
But Oranga Tamariki deputy chief executive Hoani Lambert said the ministry couldn't bring those numbers down on its own.
"Oranga Tamariki, unfortunately, is the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff. What we need to make sure is that we're working with other government agencies to look at issues with housing, employment, supporting young Māori parents to be able to work through relationship issues without exposing their children to violence."
The first full report is due to be released later this year.
Tags:
Te Ao Māori inequality ///
· Reply · 10 h
Lesley McLachlan
New Zealand Human Rights Commission backs overhaul of care for at-risk Māori children
Commissioner Meng Foon calls for end to ‘systemic bias’ against Māori in justice, health and education: New Zealand’s Children’s Commissioner earlier called for the total ‘transformation of the statutory care and protection system’ for children in the country.
Tue 24 Nov 2020 03.05 GMT
The Human Rights Commission has thrown its support behind calls by the Children’s Commissioner for urgent action to keep at-risk Māori children with their wider whanau or family.
Speaking on behalf of the Human Rights Commission, the race relations commissioner, Meng Foon, said he backed the approach, saying it would uphold indigenous rights of Māori through self-determination.
“This transformative approach is needed by the government for a host of issues affecting tangata whenua [people of the land] – in justice, health, education and so forth,” said Foon, who is fluent in te reo Māori.
The two-part report found that Māori infants were five times more likely to be taken into state custody than non-Māori, often in traumatic circumstances – including from maternity wards involving the police.
Foon noted that the report highlighted persistent inequities that affect Māori, including intergenerational harm being done to Māori children and whānau (family), and how this collides with entrenched disadvantage, colonisation and systemic bias.
“Such systemic bias needs to go,” Foon said.
New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has promised to make her country the best in the world to grow up in.
Study shows nearly one in four New Zealand children reported to welfare agencies
Read more
Māori children make up about 65% of children in state care – even though Māori comprise just 16.5% of New Zealand’s population.
Oranga Tamariki, the government department charged with investigating claims of child neglect and abuse in New Zealand, has been described as dangerous and racist by Children’s Commissioner, Andrew Becroft, who has urged the government to transfer child welfare powers of its own children to Māori.
“The key recommendation in this report, is for a total transformation of the statutory care and protection system,” said Becroft.
“By that I mean nothing short of a ‘by Māori, for Māori’ approach and a transfer of responsibility, resources and power from the state to appropriate Māori entities, as determined by Māori.”
Both the prime minister, Jacinda Ardern, and children’s minister, Kelvin Davis, have responded saying it was important to walk alongside Māori, but stopped short of any discussion of a transfer of power.
The operations of Oranga Tamariki have long drawn the wrath of Māori elders, with large public demonstrations held in 2019 calling for an end to baby uplifts by the state.
“There’s been unprecedented breaches of human rights,” Naida Glavish, the head of a Māori-led inquiry into the practices of Oranga Tamariki, told the Guardian earlier this year.
Glavish said there have been cases of women’s babies being taken into custody over the cleanliness of the mother’s home, or their past records, even though they had changed their behaviour, and the gang affiliations of former partners.
Glavish also accused the agency of not allowing extended Māori families to care for children – an established cultural practice – when relatives thought that was the best option.
“For us here there is no way that we are actually going to allow it to continue,” Glavish said. “We’ve reached a stage where enough is enough.”
In a statement, Oranga Tamariki said it had seen a 50% drop in the number of Māori infants coming into care in the last two years, but any decision on a transfer of power was one for the government.
The statement noted that the Waitangi Tribunal was currently assessing whether Oranga Tamariki legislation, policies and practices are consistent with the Treaty of Waitangi, with specific regard to the disproportionate numbers of tamariki Māori being taken into state care.
Becroft said it was “very heartening” that minister for children Kelvin Davis, who is Māori, “has committed to ‘fixing’ the state care and protection system”.
“Our view, however, after extensive inquiry, is that it is unlikely that Oranga Tamariki or any other iteration of it, can deliver care and protection interventions and services in a way that will be most effective for tamariki (children) and whānau Māori,” Becroft said.
“I believe only Māori can do this for Māori in a way that will deliver the best and enduring outcomes for tamariki.” (guardian)
· Reply · 9 h · Edited
Lesley McLachlan
2021 State care expert hits out at 'prison-like' Oranga Tamariki care and protection residences, backs call to close all facilities: A state care expert is backing the Children's Commissioner's suggestion to close all Oranga Tamariki care and protection residences as soon as possible, saying they're "prison-like" and are "far from therapeutic".
It comes after footage provided to Newsroom showed staff at an Oranga Tamariki care and protection residence in Christchurch using unapproved restraint techniques on a child. The video prompted Oranga Tamariki to trigger its Child Protection Protocol - which gets police involved - stand down staff members and, on Thursday, announce it was closing the facility.
Care experience consultant Tupua Urlich says the care and protection facilities "have no place in Aotearoa".
"They're prison-like, they're far from therapeutic, and as we saw on camera last week, abuse is taking place," he told The Hui on Monday.
"But this is not a one-off incident, that's really what I need to emphasise here, this is not a one-off, this is just the first time it's been caught on camera."
Urlich says it isn't just Minister for Children Kelvin Davis who is "guilty" of seeing children in state care as "less than children", New Zealanders are too.
"We are talking about children here, and it's not just the minister who's guilty of it, our whole country is guilty of looking at children in state care as less than children, and accepting that they are treated like less," he says.
"Number one - wake up, take full ownership and responsibility of these young people. We now have a system that knows it's not working, and it's willing to chat with other people but not give any power to their words."
Social worker Paora Crawford Moyle, who appeared alongside Urlich on The Hui, says while it's easy to say children will go to "forever loving homes" or "loving environments", it's harder to make that a reality.
"We all want our children to be safe, but how you make that happen is really, really important. I have to remain optimistic because our children are at stake and survivors are at stake, and I wouldn't be doing what I do if I didn't have their best interests at heart," she says.
"That's another thing that's easy to throw out, 'we have children's best interests at heart'. The proof is in the pudding." Davis has tasked his independent ministerial advisory board with getting to the bottom of what has happened at the Christchurch facility.
"I think we can all agree over the past few years that it's obvious that Oranga Tamariki are failing to live up to their new name," Davis said on Wednesday.
"Today, I am not here to defend the indefensible. Oranga Tamariki has made some serious mistakes and there is no hiding away from them. Uplifts, social workers under pressure, a lack of training, and just recently, care and protection residences displaying unacceptable behaviour."
Davis said the "vast majority" of those working in residences are "doing a great job", but in an organisation of thousands, "there will always be someone, unfortunately, who does something they shouldn't".
"We want to eliminate that behaviour as we want to make sure all children are safe. We are not going to stand here... and defend the indefensible. It is about understanding what the problem is, the extent of the problem and then fixing it."
Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern watched CCTV footage showing the Oranga Tamariki staff tackling and head-locking a child in care and described the behaviour as "totally unacceptable".
"No question that from time to time there will be issues that escalate that staff have to deal with. Most social workers would have been appalled by what they saw on that video."
