Friday, July 30, 2021

아동 체벌에 관대한 호주 여론, 왜? 이금종

EBS 뉴스

아동 체벌에 관대한 호주 여론, 왜?
이금종 | 2021. 05. 31 | 343 조회
법으로 '합리적 체벌' 인정하는 호주

체벌 찬성 여론도 반대보다 우세

체벌 인식 재고 필요


아동권 보호에 엄격하다고 알려진 호주. 하지만 여전히 '합리적(reasonable)' 체벌을 합법의 영역에 두고 있다.


호주 여론도 체벌에 관대한 편으로 보인다. 2019년 호주 전역에서 실시한 여론조사에 따르면 체벌 찬성은 47%, 반대는 38%에 그쳤다. 연령이 높아질수록 찬성 비율도 높았는데, 이는 유년기에 겪은 체벌 경험이 본인에게 유해하지 않았다는 믿음 때문인 것으로 분석된다.


하지만 유아동기에 겪은 체벌 경험이 성인이 된 후 배우자에 대한 폭력으로 이어질 수 있다는 연구가 잇따르면서 체벌에 대한 호주 사회의 시각을 재고해야 한다는 목소리가 나오고 있다.


호주 퀸즈랜드 공과대학 연구원 엔젤리카 폴센이 '더 컨버세이션'에 기고한 최근 연구 동향에 따르면 체벌 역시 심각한 폭력과 학대와 마찬가지로 아이의 스트레스와 두려움을 키우며 이는 배우자 폭력의 전조인 폭음, 우울, 반사회적 폭력성으로 이어진다고 경고하고 있다.




◆한국은 세계 62번째로 체벌 금지 국가가 됐지만 호주는 여전히 합리적 체벌을 인정한다. ©'아동폭력 근절을 위한 글로벌 파트너십'(Global Partnership to End Violence Against Children)


한국은 지난 3월 세계 62번째로 아동 체벌 금지 국가가 되었다. 반면, 학교와 가정의 '합리적 체벌'을 법으로 호주. 문제는 법에 ‘합리적 체벌’의 범위를 구체적으로 명시하지 않고 있다는 점이다.


호주 개별 주 가운데 합리적 체벌의 범위를 명문화 하고 있는 곳은 시드니(Sydney) 시가 속한 뉴사우스웨일스(New South Wales)주 정도다.


뉴사우스웨일스주의 아동보호와 신체적 학대에 관한 법률(Crimes Amendment Act 2001: Child Protection-Physical Mistreatment) 제 89조는 아동의 머리나 목에 가하는 체벌 및 고통이 "단기간"(short period of time) 이상 지속되는 체벌을 금하고 있다. 하지만 여전히 ‘단기간’이 어느 정도인가는 명확치 않다.


체벌은 양육자의 사적인 권리이며 이러한 ‘사적 영역’에 국가가 개입하는 것을 탐탁지 않게 여기는 호주인의 성향 때문일까? 호주 성인들도 법적 체벌 금지에 호의적이지만은 않다.


한국의 체벌 금지 선언과 호주의 '합법적 체벌 허용’은 극명히 대비된다. 혹자는 여기서 예상 밖의 '선진국의 민낯'을 다시 발견할지도 모른다.


호주가 아동 체벌 금지를 명확히 법에 명문화하기까지는 아직 멀어 보인다. 한국 또한 형식적인 법 조항을 넘어 진정 아동이 살기 좋은 사회로 나아가길 기대한다.


호주 브리즈번 = 이금종 글로벌 리포터 kumchong.lee@gmail.com


■ 필자 소개

퀸즈랜드 소수민족 협의회 팟캐스터

옥외광고센터 해외통신원

퀸즈랜드 대학교 PhD

Australia Awards - Kapyong Commemorative Scholarship

호주를 인종차별 국가로 가르치겠다고?..교육과정 개편에 보수진영 십자포화

호주를 인종차별 국가로 가르치겠다고?..교육과정 개편에 보수진영 십자포화:



호주를 인종차별 국가로 가르치겠다고?..교육과정 개편에 보수진영 십자포화이금종 입력 2021. 07. 06.
 




지난 2015년 한국 사회를 뜨겁게 달궜던 한국사 교과서 ‘국정화’ 논란은 학교에서 무엇을 어떻게 가르치느냐의 문제가 교육 제도를 넘어 정치 문제로 비화될 수 있음을 보여줬다.

현재 교육 과정 개편이 진행 되고 있는 호주에서도 보수 세력이 개정 교육과정 초안에 조직적으로 반발하며 이념 대결로 치닫고 있다.

교과 개정은 ‘친좌파’의 도구라는 보수진영


첫 '포문'은 보수적 싱크탱크인 공공문제 연구소(Institute of Public Affairs)에서 쏘아 올렸다.

개정 교과 과정을 '교육을 통한 (정치)운동'으로 규정한 연구소는 학교 교육이 학생들을 '친좌파', '반기독교', '반호주' 성향으로 만들 것이라고 주장하며 5월부터 교과 개정 반대 캠페인을 벌였다.

공공문제 연구소는 설문조사 결과를 내세워 일반 시민들은 '호주의 역사와 정체성을 비판적으로 보는 시각'을 가르치는 것을 골자로 하는 이번 교육 개정에 ‘반대’한다고 강조했다. 하지만 설문에 사용된 문구가 특정 응답을 유도할 가능성이 높아 조사의 신뢰성에는 논란의 여지가 있다.

교과 개정 과정에서 드러난 호주판 ‘백래시’

교과 과정 개정 논쟁은 6월 말 연방 상원에서 '비판적 인종 이론'(Critical Race Theory)을 교과서에 넣지 못하도록 하는 동의안이 통과되며 분수령을 맞았다.

대중에게는 생소한 ‘비판적 인종 이론’은 인종차별과 혐오를 개인의 문제가 아닌 사회 구조적 문제로 접근하는 학술 이론으로 최근 미국 내 보수 진영의 대대적 공격을 받으며 논쟁의 중심에 섰다.

미국의 대표적인 보수 언론 폭스뉴스는 지난 서너 달 사이 1,300회 이상 비판적 인종 이론을 언급하며 의제를 주도했다. 그리고 이는 텍사스 등 보수 성향의 주에서 비판적 인종 이론 교육을 금지하는 법안으로 귀결됐다.

교육 과정 개편을 두고 드러난 호주 보수 진영의 움직임 역시 미국 사회의 인종주의적 백래시(사회의 변화에 대한 반발)와 궤를 같이한다. 호주판 인종주의적 ‘백래시’인 것이다.

‘비판적 인종 이론’을 교과서에서 제외시킨 상원 동의안을 주도한 이는 원네이션(One Nation)의 폴린 핸슨(Pauline Hanson) 의원이다. 그는 개정 교육과정이 호주인의 정체성을 ‘부끄럽고 반성해야 하는 것’으로 세뇌시킨다고 비판했다.

비판적 인종 이론이 ‘미국 사회의 분열과 갈등을 유발하는 거짓 이론’이라고 강조한 트럼프의 주장과 다르지 않다.




◆극우 정당 원 네이션은 '호주식 삶의 방식'에 소구함으로써 지지를 얻는다. ©게티이미지

결국은 백인 중심 국가 드러낸 것?

호주 사회는 미국과 달리 우려할 수준의 인종 갈등이 없고 다문화 사회의 공고화에 비교적 성공했다는 내외의 평가가 많았다. 또한 호주 극우 세력이 비록 정치권에 오랜 기간 존재해왔지만 유의미한 영향력을 발휘하지는 못했던 터라 '비판적 인종 이론'에 반기를 든 이번 동의안 통과는 다양한 분석을 낳고 있다.

퀸즈랜드대학교 저널리즘 교수인 리처드 머레이(Richard Murray) 박사는 ‘호주식 삶의 방식’에 대한 희구가 호주인 저변에 보편적으로 존재함을 보여준 것이라 분석했다. 나아가 이런 경향이 호주에서 제도화되고 정착한 인종, 문화적 다양성과 각 개인들이 가진 다양성 인식 수준 사이의 괴리로 이어진다고 지적했다.

다문화 사회 진입을 선언한 지 10년이 넘은 한국 사회에서 인종 및 소수자 갈등은 더 이상 먼 나라 이야기가 아니다.

대표적인 다문화 국가인 호주에서 인종 교육을 둘러싼 갈등 양상은 후발 다문화 사회인 한국에 나타날 논쟁의 틀을 제공할 수 있기에 그 귀추가 주목된다.

호주 브리즈번 = 이금종 글로벌 리포터 kumchong.lee@gmail.com


■ 필자 소개

브로드캐스터 - Speak My Language

옥외광고센터 해외통신원

퀸즈랜드 대학교 PhD

Australia Awards - Kapyong Commemorative Scholarship

이금종 Speak My Language

 박세진 선생님 안녕하세요,


저는 선생님의 페이스북을 즐겨보는 브리즈번에 살고있는 이금종이라고합니다. 선생님과 사모님께서 애들레이드 지역 한인 사회에서 오랜 시간 봉사하고 계신 것 같아 혹시 제가 찾는 정보를 가지고 계실 수도 있을 것 같아 이렇게 연락드립니다. Keum Jong Lee


저는 현재 Speak My Language 프로그램의 한인 커뮤니티를 담당하고 있습니다. Speak My Language 프로그램은 연방정부 사회복지부의 지원으로 각 주의 다민족 다문화 협의회에서 제작하는 프로그램으로 장애를 가지고 살아가는 다문화 커뮤니티 구성원들의 즐거운 삶(living well)에 관한 이야기를 듣고 있습니다. 


프로그램의 일환으로 장애/비장애 구분 없는 포용적 사회와 문화를 만드는데 노력하시는 한인 사업체 또는 단체의 소식을 전하려고 합니다. 혹시 애들레이드와 남호주 지역에서 장애가 있는 분께 고용의 기회나 프로그램 참여 기회를 제공하는 사업체나 단체가 있다면 인터뷰를 요청드리고자 합니다. 인터뷰를 통해 해당 사업체나 단체에 관한 소개와 홍보의 기회도 제공할 예정입니다.