She said a child sustaining injuries from restraint in care wasn't acceptable.
"What we have seen, the video that has been produced in the last couple of days, clearly not meeting our expectations," Ardern said.
"We have asked Oranga Tamariki to look at the practices within those facilities. Our goal is not to have facilities like this. We are working towards group homes which we hope will be a better environment for these young people."
Sir Wira Gardiner, the agency's acting chief executive, told a parliamentary select committee on Wednesday that it is moving away from large facilities to smaller ones being built over the next three to four years. They want to replicate a homely environment and allow those in case to have one-on-one attention.
· Reply · 9 h
Lesley McLachlan
https://www.orangatamariki.govt.nz/.../Social-services... ... July 2020 This policy describes how Oranga Tamariki—Ministry for Children (Or… See more
· Reply · 9 h
Lesley McLachlan
Oranga Tamariki : Oranga Tamariki, also known as the Ministry for Children and previously the Ministry for Vulnerable Children, is a government department in New Zealand responsible for the well-being of children, specifically children at risk of harm,… See more
· Reply · 9 h
Lesley McLachlan
Child neglect : Child neglect is a form of abuse,[1] an egregious behavior of caregivers (e.g., parents) that results in a deprivation of child of their basic needs, including the failure to provide adequate supervision, health care, clothing, or housi… See more
· Reply · 5 h
Lesley McLachlan
Welfare: ... New Zealand:
Main article: Welfare in New Zealand
New Zealand is often regarded as having one of the first comprehensive welfare systems in the world. During the 1890s a Liberal government adopted many social programmes to help the poor who had suffered from a long economic depression in the 1880s. ... ; This liberal tradition flourished with increased enfranchisement for indigenous Maori in the 1880s and women. Pensions for the elderly, the poor and war casualties followed, with State-run schools, hospitals and subsidized medical and dental care. By 1960, New Zealand was able to afford one of the best-developed and most comprehensive welfare systems in the world, supported by a well-developed and stable economy; Welfare is a type of government support intended to ensure that members of a society can meet basic human needs such as food and shelter.[1] ... ; The International Labour Organization defines social security as covering support for those in old age, support for the maintenance of children, medical treatment, parental and sick leave, unemployment and disability benefits, and support for sufferers of occupational injury.[8][9]
More broadly, welfare may also encompass efforts to provide a basic level of well-being through free or subsidized social services such as healthcare, education, vocational training and public housing.[10][11] In a welfare state, the State assumes responsibility for the health, education, and welfare of society, providing a range of social services such as those described.[11]; ... In the early 20th century, the United Kingdom introduced social security around 1913, and adopted the welfare state with the National Insurance Act 1946, during the Attlee government (1945–51).[11] In the countries of western Europe, Scandinavia, and Australasia, social welfare is mainly provided by the government out of the national tax revenues, and to a lesser extent by non-government organizations (NGOs), and charities (social and religious).[11] A right to social security and an adequate standard of living is asserted in Articles 22 and 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. ... /// Welfare state: ... Modern forms:
Modern welfare programs are chiefly distinguished from earlier forms of poverty relief by their universal, comprehensive character. The institution of social insurance in Germany under Bismarck was an influential example. Some schemes were based largely in the development of autonomous, mutualist provision of benefits. Others were founded on state provision. In a highly influential essay, "Citizenship and Social Class" (1949), British sociologist Thomas Humphrey Marshall identified modern welfare states as a distinctive combination of democracy, welfare, and capitalism, arguing that citizenship must encompass access to social, as well as to political and civil rights. Examples of such states are Germany, all of the Nordic countries, the Netherlands, France, Uruguay and New Zealand and the United Kingdom in the 1930s. ... ; Political scientist Eileen McDonagh has argued that a major determinant of where welfare states arose is whether or not a country had a historical monarchy with familial foundations (a trait that Max Weber called patrimonialism); in places where the monarchic state was viewed as a parental steward of the populace, it was easier to shift into a mindset where the industrial state could also serve as a parental steward of the populace.[40]
The activities of present-day welfare states extend to the provision of both cash welfare benefits (such as old-age pensions or unemployment benefits) and in-kind welfare services (such as health or childcare services). Through these provisions, welfare states can affect the distribution of wellbeing and personal autonomy among their citizens, as well as influencing how their citizens consume and how they spend their time.[41][42] ...
· Reply · 5 h
Lesley McLachlan
Child abuse : Child abuse or child maltreatment is physical, sexual, and/or psychological maltreatment or neglect of a child or children, especially by a parent or a caregiver. Child abuse may include any act or failure to act by a parent or a caregiver that results in actual or potential harm to a child and can occur in a child's home, or in the organizations, schools, or communities the child interacts with.
The terms child abuse and child maltreatment are often used interchangeably, although some researchers make a distinction between them, treating child maltreatment as an umbrella term to cover neglect, exploitation, and trafficking.
Different jurisdictions have developed their own stance towards mandatory reporting, different definitions of what constitutes child abuse to remove children from their families or for prosecuting a criminal charge. ... /// Structural discrimination in New Zealand : Structural discrimination (also known as structural inequality, systemic discrimination, institutional racism, and white supremacy) occurs in a society "when an entire network of rules and practices disadvantages less empowered groups while serving at the same time to advantage the dominant group".[1] The Human Rights Commission in New Zealand have asserted that there is strong, consistent evidence that structural discrimination is a real and ongoing issue in the country. ... /// Social issue: A social issue is a problem that affects many people within a society. It is a group of common problems in present-day society and ones that many people strive to solve. It is often the consequence of factors extending beyond an individual's control. Social issues are the source of a conflicting opinions on the grounds of what are perceived as morally correct or incorrect personal life or interpersonal social life decisions. Social issues are distinguished from economic issues; however, some issues (such as immigration) have both social and economic aspects ...
· Reply · 5 h · Edited
Lesley McLachlan
Progress: ... As a goal, social progress has been advocated by varying realms of political ideologies with different theories on how it is to be achieved. ... ; Social progress: ... ; The social progress of a society can be measured based on factors such as its ability to address fundamental human needs, help citizens improve their quality of life, and provide opportunities for citizens to succeed.[11]
Social progress is often improved by increases in GDP, although other factors are also relevant. An imbalance between economic and social progress hinders further economic progress, and can lead to political instability.[11] Where there is an imbalance between economic growth and social progress, political instability and unrest often arise. Lagging social progress also holds back economic growth in these and other countries that fail to address human needs, build social capital, and create opportunity for their citizens. ... /// Child protection: Child protection is the safeguarding of children from violence, exploitation, abuse, and neglect. Article 19 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child provides for the protection of children in and out of the home. One of the ways to ensure this is by giving them quality education, the fourth of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, in addition to other child protection systems.
Child protection systems are a set of usually government-run services designed to protect children and young people who are underage and to encourage family stability. UNICEF defines[1] a ‘child protection system’ as:
the set of laws, policies, regulations and services needed across all social sectors – especially social welfare, education, health, security and justice – to support prevention and response to protection-related risks. These systems are part of social protection, and extend beyond it. At the level of prevention, their aim includes supporting and strengthening families to reduce social exclusion, and to lower the risk of separation, violence and exploitation. Responsibilities are often spread across government agencies, with services delivered by local authorities, non-State providers, and community groups, making coordination between sectors and levels, including routine referral systems etc.., a necessary component of effective child protection systems.
— United Nations Economic and Social Council (2008), UNICEF Child Protection Strategy, E/ICEF/2008/5/Rev.1, par. 12-13. ... ; Child protection assessment: ... A key part of child protection work is assessment.
A particular challenge arises where child protection professionals are assessing families where neglect is occurring. Professionals conducting assessments of families where neglect is taking place are said to sometimes make the following errors:[25]
Failure to ask the right types of question, including
Whether neglect is occurring?
Why neglect is occurring?
What the situation is like for the child?
Whether improvement in the family are likely to be sustained?
What needs to be done to ensure the long-term safety of the child? ... /// Social capital: Social capital is "the networks of relationships among people who live and work in a particular society, enabling that society to function effectively".[1] It involves the effective functioning of social groups through interpersonal relationships, a shared sense of identity, a shared understanding, shared norms, shared values, trust, cooperation, and reciprocity. Social capital is a measure of the value of resources, both tangible (e.g., public spaces, private property) and intangible (e.g., actors, human capital, people), and the impact that these relationships have on the resources involved in each relationship, and on larger groups. It is generally seen as a form of capital that produces public goods for a common purpose.
Social capital has been used to explain the improved performance of diverse groups, the growth of entrepreneurial firms, superior managerial performance, enhanced supply chain relations, the value derived from strategic alliances, and the evolution of communities.... ; Positive consequences of social capital:
Compared to Bourdieu, Robert D. Putnam has used the concept in a much more positive light: though he was at first careful to argue that social capital was a neutral term, stating "whether or not [the] shared are praiseworthy is, of course, entirely another matter,"[42] his work on American society tends to frame social capital as a producer of "civic engagement" and also a broad societal measure of communal health.[68] He also transforms social capital from a resource possessed by individuals to an attribute of collectives, focusing on norms and trust as producers of social capital to the exclusion of networks.
Mahyar Arefi (2003) identifies consensus-building as a direct positive indicator of social capital.[69] Consensus implies "shared interest" and agreement among various actors and stakeholders to induce collective action. Collective action is thus an indicator of increased social capital. ... /// Collective action: Collective action refers to action taken together by a group of people whose goal is to enhance their condition and achieve a common objective.[1] It is a term that has formulations and theories in many areas of the social sciences including psychology, sociology, anthropology, political science and economics. ...
· Reply · 4 h
Lesley McLachlan
Transition economy : A transition economy or transitional economy is an economy which is changing from a centrally planned economy to a market economy.[1] Transition economies undergo a set of structural transformations intended to develop market-based institutions. ... ; The promise of European Union membership and the adoption of the EU's legislation and regulations (the Community acquis or acquis communautaire) helped secure trust in property rights and economic and governmental institutions in much of Central and Eastern Europe.
Some economists have argued that the growth performance of the transition economies stemmed from the low level of development, decades of trade isolation and distortions in the socialist planned economies. They have emphasized that the transition strategies adopted reflected the need to resolve the economic crisis besetting the socialist planned economies and the overriding objective was the transformation to capitalist market economies rather than the fostering of economic growth and welfare.[19]
But by 2000, the EBRD was reporting that the effects of the initial starting point in each transition economy on the reform process had faded. Although the foundations had been laid for a functioning market economy through sustained liberalization, comprehensive privatization, openness to international trade and investment, and the establishment of democratic political systems there remained institutional challenges. Liberalized markets were not necessarily competitive and political freedom had not prevented powerful private interests from exercising undue influence.[20]
Ten years on, in the Transition Report for 2010, the EBRD was still finding that the quality of market-enabling institutions continued to fall short of what was necessary for well-functioning market economies. Growth in the transition economies had been driven by trade integration into the world economy with "impressive" export performance, and by "rapid capital inflows and a credit boom". But such growth had proved volatile and the EBRD considered that governments in the transition economies should foster the development of domestic capital markets and improve the business environment, including financial institutions, real estate markets and the energy, transport and communications infrastructure. The EBRD expressed concerns about regulatory independence and enforcement, price setting, and the market power of incumbent infrastructure operators.[21]
Income inequality as measured by the Gini coefficient rose significantly in the transition economies between 1987 and 1988 and the mid-1990s. Poverty re-emerged with between 20 and 50 percent of people living below the national poverty line in the transition economies. The UN Development Programme calculated that overall poverty in Eastern Europe and the CIS increased from 4 percent of the population in 1988 to 32 percent by 1994, or from 14 million people to 119 million.[22] Unemployment and rates of economic inactivity were still high in the late 1990s according to survey data.[23]
By 2007, the year before the global financial crisis hit, the index for GDP had reached 112 compared to 100 in 1989 for the transition economies. In other words, it took nearly 20 years to restore the level of output that had existed prior to the transition. The index of economic output (GDP) in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe was 151 in 2007; for the Balkans/ South-eastern Europe the index was 111, and for the Commonwealth of Independent States and Mongolia it was 102. Several CIS countries in the Caucasus and Central Asia as well as Moldova and Ukraine had economies that were substantially smaller than in 1989.[24]
The global recession of 2008-09 and the Eurozone crisis of 2011-13 destabilized the transition economies, reduced growth rates and increased unemployment. The slowdown hit government revenues and widened fiscal deficits but almost all transition economies had experienced a partial recovery and had maintained low and stable inflation since 2012.[25] ... ;
· Reply · 4 h
Lesley McLachlan
... According to the EBRD a well-functioning market economy should enjoy a diverse range of economic activities, equality of opportunity and convergence of incomes. These outcomes had not yet been achieved by 2013 and progress in establishing well-functioning market economies had stalled since the 1990s. On the EBRD's measure of transition indicators the transition economies had become "stuck in transition". Price liberalization, small-scale privatization and the opening-up of trade and foreign exchange markets were mostly complete by the end of the 1990s. However economic reform had slowed in areas such governance, enterprise restructuring and competition policy, which remained substantially below the standard of other developed market economies.[30]
Inequality of opportunity was higher in the transition economies of Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia than in some other developed economies in Western Europe (except France, where inequality of opportunity was relatively high). The highest inequality of opportunity was found in the Balkans and Central Asia. In terms of legal regulations and access to education and health services, inequality of opportunity related to gender was low in Europe and Central Asia but medium to high in respect of labour practices, employment and entrepreneurship and in access to finance. In Central Asia women also experienced significant lack of access to health services, as was the case in Arab countries.[31] While many transition economies performed well with respect to primary and secondary education, and matched that available in many other developed economies, they were weaker when it came to training and tertiary education.[32]
Over the decade 1994 to 2004, the transition economies had closed some of the gap in income per person with the average for the European Union in purchasing power parity terms. These gains had been driven by sustained growth in productivity as obsolete capital stock was scrapped and production shifted to take advantage of the opening-up of foreign trade, price liberalization and foreign direct investment. However the rapid growth rates of that period of catch-up had stalled since the late 2000s and the prospects for income convergence have receded according to the EBRD's prognosis, unless there are additional productivity-enhancing structural reforms.[33]
The recent history of transition suggested that weak political institutions and entrenched interest groups had hindered economic reform. The EBRD's Transition Report 2013 looked at the relationship between transition and democratization. The report acknowledged that the academic literature was divided on whether economic development fostered democracy but argued that there was nonetheless strong empirical support for the hypothesis. It suggested that countries with high inequality were less inclined to support a limited and accountable state. In general, the proportion of the population with an income of between US$10–50 a day (the so-called "middle class") correlated with the level of democracy; however this correlation disappeared in transition countries with high income inequality. Those countries with large natural resource endowments, for example oil and gas producers like Russia and Kazakhstan, had less accountable governments and faced less electoral pressure to tackle powerful vested interests because the government could rely on resource rents and did not have to tax the population heavily. Countries with a strong institutional environment – that is, effective rule of law, secure property rights and uncorrupted public administration and corporate governance – were better placed to attract investment and undertake restructuring and regulatory change.[34]
To spur further economic reform and break out of a vicious circle, the EBRD Transition Report 2013 proposed that the transition economies should:
Open up trade and finance, which made reform more resilient to popular pressure ("market aversion") and meant that countries could access the EU single market either as member states or through association agreements (such as those being negotiated with Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia);
Encourage transparent and accountable government, with media and civil society scrutiny, and political competition at elections;
Invest in human capital, especially by improving the quality of tertiary education.[35]
Countries in transition
Although the term "transition economies" usually covers the countries of Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, this term may have a wider context. Outside of Europe, there are countries emerging from a socialist-type command economy towards a market-based economy (e.g., China). Despite such movements, some countries have chosen to remain non-free states with regard to political freedoms and human rights.