예를 들면, 장애가 있는 분이 참여할 수 있는 음악프로그램, 장애가 있는 분을 고용하는 업체, 장애가 있는 분도 가입할 수 있는 스포츠센터 등등 장애에 포용적인 문화를 가진 곳이면 어디든 가능합니다. 


인터뷰는 10~15분 내외의 온라인 팟캐스트 형식으로 제작되며, Speak My Language 홈페이지를 비롯해 소셜 미디어 채널을 통해 공개됩니다. SBS, NEMBC 등 커뮤니티 라디오 방송으로 송출될 수도 있습니다.


혹시 관심이 있을 업체나 단체를 알고계신다면 프로그램 소개를 부탁드립니다. 감사합니다.


이금종 드림

speakmylanguage.com.au

--

National Disability Insurance Scheme

https://www.burnside.sa.gov.au/Community-Recreation/Disability-Access-and-Inclusion/National-Disability-Insurance-Scheme-NDIS


---

안녕하세요. 이금종 님,

이 문제에 대해서 저는 잘 몰라서 아내와 같이 이야기 해 보았습니다. 아실지도 모르겠습니다만,아내는고등학교 교사, 한글학교 교장, 통역, 한인장로교회 권사, 한인회장, 등을 해서 저보다 한인교민 사회에 발이 더 넓습니다. 우리가 알고 있는 한 애들레이드에는 장애인을 특별히 고용하는 한업 업소는 없는 것 같습니다. 한 때 National Disability Insurance Scheme에서 한인회를 접근하여 주정부가 장애인에 관해 어떤 일을 하는가를 설명하는 설명회를 하고 싶다고 하여 아내가 한인회장일 때 알선하여 이곳 장로교회에서그런 설명회를 가젔다고 합니다. 

그런데 아마 아실 것도 같지만, 한국인들은 가족 안에 장애인이 있는 것을 밝히는 것을 어려워 하는 경향이 있습니다. 주위의 사람이 알아도 그 문제를 가지고 다른 사람들과, 가까운 사람들과도, 의논하려고 하지를 않습니다. 그러니 장애인의 가족/부모가 스스로 장애인을 비장애인과 다르게 취급하는 모습이 보입니다. 호주 주류의 사회에서 장애인을 다루는 것과는 너무나 대조되는 모습인 것이죠. 그러니 한인들의 경우에는 장애인들이 장애인으로서 앞으로 나오질 않으니 한인 업체로서 장애인을 다루는 업체는 우선 숫자적으로 성립하기 힘들지 않을까 생각됩니다. 더군다나 애들레이드의 경우에는 한인 교민의 인구 자체가 적어서도 그럴 것 같습니다.

브리스번에서는 다른 경우가 있었으니 그런 관계의 일을 하시겠지만, 애들레이드의 사정은 저희가 아는 한 없는 것 같습니다. 

박세진



Monday, July 26, 2021

This Land Is Their Land: Reports from a Divided Nation : Ehrenreich, Barbara: Amazon.com.au: Books

This Land Is Their Land: Reports from a Divided Nation : Ehrenreich, Barbara: Amazon.com.au: Books:

This Land Is Their Land: Reports from a Divided Nation Paperback – 27 April 2009
by Barbara Ehrenreich  (Author)
4.1 out of 5 stars    32 ratings
See all formats and editions
Audible Logo Audiobook
$14.95

Paperback ‏ : ‎ 239 pages
----------------
Review
Provocative, angry and funny, often at the same time. - Kirkus Reviews

Ehrenreich's vicious, hilarious and striking tour de force of American culture and society today addresses a range of issues from class warfare to health care, higher education to feminism to religious institutionalization and political power. She weighs in with wit, clarity and authority that few authors can match. - Publishers Weekly

The cliché that you laugh until you cry takes on new meaning when reading This Land is Their Land. Incisive, trenchant and furious, it celebrates the have-nots. At the same time, it asks an important question: What will it take for America's beleaguered residents to rise up and say, 'Enough'? - The Indypendent

About the Author
Barbara Ehrenreich is the bestselling author of over a dozen books, including Nickel and Dimed, Bait and Switch, Bright-sided, This Land Is Their Land, Dancing In The Streets, and Blood Rites. A frequent contributor to Harper's, The Nation, The New York Times and Time magazine, she lives in Virginia.

Customer reviews
4.1 out of 5 stars

Top reviews from other countries
Jennifer Robinson
5.0 out of 5 stars Ehrenreich is a voice for the average woman and man in the United States....READ her books!
Reviewed in the United States on 18 August 2015
Verified Purchase
Ehrenreich is a progressive thinker, a sociologist, a prolific writer, a feminist, and voice for the average woman and man in the United States. She speaks of the divide between the rich and the poor like few other authors do, and she does it eloquently, with words that are easy to grasp without having to sift through boring rhetoric of any kind. She is refreshing, and she is timely, and she is wise. I recommend ALL of her books, including this one, and I own them all. I bought them right here on Amazon for very good prices, used, and I recommend that if you want to understand the sociopolitical climate in the United States, you study this brilliant sociologist's works.
7 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Frederick S. Goethel
4.0 out of 5 stars Will Make You Wonder How They Get Away With It
Reviewed in the United States on 4 August 2008
Verified Purchase
I do not agree with everything that the author wrote in the book, but the vast majority of the material was spot on. These essays maybe short, but they carry a lot of punch. From skewering the corporate elite to Democrats and feminism, the author leaves almost no stone unturned.

The author has an easy to read, humorous style that can, and often does, have a cutting sarcastic edge. This book is well worth reading for the style of writing alone. Combined with the content, it was a read that was hard to put down.
6 people found this helpful
Report abuse
M. Kitteridge
5.0 out of 5 stars This Land is Their Land
Reviewed in the United States on 11 January 2016
Verified Purchase
This has been on my read list for long time and while clearng out my accumulated paperwork I found this that my chiropractor recommended. I love her insight and her wit- truely a breath of fresh air to not be constrained by what the Ann Ryan Nation would expect in uniform though and desention or opinion.
Report abuse
S. Bordwell
5.0 out of 5 stars Fast Easy Read
Reviewed in the United States on 12 August 2008
Verified Purchase
This book is very informative and a fast read. Every chapter is about 2 pages but filled with facts. It is an easy read and makes a good bedtime book because you can read a few pages and you've covered a few topics. After I read this book, I gave it to my sister to read and she thought it was very interesting and well written. My sister isn't into politics so I think this is a good book that will inform all sorts of readers about what is going on in our world today.
6 people found this helpful
Report abuse
John G. Curington
3.0 out of 5 stars good food for thought, though could be better
Reviewed in the United States on 14 July 2010
Verified Purchase
In 2001, Barbara Ehrenreich published "Nickel and Dimed"- a touching and revealing exposé about low-wage jobs in the US. "Nickel and Dimed" was spectacular.

I expected something similar with "This Land is Their Land," but I was a little disappointed. Rather than being a coherent story, "This Land is Their Land" is a collection of essays. The good part of this is that she can cover many disparate topics. For example, her essays range from inequality, to health care, religion, and sex. She has thoughtful ideas on all of these topics. On the other hand, I felt a bit unfulfilled by each of her essays. She makes good points, but this book lacks the depth of "Nickel and Dimed."

On the whole, though, "This Land" was worthwhile and thought-provoking.
3 people found this helpful
Report abuse
See all reviews
===
COMMUNITY REVIEWS
Showing 1-30
 Average rating3.55  ·  Rating details ·  1,465 ratings  ·  239 reviews

Search review text


All Languages
More filters | Sort order
Sejin,
Sejin, start your review of This Land Is Their Land: Reports from a Divided Nation

Write a review
Displaying 1-30 of 272 reviews rated 5 stars.  Clear filters
Heidi
Jun 25, 2008Heidi rated it it was amazing
Ehrenreich has this amazing ability to look critically at social, political, education and economic policy and point out exactly where the policiy falls short of meeting its supposed goal. I think this is an important book for people to read because, even though each chapter is short and doesn't list a whole host of numbers and statistics (although she sights, of course, for your researching if you're so inclined) she really gets you think about the flip side of the current administration's policies. And while she's certainly harder on the Conservatives, she even busts on my boy Bill and other Democrats because she's not out to win an election for someone- she's out to make people think. So I would recommend this book to anyone who intends to vote in 2008, particularly if you think that the past 8 years have been decent or better. I know there are a lot of people who might ask- yeah, but does she offer solutions? And she does, in a tongue in cheek way, and I think the reason that she takes this approach is because the solutions to a lot of these problems are not complicated to figure out.Its a good sit in the bookstore and read kind of book- my favorite chapter is entitled "Children Deserve Veterinary Care, too". Check it out. (less)
flag8 likes · Like  · comment · see review
Helen
Feb 20, 2009Helen rated it it was amazing
For those readers familiar with Ehrenreich’s “Nickel and Dimed” and “Bait and Switch”, Ehrenreich offers a different type book here. Rather than inserting herself into a typical working-class existence, through a series of essays she examines the current state of America and what it means for the average American. From corporate irresponsibility to prisoner abuse, Ehrenreich intensely scrutinizes the duplicity of American politics and culture. Much of what she has to say, in my humble opinion, is right on target. For instance, in regards to the role that religion and spirituality currently plays in our current political culture she says, “…what both parties need to understand is that economic issues are moral issues. Poverty is a moral issue; 47 million Americans without health insurance is a moral issue. The same goes for the environment: why fight to save a fertilized egg cell for a life spent gasping for air or fleeing the ever-rising coastlines? If you’re going to be prolife, you’ve got to be proenvironment and pro-economic justice.”

I found Ehrenreich’s viewpoints to be enlightening and her writing style terribly amusing. At times, however, her sarcasm was a little over the top and might prevent reader’s who disagree with her points to discount her arguments entirely.
(less)
flag2 likes · Like  · comment · see review
Joe Robles
Apr 23, 2010Joe Robles rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
This is a great book about what's wrong with our country. Ehrenriech doesn't just write about what's wrong, but if you've read her previous books then you know she also lives it. Before Spurlock did 30 days Ehrenriech was working for minimum wage and trying to see if it was possible to actually survive on that (spoiler alert: you can't).