In a wider sense, the definition of transition economy refers to all countries which attempt to change their basic constitutional elements towards market-style fundamentals. Their origin could be also in a post-colonial situation, in a heavily regulated Asian-style economy, in a Latin American post-dictatorship, or even in a somehow economically underdeveloped country in Africa.[3] ...
· Reply · 4 h
Lesley McLachlan
Rural development: Rural Development is the process of improving the quality of life and economic well-being of people living in rural areas, often relatively isolated and sparsely populated areas. ... ; Rural development is also characterized by its emphasis on locally produced economic development strategies.[4] In contrast to urban regions, which have many similarities, rural areas are highly distinctive from one another. For this reason there are a large variety of rural development approaches used globally.[5]
Rural development is a comprehensive term. It essentially focuses on action for the development of areas outside the mainstream urban economic system. ... ; Approaches to development
Rural development actions are intended to further the social and economic development of rural communities.[6][7]
Rural development programs were historically top-down approaches from local or regional authorities, regional development agencies, NGOs, national governments or international development organizations.[8] However, a critical 'organization gap' identified during the late 1960s, reflecting on the disjunction between national organizations and rural communities led to a great focus on community participation in rural development agendas.[8] Oftentimes this was achieved through political decentralization policies in developing countries, particularly popular among African countries, or policies that shift the power of socio-politico-economic decision-making and the election of representatives and leadership from centralized governments to local governments.[9] As a result, local populations can also bring about endogenous initiatives for development. The term rural development is not limited to issues of developing countries. In fact many developed countries have very active rural development programs.[citation needed]
Rural development aims at finding ways to improve rural lives with participation of rural people themselves, so as to meet the required needs of rural communities.[10] The outsider may not understand the setting, culture, language and other things prevalent in the local area. As such, rural people themselves have to participate in their sustainable rural development. In developing countries like Nepal, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh and China, integrated development approaches are being followed up.[11] In this context, many approaches and ideas have been developed and implemented, ...
· Reply · 3 h
Lesley McLachlan
Gunnar Myrdal: Karl Gunnar Myrdal (/ˈmɜːrdɑːl, ˈmɪər-/ MUR-dahl, MEER-; Swedish: [ˈɡɵ̌nːar ˈmy̌ːɖɑːl]; 6 December 1898 – 17 May 1987) was a Swedish economist and sociologist. In 1974, he received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences with Friedrich Hayek for "their pioneering work in the theory of money and economic fluctuations and for their penetrating analysis of the interdependence of economic, social and institutional phenomena." ... ; World War II and after
During World War II, Gunnar Myrdal was staunchly and publicly anti-Nazi. Together with his wife, Alva, he wrote Contact with America in 1941, which praised the United States' democratic institutions.[12]
Gunnar Myrdal became the Executive Secretary of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe in 1947. During his tenure, he founded one of the leading centers of economic research and policy development.[13] After ten years in the position, Dr. Myrdal resigned as Executive Secretary in 1957. In 1956 and 1957, he was able to publish An International Economy, Problems and Prospects, Rich Lands and Poor and Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions. Myrdal was also a signatory of the 1950 UNESCO statement The Race Question, which rebuts the theories of racial supremacy and purity, and also influenced the Brown v. Board of Education decision. In 1956, Myrdal wrote the foreword for African American author Richard Wright's The Color Curtain: A Report on the Bandung Conference.
Between 1960 and 1967, he was a professor of international economics at Stockholm University. In 1961, he founded the Institute for International Economic Studies at the University. Throughout the 1960s, he worked on a comprehensive study of trends and policies in South Asia for the Twentieth Century Fund. The study culminated in his three-volume Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations, published in 1968. In 1970, he published a companion book called The Challenge of World Poverty, where he laid out what he believed to be the chief policy solutions to the problems he outlined in Asian Drama.
Gunnar Myrdal strongly opposed the Vietnam War. In Asian Drama, Myrdal predicted that land reform and pacification would fail in Vietnam and urged the United States to begin negotiations with North Vietnam. After returning to Sweden, he headed the Swedish Vietnam Committee and became co-chair of International Commission of Inquiry Into U.S. War Crimes in Indochina. He also presided over the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, an international watch-dog for the arms trade.[14] He was one of the signers of the Humanist Manifesto.[15]: ...
· Reply · 4 h
Lesley McLachlan
Gunnar Myrdal and "Asian Drama" in context
Ravi Kanbur 09 March 2018
Gunnar Myrdal’s “Asian Drama” was published 50 years ago. On the face of it, the book, framed in terms of the realities of an economically stagnant Asia, appears to have little to offer the modern development economist. This column argues, however, that the issues Myrdal raised are fundamental ones not only for development but for our discipline of economics and for the broader terrain of political economy.... ; Myrdal’s magnum opus
Gunnar Myrdal began work on Asian Drama in 1957, more than ten years before its publication. The world view of the time is well captured by something he wrote in 1957:
“…there is a small group of countries which are quite well off and a much larger group of extremely poor countries; that the countries in the former group are on the whole firmly settled in a pattern of continuing economic development, while in the latter group progress is slower, as many countries are in constant danger of not being able to lift themselves out of stagnation or even of losing ground so far as average income levels are concerned; and that, therefore, on the whole, in recent decades the economic inequalities between developed and developing countries have been increasing.”
It is this framing of more than half a century ago which is most at odds with the reality of Asian development in the last quarter century, with the explosive growth of China, India, Vietnam, and a host of other countries. Although Asian Drama was focused primarily on South Asia, in the book China and other Asian countries were often painted with the same brush.3 Along with most others at the time, Myrdal did not foresee that the economies of India and China would come to rival the size of the US economy in little more than half a century.
Relevance to 21st century development discourse
However, strong traces of Asian Drama, and of the Myrdal before and after Asian Drama, are to be found in in the 21st century development discourse. This is because the issues Myrdal raised, throughout his life but also in Asian Drama, are fundamental ones not only for development but for our discipline of economics and for the broader terrain of political economy. Here are three such themes.
The first of these is the role of values in analysis. Myrdal argued, and on this he never wavered after first staking out his claim in the 1930s, that economics is by necessity value laden.4 He argued that although there had been vigorous debate on this in the nineteenth century, the economics of his time had tried to present itself as value free, in an attempt to achieve a status comparable to that of natural science. But this was manifestly not the case, and could not be the case given the nature of the subject. Rather than pretend otherwise, he proposed, and carried out his own proposal very thoroughly in Asian Drama, that the values should be made explicit. I think this is a major strand of his thinking and we would do well to take it to heart.
The second theme which emerges from a study of Asian Drama in the overall context of Gunnar Myrdal’s life work is that of the necessity of going beyond narrow economic principles to understand society, and even to understand the economy itself. Throughout his work, Myrdal maintained a healthy respect for the core tenets of economics as a discipline – indeed, some of the reviews of Asian Drama noted this well.5 But his main thrust is the need to understand fully the social, cultural and political context when trying to explain economic facts and when developing economic policy prescriptions. This comes through most strongly in his discussions of the roles of the ruling elite, and of the gap between formulation and implementation of policy in what he called the “soft sate.”
But ruling elites, corruption, and soft states bring to the fore what I consider to be the third lasting theme in Asian Drama and in Myrdal’s life work. This is the constant struggle to find the balance between state and market. The struggle was famously characterised by Edmund Burke (1795) as being "… what the state ought to take upon itself to direct by the public wisdom, and what it ought to leave, with as little interference as possible, to individual discretion".
I have argued in Kanbur (2016) that this is in effect the eternal question of political economy. Keynes (1926) alluded to this in his equally famous critique of the laissez-faire doctrine.6 The see-saw between an interventionist stance in the face of manifest market failure and a pull-back upon realisation of state failure, and where the balance is struck, is seen in Gunnar Myrdal’s specific struggles with himself and his cycles of thinking on foreign aid, and on the constant back and forth between wanting planning as a way out of an underdevelopment trap, and planning itself as a trap giving hostages to the elites and to the soft state.
The development vista has changed dramatically over the last half century. But the fundamental tensions, including the three themes discussed here, are still with us. They are to be found in some form in most, if not all, of the ‘big picture’ and ‘grand sweep’ books of the last decade, albeit now with the context of the changes of the last 50 years. Myrdal’s struggles with these tensions are his ultimate legacy to the development discourse of the 21st century. ...
· Reply · 4 h
Lesley McLachlan
Children's ombudsman : A children's ombudsman, children's commissioner, youth commissioner, child advocate, children's commission, youth ombudsman or equivalent body is a public authority in various countries charged with the protection and promotion of the rights of children and young people, either in society at large, or in specific categories such as children in contact with the care system. The agencies usually have a substantial degree of independence from the executive, and generally operate as specialised ombudsman offices or national human rights institutions, dealing with individual complaints, intervening with other public authorities, conducting research, and – where their mandate permits them to engage in advocacy – generally promoting children's rights in public policy, law and practice. The first children's commissioner was established in Norway in 1981. The creation of such institutions has been promoted by the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, and, from 1990 onwards, by the Council of Europe.[1][2]; Bangladesh:
Although no office has yet been established, the social scientist Kamal Uddin Siddiqui, a former member of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, has since March 2004 promoted the establishment of an Independent Children's Commissioner for Bangladesh. He led a Government delegation to France, Norway and Sweden in February 2004 to study the Children's Ombudsman institutions in those countries. ... ; New Zealand:
Main article: Children's Commissioner Act 2003
The Office of the Children's Commissioner (Māori: Manaakitia A Tatou Tamariki) was founded under the Children, Young Persons, and Their Families Act 1989, and the Children's Commissioner Act 2003 reformed the institution while bringing into domestic law the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. The Commissioner promotes awareness and understanding of the views and interests of children, conducts research and inquiries, and can investigate individual cases. A Young People’s Reference Group (YPRG), comprising young people between 12 and 18, assists the Commissioner and other government agencies in strategic planning and consultation with children and youth.[7] The Children's Commissioner is usually a senior paediatrician or academic. The current Commissioner is Judge Andrew Becroft. ... /// Ministry for Women: ... Areas of focus
The Ministry's policy work is focused on three priority areas:[7]
increasing the economic independence of women
increasing the number of women in leadership
increased the safety of women from violence.
These three priorities feed into the Government's objectives of lifting New Zealand's economic performance and building a safer New Zealand. ... /// Women's rights: ... Issues commonly associated with notions of women's rights include the right to bodily integrity and autonomy, to be free from sexual violence, to vote, to hold public office, to enter into legal contracts, to have equal rights in family law, to work, to fair wages or equal pay, to have reproductive rights, to own property, and to education. ... /// Mother: ... The social roles associated with motherhood are variable across time, culture, and social class. ... /// Family: ... The purpose of families is to maintain the well-being of its members and of society. Ideally, families would offer predictability, structure, and safety as members mature and participate in the community.[1] In most societies, it is within families that children acquire socialization for life outside the family, and acts as the primary source of attachment, nurturing, and socialization for humans.[2][3] Additionally, as the basic unit for meeting the basic needs of its members, it provides a sense of boundaries for performing tasks in a safe environment, ideally builds a person into a functional adult, transmits culture, and ensures continuity of humankind with precedents of knowledge.
Anthropologists generally classify most family organizations as matrifocal (a mother and her children); patrifocal (a father and his children); conjugal (a wife, her husband, and children, also called the nuclear family); avuncular (for example, a grandparent, a brother, his sister, and her children); or extended (parents and children co-reside with other members of one parent's family). ...
· Reply · 4 h · Edited
Lesley McLachlan
JULY 9, 2021: ‘I don’t have that lived experience’ - Luxon’s difficulty with new role
National MP Chris Luxon is touted as a future leader and is registering in recent polls. He spoke to political editor Jo Moir about his current challenge in iwi development, and why he hasn't fronted on He Puapua. ... ; Local government and iwi development are two significant areas undergoing reform and debate in Parliament, and Luxon is spokesperson for the Opposition for both.