This book touches on several subjects including corporate greed, religion, gay marriage, and immigration. Her prose is biting and funny. She may be a grandma, but she's got the snark of a Jon Stewart. If you love the Daily Show and Colbert Report then this book's for you. (less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Dennis Littrell
Jul 24, 2019Dennis Littrell rated it it was amazing
Kicks butt

Verbally speaking.

I'm jealous. I like to think that I can write hot, sharp prose that singes the footsies of the miscreants on the Right; but I can't hold a candle to Barbara Ehrenreich (so to speak), nor can most journalists/social critics working in America today. Take one part suffragette tea, stir in some leftover Wobbly stew, add a dash of farm worker's jalapeno pepper, some heartland hardtack, garnish with some Lesbo Island fig chutney and serve with a mason jar of limousine liberal Chablis and you've got a fair approximation of the kind of dish Ms. Ehrenreich is.

Here she is on the political tactics of Republican Christians:

"Distraction was the means to get people to vote against their own economic self-interest--that is, for tax cuts for the rich, cuts in social programs for everyone else, and endless war. The real threats to well-being, people were told, are abortionists, stem cell researchers, and matrimonially minded gays…All the guy in the pulpit had to say was 'vote pro-life' or 'save the family from marauding gays,' and the message got through: vote Republican, which translated into feed the fat cats straight from your wallet." (pp. 225-226)

And here she is rallying the feminist troops:

"…[W]e need a kind of feminism that aims not just to assimilate into the institutions that men have created over the centuries but to infiltrate and transform them.

"To cite an old and far from naïve feminist saying: 'If you think equality is the goal, your standards are too low.' It is not enough to be equal to men, when the men are acting like beasts. It is not enough to assimilate. We need to create a world worth assimilating into." (p. 196)

Ehrenreich believes that health care costs are sucking the blood out of the economy. She writes:

"Most countries are proud to have a health care system. It's an organized way of helping the sick and infirm--a mark of genuine civilization. Not so here, alas, where the health system is rapidly becoming a health hazard. After decades of privatizing, profiteering, and insurance company-driven bureaucratization, Florence Nightingale has morphed into Vampira." (p. 167)

Ehrenreich is worried about the "Invasion of the Cheerleaders": "The New York Times reports that drug companies are increasingly hiring college cheerleaders as their sales reps--to the point where there is a 'recruiting pipeline' from college cheerleading squads direct to Big Pharma's sales force. One attraction of cheerleaders is simply that they're attractive, and doctors are still about 75 percent male." She asks, "Will that potentially hazardous, $300-a-month prescription drug actually help you, or was your doctor just charmed by a cheerleader's dazzling, gloss-enhanced smile?" (pp. 123-124)

Noting that economic growth has not in recent years translated into higher real income for American families, Ehrenreich writes:

"The soothsayers have slaughtered the ox and are examining the gloppy entrails for signs: rising unemployment, a falling dollar, weak consumer spending, the credit crisis, a swooning stock market. Could there be something wrong here? Could we actually be approaching a, God forbid, recession?" (p. 94) She adds, "As Bill McKibben argues in his book Deep Economy, the 'cult of growth' has led to global warming, ghastly levels of pollution, and diminishing resources. Tumors grow, at least until they kill their hosts; economies ought to be sustainable." (p. 97)

(I would ask, is capitalism a ponzi scheme on the future?)

I think Ehrenreich is at her best when she rushes, populist banner held high, into America's ongoing class warfare:

"I'm not upset by the $210 million dollar parachute CEO Robert Nardelli received as a send-off from Home Depot. Not at all. To those critics who see it as one more step in the slide from free-market capitalism to a gluttonous free-for-all, I say: What do you really know about Nardelli's circumstances? Maybe he has a dozen high-maintenance ex-trophy wives to support, each with a brood of special-needs offspring. Ever think of what that would cost?

"Or he may have a rare disease that can be held at bay only by daily infusions of minced fresh gorilla liver. Just try purchasing a gorilla a day for purposes of personal consumption--or any other endangered species, for that matter. There are the poachers to pay, the smugglers, the doctors and vets. I'm just saying: Don't start envisioning offshore bank accounts and 50,000-square-foot fourth homes until you know the whole story." (p. 17)

The book is a collection of short pieces arranged under seven sections entitled, "Chasms of Inequality," "Meanness on the Rise," "Strangling the Middle Class," "Hell Day at Work," "Declining Health," "Getting Sex Straight," and "False Gods." Versions of some of these pieces originally appeared in publications like The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, The Progressive, and The Nation. I suspect some of the others are from her blog on the Internet, but I didn't check. I still like to read from the pages of a book instead of from a computer screen. It's handier. And besides I can't stand lying in bed with a laptop on my chest. Maybe Amazon will send me a Kindle.

--Dennis Littrell, author of the mystery novel, “Teddy and Teri”
(less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Lukasz
Nov 11, 2019Lukasz rated it it was amazing
Bardzo ciekawa książka. Autorka porusza w niej sporo tematów dotyczących sprawiedliwości społecznej w Stanach Zjednoczonych, a może raczej powinienem powiedzieć, braku sprawiedliwości społecznej w społeczeństwie amerykańskim.

Często Stany Zjednoczone kojarzone są z tak zwanym „Amerykańskim Snem”. Jednak rzeczywistość opisana w tej książce dalego odbiega od tego stereotypu. Autorka właśnie przez tą książke stara soę obalić ten stereotyp.

Społeczeństwo amerykańskie jest pełne kontrastów. Z jednej st ...more
flagLike  · comment · see review
Mona Ammon
Apr 17, 2018Mona Ammon rated it it was amazing
Shelves: 2018
TITLE: This Land is Their Land: Reports from a Divided Nation
WHY I CHOSE THIS BOOK: It fit in my reading challenge being connected to the book before it, On Tyranny, by being of the same format, essays
REVIEW: This author also wrote Nickle and Dimed which I have heard a lot about but had not read. I liked This Land is Their Land so much I am definitely going to read Nickel and Dimed very soon. It was brutally funny. Using hyperbole and bringing faulty points of view to their extreme conclusions she points on the lack of logic and hypocrisy of some points of view. I grew up poor and don't hold people's economic status, past or present against someone. However, reading this book made me realize how how subconsciously there are times when I blame the victim for their circumstances. It is not to say an individual has no role and cannot have any impact on their circumstances but there are a whole host of reasons beyond people's control. This book also makes clear the ways in which the 1% (my term) manipulate the emotions of the working class to deflect them from displaying unhappiness upward. The way they present workers with false choices. Either you get to have "a job" or you get worker's rights, but anything we give you will only jeopardize our ability to continue to give you a job. Quote from the book "..... the same arguments Americans hear whenever they raise a timid plea for a higher minimum wage, or a halt to the steady erosion of pensions and health benefits. What scream the economists who flack for the employing class, 'If you do anything, anything at all, to offend or discomfit the employers they will respond by churlishly failing to employee you.'" The point how the Bible is used to distract workers from economic issues by bringing up social issues. Even though, as she points out, many of the topics the right wing flogs get no or small mention in the Bible but poverty and economic justice which are mentioned hundreds of times are not talked about the right wing. In fact, instead, those in poverty are often blamed for their circumstances and it stated as a moral failing. This is a very eye opening book. She mentions a lot of other books that I plan to read as well. Even though this was a book of essays it was better researched than a Glen Beck or Bill O'Reilly book.
(less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Paula Adams
Apr 11, 2018Paula Adams rated it it was amazing
She is so concise, so clear, and so well spoken. Even though this book is several years old it is still timely and on point. This was hard for me to read given my stay sane vs stay well informed issues. I highly recommend this book and all her works.
flagLike  · comment · see review
Donna Wolff
Sep 15, 2020Donna Wolff rated it it was amazing
A book full of essays on political topics. Written with sarcasm and wit. I found the subject matter still topical. A funny and interesting take on the state of American life and our politics.
flagLike  · comment · see review
Peter
Mar 26, 2020Peter rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Great collection of essays on today's America, full of witty repartee. I definitely recommend it for these epidemic times. ...more
flagLike  · comment · see review
Cindy
Oct 15, 2008Cindy rated it it was amazing
Recommends it for: anyone with a conscience
Shelves: political
And I thought I was liberal! Ehrenreich is spot-on and brilliant. She takes on the Rich, Democrats, Republicans and all matter of hypocrites in between. Exploring the growing gap between the wealthy and the rest of us, the author is a great voice for the voiceless.

The book is written in short (2-4 pages)essays under larger categories such as, CHASMS OF INEQUALITY, MEANNESS ON THE RISE, STRANGLING THE MIDDLE CLASS, HELL DAY AT WORK, DECLINING HEALTH, GETTING SEX STRAIGHT and FALSE GODS.

Ehrenreich is also a bawdy smart-ass. In one essay she complains that the powers that be refer to the economy as if it were a large deflated sex organ - just waiting to be engorged again.

There's also this take on Gender Equality: "What we have learned from Abu Ghraib, once and fo all, is that a uterus is not a substitute for a conscience. This doesn't mean gender equality isn't worth fighting for for its own sake. It is. If we believe in democracy, than we believe in a woman's right to do and achieve whatever men can do and achieve, even the bad things. It's just that gender equality cannot, all by itself, bring about a just and peaceful world."

Take that Sarah Palin!

I'm still smiling the second time through it. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Molly
Feb 25, 2010Molly rated it it was amazing
Easily the angriest, most revolutionary book I have read in a long time, I really enjoyed this collection of Ehrenreich's essays from 2007-08.

Just one of the interesting thought experiments she conducts in the book, she quips, “we can expect the Heritage Foundation to reveal any day now that some seniors are cashing in their Social Security checks for vodka and Viagra. Just as welfare was said to ‘cause poverty,’ the experts may soon announce that Medicare causes baldness and that Social Security is a risk factor for osteoporosis: the correlations are undeniable.”