He also has associate transport which has seen the MP for Botany take on Minister Michael Wood over the Harbour Bridge cycleway, which makes sense when National’s transport spokesperson is from the deep south.
But in the eight months Luxon has held those portfolios he’s only been visible in two.
Newsroom has requested an interview with him six times on his iwi development portfolio and all have been declined.
Colleagues of Luxon's spoken to by Newsroom offered a reason for that, saying it's possible he didn't want to have to toe the party line on race relations and be forever branded by it.
This week Newsroom again contacted Luxon to say a story was due, which prompted him to give a sit-down interview on Thursday afternoon. ... ; He Puapua and the UN Declaration
Luxon says meeting the obligations of the UN Declaration is a “serious constitutional conversation’’.
“It’s a worthy one to have and we should have it, but we need to make sure all New Zealanders can participate.’
“We shouldn’t walk back from UNDRIP at all - we committed to it in 2010 but the Declaration is non-binding, and it’s implemented very differently by signatories all around the world.’’
New Zealand signed up to the Declaration under the then-National government and now Māori Development Minister Willie Jackson is progressing the work on the back of an independent report, He Puapua.
From the outset it's been made clear He Puapua isn’t government policy, rather a think piece to get a national conversation started.
“On He Puapua the Government is saying that’s the natural extension from UNDRIP, we’re saying it doesn’t have to be." - Chris Luxon
Māori will be consulted with first on what co-governance should look like in the future and then all of New Zealand will have their say next year.
Luxon said the Declaration can be achieved through a range of activities and the scope goes from self-determination through to language and culture and a raft of other measures.
“He Puapua seems to be the natural outflow of all of that, when there’s quite a lot of discretion for how a government might choose to implement or action it within their own country and laws.’
“On He Puapua the Government is saying that’s the natural extension from UNDRIP, we’re saying it doesn’t have to be.
“There were some radical solutions in He Puapua about 50/50 co-governance, separate courts and Parliament.’’
· Reply · 3 h
Lesley McLachlan
He says the Government commissioned He Puapua and now there’s an “ethos around it they feel attached to’’.
Luxon pointed to Te Paati Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi being on record saying democracy as it is doesn’t work for Māori.
While he caveated the fact Waititi is not a member of the Government, Luxon said “there will be sympathy for some of that from government ministers’’.
So what would National do differently?
“What we would fundamentally do is have very targeted practical choice-based programmes to actually deal with the inequities we’ve got. I’m a big fan of Bill English and what he was talking about in social investment, that’s the kind of model of stuff we need to do,'' Luxon told Newsroom.
“We aren’t a big party that does lofty ideology - we’re a party that does practical, pragmatic, solving solutions, getting stuff done.’’
Asked whether the proposed Māori Health Authority, which National opposes, is exactly that, Luxon argued it isn't because it creates two systems.
Some would argue Whānau Ora creates two systems as well - a policy driven and celebrated by National.
Luxon says Whānau Ora is different because it’s “available to everyone to participate in, and it’s a choice-based system and more targeted from the bottom-up’’.
Newsroom countered that if Whānau Ora clinics were really "available to everyone" did he think they were being flooded by Pākehā.
Luxon responded, “No, no, no - I take your point’’ and then moved to charter schools as a better example.
He described this policy, which actually derives from the ACT Party but was implemented by the National government, as being a “targeted and powerful intervention’’.
Charter schools are also built on co-governance and when that was put to Luxon he said the difference was that the Labour-majority government is pushing for everything to be 50/50.
Asked when the Government had indicated it was pushing for everything to be 50/50 with Māori, Luxon replied “that’s how it’s been represented by He Puapua’’.
Luxon accepts He Puapua is an independent report, but defended his argument saying “that the language people have been using when they say co-governance - it’s 50/50 - and that’s not what I understand co-governance to be’’.
Co-governance isn’t new - in fact under the last National government, Treaty Negotiations Minister Chris Finlayson progressed a lot of work in this area, including Te Urewera and Whanganui River settlements.
Luxon says that work was “outstanding’’ but described them as “bespoke bits’’ carried out by Finlayson and not in the realm of a “constitutional system change where it’s 50/50’’.
In the case of Te Urewera it is a full-blown co-management model with Tuhoe.
Luxon described it as a “practical pragmatic solution versus a system-wide everything is 50/50, and we’ll have two parliaments, thank you very much’’.
A separate Māori Parliament has already been ruled out by the Prime Minister.
Where to from here?
Luxon says New Zealand needs to keep working on unconscious bias and “our understanding of racism in this country’’.
While he doesn’t accept the argument from some that police and other state systems like corrections are “racist’’, he says there’s plenty more work to be done by both Pākehā and Māori.
“I do think it’s good as a leader of a large organisation that you make sure people are working through any unconscious bias they might have - that’s a good thing.’’
Luxon has a performance review of sorts coming up in September when Collins sits down with all her MPs to assess what they’ve done in their portfolios before making any changes.
In his first sit-down with Collins following last year’s devastating election result, Luxon said he told her he wanted to focus on “getting out and about and building relationships’’.
“Then we’ll earn the right to be able to have a different conversation around where we think those policy conversations are going.’’ (Newsroom)
· Reply · 3 h · Edited
Lesley McLachlan
Social finance: Social finance is a category of financial services which aims to leverage private capital to address challenges in areas of social and environmental need.[1] Having gained popularity in the aftermath of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, it is notable for its public benefit focus.[2][3][4] Mechanisms of creating shared social value are not new, however, social finance is conceptually unique as an approach to solving social problems while simultaneously creating economic value.[5][6] Unlike philanthropy, which has a similar mission-motive, social finance secures its own sustainability by being profitable for investors.[7] Capital providers lend to social enterprises who in turn, by investing borrowed funds in socially beneficial initiatives, deliver investors measurable social returns in addition to traditional financial returns on their investment. ... ; Consensus has yet to be established on a formal definition of social finance due to lacking clarity around its scope and intent,[9] however, it is said to include elements of impact investing, socially responsible investing and social enterprise lending.[10] Investors include charitable foundation, retail investors and institutional investors.[11] Notable examples of social finance instruments are Social Impact Bonds and Social Impact Funds.[9] ... /// Social return on investment: Social return on investment (SROI) is a principles-based method for measuring extra-financial value (such as environmental or social value not currently reflected or involved in conventional financial accounts). It can be used by any entity to evaluate impact on stakeholders, identify ways to improve performance, and enhance the performance of investments. ...
· Reply · 3 h
Lesley McLachlan
Fatema Ferdousi Selwyn Vercoe thank you for interest. Margaret Mcarthur works in the Ministry for Women. /// Māori people: The Māori ... are the indigenous Polynesian people of mainland New Zealand. ... ; Society : ... 20th century to present: ... While the arrival of Europeans had a profound impact on the Māori way of life, many aspects of traditional society have survived into the 21st century. Māori participate fully in all spheres of New Zealand culture and society, leading largely Western lifestyles while also maintaining their own cultural and social customs. ... ; Traditional kinship ties are also actively maintained, and the whānau in particular remains an integral part of Māori life. ... /// Whānau : Whānau (Māori pronunciation: [ˈfaːnaʉ]) is a Māori-language word for extended family. ... ; Whakapapa is Māori genealogy. First on the whakapapa comes the waka, the canoe on which the people first arrived in New Zealand. Second is the iwi (tribe), then the hapū (subtribe) and then whānau. ... Valmai Horlor Jonathan Barb Murray Pearce ... Iwi : ... ; Iwi identity: Increasing urbanisation of Māori has led to a situation where a significant percentage do not identify with any particular iwi. ... Sejin Pak ...
· Reply · 3 h · Edited
Lesley McLachlan
Pākehā invading the Māori mind: The strange case of Roderick Finlayson We continue our week-long examination of New Zealand writer Roderick Finlayson with an essay by Anahera Gildea on cultural appropriation ... Anahera Gildea (Ngāti Tukorehe) is a Wellington-based essayist, poet and short story writer. Her first book of poetry was published in 2016; The Ngawhika family (in Pukehina, c.1927), were the model for many of Roderick Finlayson's short stories. ... ; "There can be little dispute...that [Finlayson's] stories are vivid and compassionate attempts to portray the early twentieth-century effects of Māori deracination and broken communal integrity." ... ; The 1970s were a crucial time in the recent history of Aotearoa. Writers like JC Sturm, Patricia Grace, and Witi Ihimaera emerged into the literary world; Pope John Paul II insisted that the rosary be the preferred meditative practice for Catholics worldwide; ngā iwi Māori rose up politically in the Land March, at the occupation of Bastion Point and the Raglan golf course, in the establishment of the Waitangi Tribunal; and so much more. It was also the decade in which I was born and baptised, and that saw the first revival and republication of Finlayson’s work. ... (newsroom) /// Finlayson, Roderick David 1904–1992 ... ; Farm life introduced Finlayson to rural Maori. He stayed with the family of Hone Ngawhika at Pukehina for several summers during the 1920s until about 1931, learning from him traditional ways of living with the land. ... ; Finlayson showed Cresswell his satiric writing, but Cresswell was more impressed by some short stories, modelled on those of the Sicilian writer, Giovanni Verga. These were written about the Pukehina community from which Finlayson now felt himself to be in exile, possibly as the result of a failed love affair. ... ; He won third prize in the short story section of the centennial literary competitions with 'The totara tree'. Cresswell wrote to him in the early 1940s, 'Men like you & Sargeson are founding our native style, if we are to have any.' Although eclipsed by Sargeson, Finlayson participated in the emergence of a regional literature that seemed to be revealing the country to itself, critically, for the first time. He shared the romanticism of many of his contemporaries, celebrating what he called the poetic life, 'a life dependent on the forces and powers of Nature', and lamented its loss in the kainga (village), on the farm, within the human heart. ... ; Roderick Finlayson's distinctive contribution to the writing of New Zealand was the Maori stories of his first two collections. They portrayed a people caught between two worlds, as the urban economy insinuated its influence into traditional communities, bringing Pakeha bent on their dispossession. Although his rendering of Maori thought and speech has sometimes been criticised as simplistic, Finlayson's sympathetic yet unsentimental stories make him an important transitional figure between the colonial apologia of precursors such as A. A. Grace and the Maori writers who have succeeded him.
From 1952 to 1960 Finlayson wrote almost entirely for children; he was commissioned by the School Publications Branch of the Department of Education to produce stories on Maori life and history, and on his own childhood. The Maori historical fiction was republished as The springing fern in 1965; he also wrote The Maoris of New Zealand in 1958. The work introduced Finlayson to James K. Baxter, his sometime editor; ... (teara biographies) ... /// Cultural appropriation: Cultural appropriation[1][2] is the adoption of an element or elements of one culture or identity by members of another culture or identity. This can be controversial when members of a dominant culture appropriate from minority cultures.[3][1][4]
According to critics of the practice, cultural appropriation differs from acculturation, assimilation, or equal cultural exchange in that this appropriation is a form of colonialism. ... /// Decolonization : Indigenous decolonization theory: Indigenous decolonization theory views Western Eurocentric historical accounts and political discourse as an ongoing political construct that attempts to negate Indigenous peoples and their experiences around the world. Indigenous people of the world precede and negate all Eurocentric colonization projects ... ; In this view, the independence of former Western-European colonies, such as the United States, Australia, and Brazil, is conceptualized as part of a neo-colonization project and not as decolonization. The creation of these states merely continued ongoing European colonialism. Any former European colony not free of Western European influence, such as South Africa, Australia, Mexico, Brazil, etc. fit such a conceptualization. ... /// Pukehina : Pukehina is a beach and township located in the Western Bay of Plenty District and Bay of Plenty Region of New Zealand's North Island. It consists of a white sandy beach, an estuary, farms and several homes. ...
· Reply · 2 h · Edited
Lesley McLachlan
... Like Sargeson again, he owed a profound debt to a favourite uncle. Arthur Wilson, who would become the model for Uncle Ted in the episodic novel Tidal Creek (1948), worked during Finlayson’s childhood years as a farm manager in the Bay of Plenty. It was during his summers with Arthur that he got to know the Māori dairying families of Pukehina, and in particular the Ngawhika whānau who more or less adopted him. From his early teens till his late twenties Pukehina was his elective home. It was here, he would say, that he felt most himself: "Dear old Honi Ngawhika one night said to me, 'Roddy, I don’t know how it is, but I know you are not a Pākehā, Roddy. You are a Māori.'" And it was the dairy farms and flax-cutting camps of the eastern Bay of Plenty, and the families who lived there, that he would celebrate in his best work.
However, Finlayson’s Māori fictions are by no means a transparent reflection of the Pukehina he knew. The picture is affected by his language and genre choices, and shaped by personal factors that are felt rather than named. Around 1931, as he explains in an autobiographical essay, "events led to a separation from my Māori family, their hapū, and the place I began to call my homeland and for which, on parting, I composed a lament in the old Māori manner. That wild coast of sand and swamp, faraway and lonely, I have not seen again. In front of me now is a faded snapshot of a group of young men, seven of them, my friends, brothers in many adventures. Before I could revisit their kāinga all were dead or scattered. They died in ways common to young Māori of those days – of disease, of suicide or other violence, of mākutu, of insanity. One ended his days in jail, another eloped away down south. And I did not go back."
In his fiction he finds an "outlet" for what he calls "that aroha whakamuri, that passionate recalling of times past". In its own way the project is reminiscent of Mansfield’s, rebuilding an idealised world around her dead brother. In his "exile", as Finlayson puts, his stories "let [him] live with [his] friends again, and this time give permanence to their short lives".