While Ehrenreich makes most of her big points in a witty way, her call to think more about the disparities that exist in America today really resounds. Looking forward to the revolution. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Sue
May 04, 2009Sue rated it it was amazing
Recommends it for: middle or high school social studies teachers for their students
Shelves: nonfiction
I really enjoyed this because it made me think and it made me upset. I want to show this book to our social studies teacher and have him read it, and think about if the 8th graders could possibly work on a social justice/community service project stemming from one of the essays in the book. Since the book's essays cover a wide range of topics that affect them directly, like health care, sex education, _regular_ public school education, growing poverty -- I think it would be important for them as future citizens to learn about something and research ideas to make things better (or at least draw more attention to something that everyone should know but doesn't). (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Desiree
Aug 12, 2008Desiree rated it it was amazing
Very different from her other books in that she seems VERY bitter about what is happening in this country. Mostly about how the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, each chapter tackling a different subject.

One thing that really bothered me reading this book is that hospitals are now putting people in jail if they cannot pay their bill! Yep, I already knew that uninsured people are charged more than those whose insurance companies have negotiated lower rates for them. Yale-New Haven hospital has obtained 65 arrest warrants for delinquent debtors over the past three years.... What is happening to this country???? (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Krista
May 02, 2012Krista rated it it was amazing
Another classic collection of serious yet side splitting truths about our country, and more specifically, our ass backwards government. While this collection was released in 2006 and references Dubya here and there it is still relevant today (especially during this lovely election year). Ehrenreich uses humor and satire throughout to convey the hypocrisy, injustice and plain old fuckery taking place every day under our noses while we are being tricked into arguing about abortion and gay marriage. Brilliant. Barbara Ehrenreich is my non-fiction mother. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
------
Displaying 1-30 of 42 reviews rated 1 star.  Clear filters
Becca 
Jan 02, 2009Becca rated it did not like it
I really liked Nickel and Dimed. It was original, clever, frightening and a total page-turner. I read it while restocking the shelves at a university bookstore, getting paid $6.50 an hour. It resonated.
But this book? What happened? Here's how I imagine it:

Publisher: we need another book from you.
Barbara: Ugh, but I'm so busy with my speaking schedule I haven't been working on anything new.
Publisher: we need it in three weeks.
Barbara: Hum, okay, I'll hobble together something from my blog, random things I've read on the internet, and spurious unfounded assumptions that will make even severely left-leaning Rebecca roll her eyes and snort.

And Voila! You have "This Land is Their Land."

Now, there could be perfectly legitimate ideas in here, and even some "truths." But how can I rely on this author when one of her points is as follows:

The rich associate the poor with fat, i.e. greasy spoon. Therefore, the rich don't eat fat, but instead eat high-carb low fat diets. Therefore they are hungry all the time. Therefore they are miserable. Therefore they try to satiate their misery with money. Which they extort from poor people.
If rich people just ate more butter, they would give up their champagne-filled jacuzzis and pay a living wage to their Dominican maids.

Gyuuuuuuuhghghshghgh the sound of my brain melting out of my ear.

Sometimes it seems like she is going for a satirical note-- like she's been gorging on Michael Moore for a couple of weeks and is imitating his funny snarky tone. But Michael Moore's books got me outraged, dubious, curious, invested, and best of all, ROTFL. This book's just got me rolfing.

Sorry Barbara! Keep up the good work!

(less)
flag9 likes · Like  · comment · see review
D.M. Dutcher 
Feb 27, 2012D.M. Dutcher rated it did not like it
Shelves: bad-nonfiction, politics, nonfiction
This is a collection of two-page at best short little rambles about various subjects that approach liberal cliche. I actually enjoyed her Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America and am sympathetic to her populist form of liberalism, but this book is a mess. Each little snippet simply is too short to even work as snapshots. By the time she warms up to her argument, it's over and on to the next one.

They are also much stereotypical and less measured than her other books. Without the human equation, and talking to other people, it loses a lot of what makes her writing appealing. Some of the subjects cry out for more length-skewering popular business books, or how a pharmaceutical company hires cheerleaders to sell, because of the fake positive attitude they can project. But most are drearingly typical rants about favorite liberal stalking horses, and so brief that they blur into each other.

I recommend avoiding this and picking up her longer works. They are much more appealing regardless of your political views. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Leigh
May 07, 2009Leigh rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 2009, gave-away
SUCH a disappointment! I loved Nicked and Dimed; I thought Bait and Switch a solid follow-up, if perhaps not quite as sharp or sassy as its predecessor. But this work was just limp and uninspired.

If you were expecting a book with a solid thesis, look elsewhere; This Land is Their Land is just a collection of essays by Ehrenreich, some of which have been previously published in other sources. Lacking any formal citations, they read as editorials - Ehrenreich's opinions, nothing more. And unfortunately, with no research to back up those opinions, they become quite grating - even to a reader that has, in the past, agreed with at least some of her opinions and philosophies.

(In truth, by the end, I was not only irritated, but downright confused. What's with the religion-bashing at the end? In her criticism of religion, I couldn't help feeling like she was throwing out the baby with the bathwater, and ignoring the good aspects of many religious organizations.)

Frankly, whether you are familiar with Ehrenreich or not, I'd give this one a pass. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Terri Lynn
Feb 28, 2014Terri Lynn rated it did not like it
Shelves: nonfiction, sociology-and-culture
Surprisingly, I didn't like it. I had liked a previous book of the author's but this one was just her taking a serious subject and writing a bunch of short chapters with snarky personal opinions, many that made no sense or were just attacks minus facts or information to judge by. Here is an example: she and a friend went to Driggs,Idaho where, just over the Tetons, was wealthy Jackson Hole. They rented a little place where they could enjoy the same mountains and trails that the rich did though living in an area where hotel and restaurant workers did. Some rich people moved in and she grumbled that they had no right to be there.She said she takes it "personally" and "needs to see vast expanses". Well, who is stopping her?

I am disturbed by Corporate America and the 1% and the CEOs but she is just randomly choosing people to blame for everything and to raise hell about while offering no proof of anything said nor any workable solutions.

Don't bother. It isn't worth it. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Laura
Jun 09, 2011Laura rated it did not like it
Uuuugggghhhh. Apparently, like many others, I read Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America and Bait and Switch: The (Futile) Pursuit of the American Dream and really enjoyed Barbara Ehrenreich's voice. Apparently, I didn't read the dustjacket closely enough to understand this book was meant to be SATIRE. Don't get me wrong. I agree with pretty much every position she takes on every single page. But I just really couldn't bear the glib tone. That's pretty much all it boils down to. I just wanted to shout, "Oh, quit being a pompous ass!" throughout the whole thing. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Bryan
Jul 10, 2014Bryan rated it did not like it
This book was dreadful, and I'm allegedly someone who is right in Ehrenreich's wheelhouse: liberal, progressive, committed to social justice. I found these short rants to lack depth and real critical thinking on the part of the author. I would have loved to see some citations, because without them she seems like someone who gets her news from Buzzfeed lists and email forwards. Attempts at being funny or sarcastic just made her seem snarky. The last third of the book (about sex and religion) felt like it was entirely out of place, but since there wasn't really a cogent argument here I guess that's not surprising. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Tracy Miller
Nov 16, 2008Tracy Miller rated it did not like it
Shelves: did-not-finish
You know...she's like Rush Limbaugh for liberals (well, Rush + 50 IQ points). But definitely the same passion and...I just got too tired to finish it. I guess it is escapist of me, but I don't want to read about the horrifying state of the world in the midst of the economic meltdown we're currently in. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Joseph
Sep 20, 2008Joseph rated it did not like it
Shelves: non-fiction
This was a disappointment. SHe writes with no direction or overarching theme, the book just turns into a gripe session concerning the state of America. It's like watching the Colbert Report. Each chapter she attacks a new subject....from the repression of this to the abuse of that. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
-----
Displaying 1-30 of Top 300 reviews rated 4 stars.  Clear filters
Robert
Sep 28, 2013Robert rated it really liked it
Barbara Ehrenreich is the kind of writer you might know about...and know her views in general...but may not have read. That's how it was for me until the last few days when I ripped through This Land is Their Land:Reports from a Divided Nation. She is what used to be called a liberal, not a bad word in my book, and she attacks the growing wealth divide in the U.S. with ferocity, humor, cutting wit, solid facts, and chilling anecdotes.

The style of this volume is one short, snappy chapter after another. I don't know this, but I guess these chapters began as blog comments and then were built out. She takes on the financial crash, greedy CEOs, the plight of the young and old trying to find work, the way corporations like Walmart (she really skewers Walmart; don't shop there!) exploit their workers, and so forth. Can you imagine Walmart tell its aging "greeters" that they can't have stools anymore? Welcome to the world of cost-cutting at all costs. She also takes a good look at feminism, abortion, gay marriage, and the way in which the Republican party and evangelicals have woven their snake-like way together to produce a truly venomous anti-Christian Christianity. The war in Iraq? As bad as Walmart!

She doesn't say it exactly the way I like to say it, but she makes this point: There is class warfare going on in America but it's not being waged by the poor against the rich, it's being waged by the rich against the poor...and it's all but over. The poor are hardly worth bothering about. The rich are now out to squeeze the Chinese, Indians and Vietnamese. Our middle class got a flat tire in the seventies and we've been running on the rim ever since. She even points out that the wealth gap between CEOs and their number #3 executives has spread. Pity the #3s. A fellow told me last week about one of his neighbors who had a mid-to-high level job at Blue Shield/Blue Cross in North Carolina and earned $350,000 a year. He said to her, "What do you do?" She told him. He said, "Hell, I could do that." She said, "You probably could." So Ehrenreich suggests we reform the health care system by outsourcing it to the Third World. This would mean those overpaid executives would be out of work, and our fine doctors and nurses would have to practice in Mexico and Thailand, but we'd save a bundle.

I don't want to try to out-Ehrenreich Ehrenreich, but I'd like to close this note with a confession. I already knew most of what she wrote. I think that's true of a lot of thinking Americans. What's puzzling is that we understand exactly the four or five major tragedies that led to our current difficulties, and yet it's so hard to make that the dominant theme of the day. At the moment the Republicans in the House of Representatives may help us change that by shutting down the government in their effort to defund Obamacare. I don't want to see the government shut down, but if it brings the temple of greed crashing upon the right wingers' heads, let it fall.

For more of my comments on contemporary writing, see Tuppence Reviews (Kindle). (less)
flag2 likes · Like  · 1 comment · see review
Kkraemer
Feb 19, 2017Kkraemer rated it really liked it
Barbara Ehrenreich has long been a voice for those who are working so hard that they don't have time to raise their voice...at least to anyone who can help them. In this book, copyrighted in 2008 before the big crash, she includes many poignant chapters, the most interesting of which is titled "Can You Afford to Be Poor?"
In this chapter, she notes that there is a "ghetto two," a higher cost of living for low-income neighborhoods. This includes higher property tax rates (the basis for school funding in many states), higher food costs (to make up for theft), higher insurance rates (ditto), and higher costs for borrowing (your rate is based on your credit rating, part of which is based on your income. If your income is lower, your rate for borrowing will be higher). Add to that the cost of trying to get into rental housing (first, last, and a month's rent), compared with the cost of living in a motel...or saving for furniture or a car or appliances as opposed to getting things from rent-to-own, a dealer-based auto loan, or higher-cost appliances loans, and you can see that life on the lower side of the income ladder is a bit more dicey.
The astonishing thing about this book, though, is that it was written BEFORE current times. It was written back in what seems now the flower-strewn fields of green that were the Bush days. In it, she talks about healthcare, low-paying employment, life at the office, and the loss of the middle class. While the book seems like a series of rants, they're tame compared to what would be written today.
(less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Jason
Dec 26, 2012Jason rated it really liked it
This is a collection of articles by Barbara Ehrenreich (of Nickel and Dimed fame), mostly dealing with the class divide in America and other related issues. To me this was a quick but refreshing read, reminding me why I'm a lifelong lefty, and articulating my beliefs much clearer than I could.

Here were some of the highlights for me...

- "Private health insurance is only for people who aren't likely ever to get sick. In fact, why call it 'insurance,' which normally embodies the notion of risk sharing? This is extortion."

- "What is this fixation on growth anyway?... the 'cult of growth' has lead to global warming, ghastly levels of pollution, and diminishing resources. Tumors grow, at least until they kill their hosts; economies ought to be sustainable."

- "If anyone is ruining the American family, it's all the employers who refuse to recognize that their employees have family responsibilities as well as jobs... those who don't pay enough for their employees to live on... and those who abuse their salaried employees with expectations of ten or more hours of work per day."

- "Show me the passage in the Bible that bans stem cell research. See if you can find the tiniest allusion to abortion. Yes, there's homophobia in the Bible, along with endorsements of slavery and a weird obsession with animal sacrifice. Not a word, it should be mentioned, about gay marriage... Poverty and injustice, on the other hand, get over three thousand hits."

- (From a really powerful essay about Barbara's reaction to seeing pictures of female soldiers abusing prisoners at Abu Ghraib, and having to rethink her approach to feminism): "To cite an old and far from naive feminist saying: 'If you think equality is the goal, your standards are too low.' It is not enough to be equal to men, when the men are acting like beasts. It is not enough to assimilate. We need to create a world worth assimilating into." (less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Lisa
Jul 17, 2008Lisa rated it really liked it
Barbara Ehrenreich is the Michael Moore of print journalism. She tells it like it is, using statistics and facts accompanied by her always present wit. Whether it's gay marriage, abortion, low-wages or lack of health care, Ehrenreich will leave you educated and enraged. (less)
flag1 like · Like  · comment · see review
Andrew Leon
Mar 20, 2018Andrew Leon rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I'm going to say right up front: This is probably not a book you should read.
Wait, let me revise that: This is not a book you should read if you haven't read any other books by Barbara Ehrenreich.
Also: This is not a "book." It's a collection of essays.
Funny story: I didn't know that when I started reading it. Having read many other Ehrenreich books, I was more than a little thrown by how disjointed this seemed... until I realized that it was a collection of essays, then it made sense.

The other drawback is that the book is 10 years old, and there are moments when that is readily apparent. Beyond the fact that she's talking about the Bush presidency, that is. There are some things that have dropped out of the national consciousness since the book was published, which can leave you wondering why that was even something being talked about at the time. Like the attack on Cabbage Patch dolls back in the 80s by Right-wing nutjobs. Not that that is in the book, but it's one of those things that, when you look back at it, it leaves you scratching your head "why?!?!"

That said, this book still has a point to make, and it's a point that needs to be made again and again until people realize they need to do something about it rather than wait for someone else to fix it for them. Especially since the someone they are hoping will fix the problem are the very ones who are the problem: the 1%.

Unfortunately, the book will also highlight for you many of the ways we are regressing back to all of the places we were 10 years ago. Like, say, health care. Which got better for a brief period with Obamacare but, which, now, is being killed slowly by Trump (#fakepresident) and his goons. Or, say, banks...

Look, "we" put Dodd-Frank in place to prevent banks from doing things like they did that caused the economic collapse a decade ago. You do remember that, right? It was so bad that people were just walking away from their homes. You haven't forgotten, have you? The answer, or part of it, was Dodd-Frank. Of course, the 1% want to be able to bleed everyone else for as much as they can get, and they don't much like regulations which protect the consumer so, again, Trump (#fakepresident) and his Republican death machine have undone much of what was put in place to protect everyone else.

Actually, when you look at what happened there with the banks, it's like they were merely put in a time out. They had a club they were beating on people with and had it taken away from them and told to go sit in the corner. All the Republicans went to go play in the corner with the banks until they could maneuver the club around to someone who would give it back to the banks. It's all really rather sickening and the sheep who make up the people who vote for Republicans and who can't see beyond the dog-whistle words of "abortion" and "guns" will contentedly continue to gnaw off their own legs rather then open their eyes and look at what's being done to them by people like Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnel, and the ever-blazing Trumpster fire who thinks he's a president.

Yeah, okay, none of that last paragraph was in the book, because it was written more than a decade ago, but there are sections of the book that really resonate with what's happening right now, especially since Dodd-Frank is being dismantled right now, so you can see the return to the things she's talking about in the book.

Anyway... If you've read other Ehrenreich books and enjoyed them, you'll probably find this a good read. Besides, it's quick, especially if you read it as bites of essays here and there. If you haven't read Ehrenreich, go get a copy of Nickel and Dimed or Bright-sided and start with that. (less)
flagLike  · comment · see review
Peggy
Apr 07, 2019Peggy rated it really liked it
this was written in ...2007 or 8?..and a lot of it is true to this day. Very disturbing information about the divide between the haves and have nots. Ehrenreich is so good at putting things in words in a way that is informational and lively.
flagLike  · comment · see review
Pamela
Jun 08, 2018Pamela rated it really liked it
Shelves: non_fiction, politics-political, own-read, type-essays, z-mt_tbr_ch_2018, notes
Some of the essays are a little outdated, from the Bush era, pre-Affordable Health Care Act & many essays about health care woes. Also gay rights, marriage has changed. Read this book and you will see there is progress!
flagLike  · comment · see review








Saturday, July 24, 2021

True History of the Profound Mexico/3 - Wikisource, the free online library

True History of the Profound Mexico/3 - Wikisource, the free online library

Translation:True History of the Profound Mexico/3
< Translation:True History of the Profound Mexico
Jump to navigationJump to search
← 1.0 THE WORLD´S OLDEST CIVILIZATIONS True History of the Profound Mexico by Guillermo Marín Ruiz, translated from Spanish by Wikisource and  Wikisource
2.0 DIFFICULTIES IN LEARNING THE ANCIENT HISTORY OF MEXICO 3.0 THE ANÁHUAC CIVILIZATION..→
2. DIFFICULTIES IN LEARNING THE ANCIENT HISTORY OF MEXICO

There is a contaminated, confusing and complex cloud that prevents us from knowing the history of our ancient past. Among existing problems in this regard we can, at least, mention the following:

1. The 5 century old cultural colonialism, which condemned the vanquished peoples to lose their historic memory, in order to completely and permanently dominate them. From 1521 onward those who have held power during this time period, whether conquerors, colonizers or creoles, have developed a complex and efficient system so that the children of the children of the invaded—defeated, lose contact with their ancient origins and link their past to the arrival of the dominant culture. The dominant culture titled the 7,500 years of human development prior to the invasion "Pre-Hispanic history". That is, our Old Grandfathers were divested of their name and are now called "before the Spaniards". Because of the colonization processes we now do not know how they called themselves, or how they called this land.

2. Little is known of the first two periods (Pre-classic and Classic), because when the late Classic or pinnacle period ended, the knowledge centers and those who inhabited them, mysteriously disappeared without a trace and left no tangible evidence of their passing, for they destroyed and buried, not only their impressive buildings, but basically the wisdom and knowledge that allowed their apex.

3. The Aztecs in their expansion period, ordered the destruction of all important codices, where the ancient Cem Anahuac[1] historical memory was kept, and they re-wrote history, wherein they appear as the chosen people; in spite of the fact that, since the founding of México-Tenochtitlan (1325), until the arrival of the invaders (1519), only 194 years had elapsed since the Post-classic which is already considered to be a decadent phase of Anahuac civilization; during which they degraded and transgressed the Quetzalcoatl’s philosophy and religion.

4. When the conquerors arrived, they exterminated and destroyed almost all the men of knowledge and their codices, the knowledge centers, temples, and all traces of their civilization until its apparent extinction from the new Spanish world.

5. Texts written during the first century of the invasion face the following problems: the Nahuatl of those times was much richer than Castilian Spanish, chief reason why the translation of many ideas and concepts of philosophical, scientific, religious, poetical nature, proved impossible to convey and understand due to the degree of complexity and of the abstraction of the native thought, relative to the primitive european world of the middle ages. Texts written by the conquerors and native converts, were written without any scientific rigor, and were part of allegations to demonstrate their participation and "sacrifices" in the conquest, and to ask for reward or compensation from the Spanish Crown. The missionaries, who described the customs of the defeated peoples, did it in order that other men of the Church could understand native practices and be better able to evangelize the defeated.