But Mansfield, though he read her, would not be Finlayson’s model. Instead, after various false starts writing satire and "didactic stuff", the breakthrough came with the chance discovery of the Sicilian Giovanni Verga: "The lives of those Sicilian peasants were very like the lives of the backcountry Māori people as I knew them then – the same poverty, hardship and ill-health, the same up-flaring of passions and sudden violence, the feuds and the festivals." A short while later he discovered the more humorous stories of Luigi Pirandello, and on the model of the two Sicilians, with perhaps a lingering dash of Maupassant, he fashioned his strange and distinctive menu of comedy, melodrama and ironic, often violent, misfortune. ... ; Pākehā bloody Māori-lover: The strange case of Roderick Finlayson
We conclude our week-long examination of New Zealand writer Roderick Finlayson with a review of his stories by John Newton
Roger Hickin’s Cold Hub Press is one of the small miracles of contemporary New Zealand publishing. Over the last decade, on what can only be a shoe-string budget, the Lyttelton-based press has produced a steady stream of good quality verse. The Cold Hub catalogue has come to be known, not just for its strong South Island flavour, but for ground-breaking translations – particularly those by Hickin himself of lesser-known poets from South and Central America. Added to this, more recently, have been previously unpublished or neglected texts by mid-20th century New Zealand writers: Dan Davin’s memoir of Paddy Costello, uncollected poems by R.A.K. Mason, the poems of Ruth France, and now A Roderick Finlayson Reader. I’m guessing these are not money-spinners. They’re a labour of love, and anyone who cares about the backstory of New Zealand writing should be warmly appreciative.
Roderick Finlayson, born in 1904 to a Scottish father and an Irish (Unionist) mother, was the exact contemporary of Sargeson, Mason, Fairburn and Hyde. ... (newsroom)
· Reply · 2 h
Lesley McLachlan
Like Sargeson’s, his earliest stories were published in the 1930s in the left-wing journal Tomorrow. Brown Man’s Burden appeared in 1938, and his second collection, Sweet Beulah Land, in 1942. Other work would follow at somewhat irregular intervals: a couple of novels, some later stories, a study of D’Arcy Cresswell, and various polemical writings of which the most trenchant are about the evils of mechanised agriculture. It’s the stories, however, that are Finlayson’s claim to posterity. Brief, ostensibly simple, and reticent, they are Sargeson-like except in one key aspect: that where Sargeson explored the world of fringe-dwelling Pākehā men, Finlayson wrote about rural Māori. In this respect he was out on his own. Among a nationalist generation who (with the exception of Robin Hyde) were writing Māori out of the picture, Finlayson alone could see that the Māori world of the 1920s – for all its material poverty – had a vibrancy that Pākehā might envy. This, I would like to think, is what Sargeson had in mind when he speculated that Finlayson’s work might outlast his own. ... ; in transcribing their broken speech – at the height of the active suppression of te reo Māori – he was recording neither more nor less than the damage wrought by colonisation. But that doesn’t put the problem to bed. In giving voice to somebody else’s inarticulacy it is fiendishly difficult not to objectify them. On top of which Finlayson is not really language-minded; he’s a ‘content’ writer, always keen get the story told. Indeed, perhaps it was only a certain degree of innocence that allowed him to carry on in that prohibitively difficult territory he felt most drawn to. This is not say, however, that he failed to recognise the vulnerability of his own position. We never learn more about the unspecified "events" that led to his "exile" from Pukehina. We can infer, however, what it felt like to lose that footing in a Māori community. Among his best stories is the later piece, "Great Times Ahead" (1973). The elderly narrator is the son of a Pākehā store-keeper and a "half-caste Maori" mother. He’s Māori, in other words, yet conscious of a kind of Pākehā difference: "Perhaps it’s just because I take after Dad that I don’t look much of a Maori now . . ." But he has lived his whole life in a Māori environment, and owns, through his mother, a fragment of Māori land. It’s the forced sale of this that takes him on a rare visit to Auckland; there he finds himself in a pub:
I ordered a beer, and on my right was this young Māori in a T-shirt and jeans ... "Tēnā koe!" I said to be friendly, and particularly as I saw him like one of my own people uprooted from some country settlement like my own ... It was quite a shock when he took me up wrong.
"You the sort of Pākehā that learns Māori lessons, eh, so you can teach us Maoris," he said, in an accusing way.
But then I could see that he’d had a bit too much to drink ... And when he turned away from me he had that lonely look I’d seen before. I guessed that he was one of the new city generation who wouldn’t be able to speak a word of Māori. He took me for a Pākehā, so I tried to pass it over by merely saying, "Oh no, but down the coast where I live we still use the old greetings."
"So you’re a big bloody landowner down the coast."
I couldn’t help laughing as I thought of the way I’d just been stripped of my last share of any sort of land. I peeled off one of the fivers that represented my remaining worldly wealth from that source and told the boy to come on, drink up and have another with me.
"Yeah, big Pākehā bloody Māori-lover," he said.
If it’s easy to spot the narrator as a stand-in for the author, it’s also easy to feel his hurt. Here the speech really does ring true. Finlayson, we can safely conclude, was aware of the lesson that a number of Pākehā ‘Māori-lovers’ were to learn in the 1970s and 80s (Michael King being perhaps the most notable): that the respect of an elder generation of Māori was no guarantee of being accepted by a younger one.
We Pākehā, of course, keen to signal our good faith, are given to policing these cross-cultural boundaries if anything more keenly – more anxiously – than Māori. And the codes we enforce are in constant evolution. In his essay Beginnings, published in 1966, Finlayson wrote: "I, a Pakeha, can be Maori when I wish – or perhaps I am mostly Maori and can play Pakeha only when I try hard." This may have washed in the 1920s, or even still in the late 1960s. Finlayson at the time was becoming a kind of tūakana to James K. Baxter, who was hatching his plans for Jerusalem where in due course he would express-make more subtle versions of the same conviction. Plainly, however, it doesn’t work now. We live in moment particular about identity, and hostile to cross-cultural ventriloquism. It's almost certainly not the time for a writer like Finlayson to find new readers among younger generations.
But Finlayson shouldn’t be dismissed. One reader who had trouble making up his mind about the Pukehina fictions was Bill Pearson. In an essay of 1958 he was quite severe. Fifteen years later, though, he walked back his criticism. We need to be wary, he wrote, of the "confidence" of our critical conceptions, which "might prove an obstacle to the humility with which one should read these stories". The simplicity of Finlayson’s work can be deceptive. The best of his fictions are side-long creations that don’t yield all their secrets at once. They deserve to read patiently, and above all, as Pearson advised, humbly.
Finlayson’s title Brown Man’s Burden plays on a notorious paean to Empire by Rudyard Kipling. Kipling's The White Man’s Burden is the moral responsibility to share – through colonisation! – the ‘gifts’ of western civilisation. The author of Brown Man’s Burden insisted on the opposite: that in terms of how to live in this colonised whenua, Māori had more to teach Pākehā than the other way round. For those of us who feel the attraction of this argument, Finlayson remains a valuable ancestor. Reading him now I am still grateful to him, as I am to Cold Hub Press for keeping his work in front of us. ... ; John Newton
John Newton's recent books are Escape Path Lighting (Victoria UP, 2020) and Llew Summers: Body and Soul (Canterbury UP, 2020). He was the 2020 Burns Fellow.
· Reply · 2 h · Edited
No comments:
Post a Comment