“The history of the primitive Anahuac population is so obscure and altered with so many fables (as is that of other peoples of the world), that it is impossible to pin point the truth... Several of our historians wanting to penetrate this chaos, guided by the weak light of conjecture, futile combinations and suspicious paintings, have been lost in the darkness of antiquity and have been forced to make puerile and unfunded narrations" (Francisco Javier Clavijero. 1779)[2] The myth of the intellectual missionaries who "defended" and researched the invaded civilization is disproved by serious researchers of the Catholic Church, such as the text entitled "Flower and Song of the Birth of Mexico".

"There were some —the lesser— that, as Sahagún, devoted incredible care, worthy of the best modern anthropologist, to delve, in depth, into the Anahuac world;" but this was not due to any appreciation for it, but by the explicit and confessed desire to better destroy it. [The doctor —he asserts at the start of his monumental work— cannot accurately apply medicines to the sick unless he first knows what causes the illness... to preach against these things and even to find out if they exist, it is necessary to know how they were used]. He thus acted (Sahagún), as a captain in command, carefully studying the schematics of enemy facilities: not to admire or copy them, but to better destroy them." (Jose Luis Guerrero. 1990)[3]

Indigenous people and their culture represented "the real presence of the devil and evil" for Europeans of the 16th century and the justification for their atrocities. It also has to be considered that "informants" of the missionaries, men of knowledge, now defeated, would not hand over their wisdom to those who, they knew, wanted to obliterate it. Finally, in this regard we shall say that, in cases where the missionaries valued the “diabolical civilization” from another perspective, would be scrutinized by the Holy Inquisition and the Royal bureaucracy, which censored and destroyed any text that would cast doubt over the dogmas which sustained the church and the "just and legal" process of colonization from Spain.

"The most deplorable case in this chain of censorship and repression is that of Bernardino de Sahagún. In the fifty years that Sahagún dedicated to the compilation of the grandiose body of knowledge concerning the indigenous culture, he successively suffered the contradiction of Friars and the ecclesiastical authorities of Nueva España (New Spain), the haggling of economic support to conduct his work, the dispersal of his work, and, finally, the confiscation of all his documents, as ordered by the Viceroy Enríquez, which were sent to Spain to be examined by the Indies Council. He died without knowing what fate befell the work to which he devoted his best energies.

The requisition of Sahagún’s work was an act linked to the Crown’s decision to ensure that the knowledge of the indigenous past only served its own interests." (Enrique Florescano. 1987)[4]

6.- That the majority of the texts of about ancient Mexico were written in the late XIX and XX centuries, and were written by foreigners, with a vision of superiority imbued with a strong euro-centric dose and, in addition, “we have always been investigated by our differences and not by our similarities", and from an assumed plane of cultural superiority and as a scientific prize.

7.- Westerners have always, for their research, compared the Anahuac civilization with the European civilization. They study and explain our ancient past with the spirit, ideology and the vision of the Europeans. This is a grievous error, because the current descendants of the original peoples, the so called "indigenous" peoples, do not share the same world and life vision, not even with the Creoles and mestizos, who do not understand how these people do not want or seek "richness", the exploitation of nature, hoarding, comfort, material progress and modernity sourced externally". This was truer still during the periods of conquest and colonization.

“Thus, perhaps, it will yet be admitted that those men were not "primitive" rain worshippers, worried about the abundance or the loss of their crops, by the plausible land fertility, but rather had a metaphysical knowledge of what exists. A concept of the world that could explain the qualities of its great mathematicians, astronomers, engineers, architects, sculptors, that are, paradoxically, universally recognized

Because everyone agrees in asserting: the ancient inhabitants of Mesoamerica were distinguished engineers and architects; as is proven by the unparalleled works of the temples and plazas built as if by miracle, in forests or in summits turned into plains, in marshes converted into sound land. There is an amazing use of spaces and masses, as if they were a type of cosmic music in which blocks of silence alternate to perfection with harmonious apertures to silence.

They were, likewise, incomparable mathematicians, as is attested by their calculations, and understood the notion of zero, the measurability of movement, according to positions of before and after.

They were, also, admittedly and irrefutably, able astronomers, familiar with the motion of celestial bodies, the laws that dictate the advancement and retrocession of planets, the cyclical progression of stars, the weaning and waxing of the moon. These were all known to them by reason and experience; and their time measurement allowed them to calculate, with accuracy, and in minute detail, endless projections of calendar dates.

No one denies them the ability to create, in works that have, later on, been deemed to be art, symbolic or realistic images of in clay, wood, metal, stone, of unparalleled quality. The colors they utilized have come down to us in a multiplicity of objects whose plastic values effectively transmit the testimony of their willingness to be. They were, as is universally recognized, artful masters of techniques that have not, to date, been fully explained.

It is rightfully assumed that they had a wise, stratified, social organization, hierarchized, based on sound moral principles, according to which common life daily living took place orderly and safely with order and safety.

It is known that they spoke rich languages which could express concepts of maximum abstraction, and contained nuances capable of soundly expressing, directly and metaphorically, the languages of science, philosophy and poetic expressions. All this and more, not easily listed here, is admitted by everyone as obvious and plausible. To summarize, we’ll say without a doubt, that the ancient inhabitants of Mesoamerica were learned men, intellectually and morally able, who knew themselves and the world around them.

This notwithstanding, when considering their view of the world and of themselves, authors almost unanimously judge them to be rudimentary savages whose only concern was that the fertility of the land, due to rainfall, would yield the fruits that sustained them. Under the pretext that they made up farming communities, all their spiritual forces are discarded, as is the totality of their religious metaphysical constructs, now reduced to a primitive physical desire for food, at the core and periphery of their existence.

With a few exceptions, most authors have this inexplicable fallacy in judgment" (Rubén Bonifaz Nuño. 1986)[5]

The brilliant and revealing work of people such as Dr. Carlos Lenkersdorf points out that, due to their colonization, Mexicans have lost access to one of the oldest, and most successful, sources of human wisdom. Lenkersdorf demonstrates that we need to create new relationships with the so-called indigenous peoples and cultures of the twenty-first century.

"This we learned due to the fact that we lived and worked for many years with the Tojolabal Mayans, our contemporaries in Chiapas, who taught us their language and culture, which we learned for a reason that we consider important to explain. We had studied and taught in several countries in Europe and in this continent. We had excellent teachers from whom we learned a great deal, who still command our respect. But we were not taught anything about the original peoples in all these universities...

The Tojolabal accepted us and taught us their language and culture during three weeks. They did so without books, without prepared teachers, for neither was available. In fact our teachers were illiterate...”

>>“You are the first to come amongst us to learn about ourselves. All those who come here want to teach us, as if we knew nothing. They are teachers, doctors, politicians, officials, field workers. Everyone wants to teach us.<<

They added another comment. They realized that we tried to write down what we heard from them. They saw something they had not previously seen: their written language. This observation refuted what others had told them: "your dialect cannot be written due to lack of letters". Both observations emphasized the unbalanced relationship between the dominant society and the indigenous peoples, the Tojolabal, for the case in point. The group remained without writing and was disregarded, because “nothing could be learned from them”. The two comments changed our course. For us, the Tojolabal were teachers and not merely ignorant Indians. They taught us what they knew and we ignored. The classes, in addition, were dialogic; we learned their language and they learned how to write it. The relationship to which the Tojolabal were accustomed, transformed. They became educators, and thankfully, we became learners. A change that had not occurred in 500 years, with a few exceptions… (Lenkersdorf, Carlos. “Aprender a Escuchar” “Learning to Listen”, PyV. Méx. 2008, p. 14). [6]

8.- The fact that recent texts, written by domestic researchers continue to repeat and take as a base for departure, the errors of foreigners and, most importantly, they pretend to delve into our past based on "objects" (archaeological and documentary remnants) and do not venture into the "subjects" (the historical memory of the native peoples and the philosophical-spiritual aspect that sustains them until today, and that is present in a Stele, in a Codex, a polychrome vase, or a piece of contemporary folk art, in a tradition, legend or custom).

“To demonstrate possible inaccuracies of documentary sources, it would suffice to take a look at the descriptions made by the “soldiers” about what they saw. There, a salient misunderstanding can be found, of what was before their eyes. See, for example, their description of the sacred images venerated in the Temple of Tenochtitlan, and compare it with the same images preserved until today. The conclusion will be that there is no similarity between what was written by them and actual reality.

Descriptions made by friars like Sahagún and Durán, suffer the same drawbacks when they collect impressions from the victors, and are even more serious when they recorded what was reported to them by the defeated..."

"Victorious over the debasement and scorn of foreigners, the signs of that spiritual system of illumination that makes up our cities, still rise.

There, urban planning, engineering, architecture, sculpture, metallurgy, painting, all the arts, all sciences, mathematics, astronomy, time measurement, obediently flourished before the enthusiasm of man; self-assured, proud to be the source and path of ascendance to the perfection of life." (Rubén Bonifaz Nuño. 1992)

9.- There is an almost total ignorance of our ancient history. When an ordinary Mexican refers to it, it is usually from a "flat perspective that lacks the depth of time". Indeed, the historical dimension of our indigenous history spans, seven and a half millennia from the onset of agriculture until the capture of Tenochtitlan. It cannot be reduced to only the 196 years that begun with the founding of Tenochtitlan until its destruction and have the Aztecs as the purported great cultural heirs of Toltecáyotl and the Anahuac.

Our ancient history is far deeper, diverse and complex. It has had, formative, climactic and decadent cycles. Many different cultures in time and space have been a part thereof. However, during all this time there has been a philosophical—cultural matrix inextricably joining the peoples of the Anahuac to us, Mexicans of the twenty-first century, in spite of our historical and cultural amnesia- as a continuation of their work and legacy. Only in colonizing minds, is this historical and cultural continuity unfeasible. Colonists have created our fictional but painful cultural orphanage in order to continue our exploitation and the depredation of our natural patrimony.

We urgently need to re-build, re-think and re-invent a history of our own. We must do so without fearing the "sacred cows", the rigid Academy, and the "organic intellectuals". History belongs to those who create it, rather than those who "investigate" it. The history of México must return to the people. It is to be told, and felt, by the people.

But however difficult this task may be, we hold the pieces of the puzzle; it will depend on the sensitivity, creativity and spiritual force of whomever intends to try. Our Old Grandparents, and their legacy of wisdom, are still alive in the depths of the souls and hearts of the children of their children; the Mexicans of today.

 Cem Ānáhuac is a Náhuatl language concept that refers to the continent. Land surrounded by the celestial waters.
 Francisco Javier Clavijero Echegaray (sometimes Francesco Saverio Clavigero) (September 9, 1731 – April 2, 1787 Veracruz, México), was a New Spain Jesuit teacher, scholar and historian. After the expulsion of the Jesuits from Spanish colonies (1767), he went to Italy, where he wrote a valuable work on the pre-Columbian history and civilizations of Mesoamerica and the central Mexican altiplano. He was born in Veracruz (Mexico) of a Spanish father and a Creole mother. His father worked for the Spanish crown, and was transferred with his family from one town to another. Most of the father's posts were to locations with a strong indigenous presence, and because of this Clavijero learned Nahuatl growing up, which would be helpful to him when he became a missionary teacher and historian. The family lived at various times in Teziutlán, Puebla and later in Jamiltepec, in the Mixtec region of Oaxaca.
 Guerrero, José Luís, Flor y Canto del nacimiento de México”. Librería Parroquial de Clavería. México.
 Dr. Enrique Florescano Mayet (San Juan in Coscomatepec, Veracruz; 1937). He is a renowned and prolific Mexican historian. He teaches at the College of Mexico and holds a doctorate degree from the École Pratique des Hautes Études. His research covers practically the entire history of Mexico, of which the most outstanding centers around the Mesoamerican period, and focuses on religious, mythical aspects and on the figure of Quetzalcoatl. He is a member of the Advisory Science Board to the Presidency of the Mexican Republic.
 Rubén Bonifaz Nuño (born 12 November 1923) is a Mexican poet and classical scholar. Born in Córdoba, Veracruz, he studied law at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) from 1934 to 1947. In 1960, he began lecturing in Latin at the UNAM's Faculty of Philosophy and Letters and, in 1970, received a doctoral degree in classical art and culture. He has been a member of the Mexican Academy of Language since 1962 where he was Chairman from 1963 until 1996 when he resigned. He was admitted to the National College in 1972. He was awarded Mexico’s National Prize for Literature and Linguistics in 1974.
 Anthropologist Carlos Lenkersdorf has claimed several linguistic and cultural features of the Tojolabal primarily the language's ergativity, show that they do not give cognitive weight to the distinctions subject/object, active/passive. This interprets as being evidence in favor of the controversial Sapir-Worf hypothesis.
[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]
Categories: Translation subpagesWikisource translationsWorks originally in Spanish

Sunday, July 18, 2021

Bruce Pascoe - Wikipedia

Bruce Pascoe - Wikipedia

Bruce Pascoe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Bruce Pascoe
Born1947 (age 73–74)
Richmond, Victoria, Australia
OccupationWriter
Alma materUniversity of Melbourne (BEd)
GenreAustralian fiction, poetry
SubjectAustralian Indigenous history
Notable worksFog a Dox (2012)
Dark Emu (2014)
Notable awards
List of awards
Spouse? (? – 1982)
Lyn Harwood (1982 – )
Children2[1]

Bruce Pascoe (born 1947) is an Aboriginal Australian writer of literary fictionnon-fictionpoetryessays and children's literature. As well as his own name, Pascoe has written under the pen names Murray Gray and Leopold Glass. Since August 2020, he has been Enterprise Professor in Indigenous Agriculture at the University of Melbourne.

Pascoe is best known for his work Dark Emu: Black Seeds: Agriculture or Accident? (2014), which reexamines colonial accounts of Aboriginal people in Australia and cites evidence of pre-colonial agricultureengineering and building construction by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

Early life and education

Pascoe was born in Richmond, Victoria in 1947.[2] He grew up in a poor working-class family; his father, Alf, was a carpenter, and his mother, Gloria Pascoe, went on to win a gold medal in lawn bowls at the 1980 Arnhem Paralympics.[3][4][5] Pascoe spent his early years on King Island where his father worked at the tungsten mine. His family moved to Mornington, Victoria, when he was 10 years old, and then two years later moved to the Melbourne suburb of Fawkner. He attended the local state school before completing his secondary education at University High School, where his sister had won an academic scholarship. Pascoe went on to attend the University of Melbourne, initially studying commerce but then transferring to Melbourne State College. After graduating with a Bachelor of Education,[6] he was posted to a small township near Shepparton. He later taught at Bairnsdale for nine years.[7]

Career

While on leave from his teaching career, Pascoe bought a 300-hectare (740-acre) mixed farming property and occasionally worked as an abalone fisherman. In his spare time he began writing short stories, poetry and newspaper articles.[7]

In 1982 he moved back to Melbourne and sought to publish a journal of short stories. He came into conflict with existing publishers and instead decided to form his own company, raising A$10,000 in capital with his friend Lorraine Phelan. He ran Pascoe Publishing and Seaglass Books with his wife, Lyn Harwood.[8][2]

From 1982 to 1998 Pascoe edited and published a new quarterly magazine of short fiction, Australian Short Stories, which published all forms of short stories by both established and new writers, including Helen GarnerGillian Mears and Tim Winton.[3][8][2] The first issue came close to selling out its initial print run of 20,000.[7]

The main character in his 1988 novel Fox is a fugitive, searching for his Aboriginal identity and home. The book deals with issues such as Aboriginal deaths in custody, discrimination and land rights, as well as blending Aboriginal traditions with contemporary life and education.[9]

Convincing Ground: Learning to Fall in Love with Your Country (2007), whose title is drawn from the Convincing Ground massacre, examines historical documents and eyewitness accounts of incidents in Australian history and ties them in with the "ongoing debates about identity, dispossession, memory and community". It is described in the publisher's blurb as a book "for all Australians, as an antidote to the great Australian inability to deal respectfully with the nation's constructed Indigenous past".[10][11]

Pascoe featured in the award-winning documentary series which aired on SBS Television in 2008, First Australians,[8] has been Director of Commonwealth Australian Studies project for the Commonwealth Schools Commission,[8] and has worked extensively on preserving the Wathaurong language, producing a dictionary of the language.[2]

Fog a Dox, a story for young adults, won the Prime Minister's Literary Awards in 2013 and was shortlisted for the 2013 WA Premier’s Book Awards (Young Adult category) and the 2013 Deadly Awards (Published Book of the Year category).[12] Judges for the PM's Award commented that "The author's Aboriginality shines through but he wears it lightly...", in a story which incorporates Indigenous cultural knowledge.[13]

Dark Emu (2014)

Dark Emu: Black Seeds: Agriculture or Accident?, first published in 2014, drew on scientific work which challenged the oft-cited claim that pre-colonial Australian Aboriginal peoples were only hunter-gatherers.[14] Pascoe's research of early settler accounts found accounts of grain cultivation, wells, and sophisticated systems of aquaculture.[15][16] The book was well-received. A favourable review of its cultural implications in the academic online magazine The Conversation touched off a debate there about Pascoe's use of his historical sources.[17] A second edition, entitled Dark Emu: Aboriginal Australia and the Birth of Agriculture was published in mid-2018,[18] and a version of the book for younger readers, entitled Young Dark Emu: A Truer History, was published in 2019.[19] The 2019 version was shortlisted for the 2020 Adelaide Festival Awards for Literature in the Children's Literature Award section.[20]

In October 2019 it was announced that a documentary film of Dark Emu would be made for television by Blackfella Films, co-written by Pascoe with Jacob Hickey, directed by Erica Glynn and produced by Darren Dale and Belinda Mravicic.[21]

Later work and other roles

In September 2015, in a collaboration with Poets House in New York, a recording of six First Nations Australia Writers Network members reading their work was presented at a special event, which was recorded. Pascoe was one of the readers, along with Jeanine Leane, Dub LefflerMelissa LucashenkoJared Thomas and Ellen van Neerven.[22]

Pascoe was appointed Enterprise Professor in Indigenous Agriculture at the University of Melbourne in September 2020, in a role "within the School of Agriculture and Food,... designed to build knowledge and understanding of Indigenous agriculture within the Faculty and to grow engagement and research activities in this area".[23][24]

Pascoe is a Country Fire Authority volunteer. He battled the 2019–20 bushfires near Mallacoota.[25] In January 2020, he went to New South Wales to help out there, before returning to Mallacoota. He cancelled his scheduled appearances at a Perth Festival event in February and at the Adelaide Writers' Week in March, to remain in East Gippsland to assess the damage done to his Mallacoota property, and to assist his community in the recovery effort in the aftermath of the bushfires.[26]

Aboriginal identity

For the first part of his life, Pascoe assumed he only had British heritage. In his early thirties, Pascoe started investigating his ancestry, partly as he remembered an uncle having mentioned Aboriginal ancestry. He found Aboriginal ancestors on both sides of his family, including from Tasmania (Palawa),[27] from the Bunurong people of the Kulin nation of Victoria, and the Yuin of southern New South Wales.[28][8] He identified himself as Koori by the age of 40.[3] He acknowledges his Cornish and European colonial ancestry as well as his love of "the broader Australian culture", but says that he feels Aboriginal. He has said "It doesn’t matter about the colour of your skin, it's about how deeply embedded you are in the culture. It's the pulse of my life". He said that his family denied their own Aboriginality for a long time, and it was only when he investigated the "glaring absences" in the family's story that he was drawn into Aboriginal society and culture.[29]

In Convincing Ground (2007), Pascoe wrote about the dangers of "people of broken and distant heritage like me...barging into their rediscovered community expecting to be greeted like the Prodigal Son", saying that those who have grown up without awareness of their Aboriginality cannot have experienced racism, being removed from family or other disadvantages, and cannot "fully understand what it is to be Aboriginal. You've lost contact with your identity and in quite profound areas it can never be reclaimed... As a result of this limited experience you cannot assume authority or the position of a spokesperson". He says that some branches of family trees and public records have often been "pruned of a few branches".[30][31] In this book and in interviews, Pascoe admits that his Aboriginal ancestry is distant, and that he is "more Cornish than Koori".[3]

Columnist Andrew Bolt and the magazine Quadrant have questioned Pascoe's identification as Aboriginal. Following Bolt's breach of the Racial Discrimination Act in 2011 relating to comments about fair-skinned Aboriginal people (upheld in Eatock v Bolt), Pascoe wrote an article in 2012 titled "Andrew Bolt's Disappointment". It was originally published in the Griffith Review[32] (republished in 2019 in Salt: Selected Stories and Essays).[33] In it Pascoe suggested that he and Bolt could "have a yarn" together, without rancour, because "I think it's reasonable for Australia to know if people of pale skin identifying as Aborigines are fair dinkum". He described how and why his Aboriginal ancestry – and that of many others – had been buried,[32] and that the full explanation would be very long and involved.[3]

In December 2019 Indigenous lawyer Josephine Cashman wrote to the Minister for Home AffairsPeter Dutton, alleging that Pascoe had benefited financially from falsely claiming to be Indigenous. Dutton referred the matter to the Australian Federal Police (AFP) on 24 December.[34][35][36] Pascoe said that he found the referral "hurtful", and that he had never met Cashman.[37] On 23 January 2020, the AFP wrote to Cashman saying that the investigation had been closed, as based on their inquiries, no Commonwealth offences had been identified.[38]

In January 2020, Pascoe said that he believed that the allegations that he is not Aboriginal are motivated by wanting to discredit Dark Emu. He had already responded to the Boonwurrung Land and Sea Council's rejection of his connection to the Bunurong, saying that his connection was through the Tasmanian family, not through Central Victorian Bunurong.[39] A few days later, the chairman of the Aboriginal Land Council of TasmaniaMichael Mansell, issued a three-page statement on the issue, saying that he does not believe that Pascoe has Indigenous ancestry, and he should stop claiming he does.[40] However, Mansell acknowledged that some Indigenous leaders including Marcia Langton (Foundation Chair in Australian Indigenous Studies at the University of Melbourne) and Aboriginal elder and Minister for Indigenous AustraliansKen Wyatt supported Pascoe’s Aboriginality based on his claim to community recognition.[41][42]

Awards

Pascoe was nominated as Person of the Year at the National Dreamtime Awards 2018, and was also invited by Yuin elder Max Dulumunmum Harrison to a special cultural ceremony lasting several days.[3][50] In the same year he presented "Mother Earth" for the Eric Rolls Memorial Lecture.[51]

Personal life

In 1982, Pascoe separated from a woman whom he had married after graduating from college.[7] They have a daughter.[52] In the same year, he married Lyn Harwood. They have a son.[52] In 2017, Pascoe and Harwood separated. According to Pascoe, the split was due to his many absences and his late-life mission to pursue farming.[3]

Pascoe lives on a 60-hectare (150-acre) farm near Mallacoota in East Gippsland, on the eastern coast of Victoria.[3] He is also working for his family-run company, Black Duck Foods,[53][54][55] that is aiming to produce the type of Indigenous produce mentioned in Dark Emu on a commercial scale.[56]

Works

The following list is a selection of the 182 items by Pascoe as listed on Austlit as of December 2019:[57]

Pascoe has also produced a language learning CD-ROM, film, and teachers' book and a Wathaurong dictionary for the Wathaurong Aboriginal Co-op, Geelong, Victoria.[2]

He has also written under the names Murray Gray (The Great Australian Novel: At Last it's Here, a 1984 satirical novel[61]) and Leopold Glass (Ribcage: All You Need Is $800,000 – Quickly, a 1999 detective novel[62]).[8]

References

  1. ^ "Open Page with Bruce Pascoe" (no. 413 ed.). Australian Book Review. August 2019. Retrieved 13 January 2019.
  2. Jump up to:a b c d e f "Author profile: Bruce Pascoe"Macquarie Pen Anthology. Retrieved 14 October 2019.
  3. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h Guilliatt, Richard (25 May 2019). "Turning history on its head"The Australian. Weekend Australian Magazine. Retrieved 20 December 2019.
  4. ^ "Gloria: light in the dark / Gloria Pascoe and Bruce Pascoe". National Library of Australia. Retrieved 26 April 2020.
  5. ^ "Family notices"The Herald. 3 July 1952. p. 6. Retrieved 26 April 2020.
  6. ^ "Bruce Pascoe"University of Technology Sydney. Retrieved 18 December 2019.
  7. Jump up to:a b c d Connelly, Patrick (26 March 1983). "A comeback for the short story?"The Canberra Times.
  8. Jump up to:a b c d e f "Bruce Pascoe"Austlit. Retrieved 14 October 2019.
  9. ^ Pascoe, Bruce (1988). Fox [blurb only]. McPhee Gribble/Penguin. ISBN 9780140114089. Retrieved 31 January 2020.
  10. ^ "Convincing Ground : Learning to Fall in Love with Your Country [Publisher's blurb]"AustLit. 2007. Retrieved 18 December 2019.
  11. ^ Pascoe, Bruce (2007). Convincing Ground: Learning to Fall in Love with Your Country [Publisher's blurb]ISBN 9780855755492. Retrieved 18 December 2019.
  12. ^ "Fog a Dox by Bruce Pascoe (Magabala Books)"Magabala. Retrieved 18 December 2019.
  13. ^ "Fog a Dox"Australian Government. Dept of Communications and the Arts. Retrieved 4 January 2020.
  14. ^ "Dark Emu argues against 'Hunter Gatherer' history of Indigenous Australians"ABC Kimberley. 2 April 2014.
  15. ^ Pascoe, Bruce. "Non-fiction"Bruce Pascoe. Archived from the original on 26 April 2019.
  16. ^ Dark Emu: Black Seeds: Agriculture Or Accident?. Magabala Books. 2014. pp. 85–86. ISBN 9781922142436.
  17. ^ "Dark Emu and the blindness of Australian agriculture" by Tony Hughes-D'Aeth, 15 June 2018.
  18. ^ Pascoe, Bruce (1 June 2018). Dark Emu: Aboriginal Australia and the Birth of Agriculture. Magabala Books. ISBN 9781921248016.
  19. ^ Pascoe, Bruce (2019). Young Dark Emu: A Truer HistoryMagabalaISBN 9781925360844. Retrieved 20 December2019.
  20. ^ "Adelaide Festival Awards for Literature"State Library of South Australia. Retrieved 20 December 2019.
  21. ^ "Dark Emu to be adapted as TV documentary"Arts Hub. Publishing. 18 October 2019. Retrieved 20 October 2019.
  22. ^ "First Nations Australia Writers' Network Reading"Poets House. 30 August 2018. Retrieved 21 February 2021.
  23. ^ "Bruce Pascoe appointed Enterprise Professor in Indigenous Agriculture". Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne. 2 September 2020.
  24. ^ "Prof Bruce Pascoe"Find an Expert. University of Melbourne. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
  25. ^ Le Grand, Chip (3 January 2020). "A changed world puts an end to our lazy summer". Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 31 January 2020.
  26. ^ March, Walter (29 January 2020). "Bruce Pascoe withdraws from Adelaide Writers' Week"The Adelaide Review. Retrieved 31 January 2020.
  27. ^ "Talk: 60,000 years of tradition meets the microscopic world"Museum of Applied Arts & Sciences. 2018. Retrieved 20 December 2019.
  28. ^ Pascoe, Bruce (1 February 2016). "Bruce Pascoe on the complex question of Aboriginal agriculture"Australian Broadcasting Corporation (Radio National) (Interview). Conversations with Richard Fidler. Interviewed by Richard Fidler. Retrieved 14 October 2019.
  29. ^ Tan, Monica. "Indigenous writer Bruce Pascoe: 'We need novels that are true to the land'"The Guardian. Books. Retrieved 1 December 2019.
  30. ^ Pascoe, Bruce (2007). Convincing Ground. Aboriginal Studies Press. pp. 119-121. ISBN 978-0-85575-549-2.
  31. ^ Griffiths, Tom (26 November 2019). "Reading Bruce Pascoe"Inside StoryISSN 1837-0497. Retrieved 10 January2020.
  32. Jump up to:a b Pascoe, Bruce (Winter 2012). "Andrew Bolt's disappointment"Griffith Review (36): 164–169. ISSN 1839-2954. Archived from the original on 23 October 2015.
  33. ^ Pascoe, Bruce (2019). Salt: Selected Stories and Essays. Black Inc. pp. 73–82. ISBN 9781760641580.
  34. ^ Latimore, Jack (11 January 2020). "Dutton refers matter of Bruce Pascoe's identity to Federal Police"National Indigenous TelevisionSpecial Broadcasting Service. Retrieved 12 January 2020.
  35. ^ Hunter, Fergus (11 January 2020). "Ken Wyatt defends Indigenous author Bruce Pascoe against attacks over heritage". The Age. Retrieved 12 January 2020.
  36. ^ Morton, Adam (11 January 2020). "Peter Dutton's office referred complaint accusing Bruce Pascoe of falsely claiming to be Indigenous to AFP"The Guardian. Retrieved 12 January 2020.
  37. ^ Humphries, Alexandra (13 January 2020). "Author Bruce Pascoe 'hurt' after Peter Dutton's office refers Aboriginality complaint to AFP"ABC News. Retrieved 13 January 2020.
  38. ^ Hope, Zach (23 January 2020). "AFP drops Bruce Pascoe investigation after Dark Emu author accused of faking Aboriginal heritage"The Age. Retrieved 24 January 2020.
  39. ^ Topsfield, Jewel (18 January 2020). "Bruce Pascoe says Aboriginality queries an attempt to discredit Dark Emu"The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 23 January 2020.
  40. ^ Mansell, Michael (23 January 2020). "Bruce Pascoe Is Not Tasmanian Aboriginal"Tasmanian Times.comArchivedfrom the original on 24 January 2020. Retrieved 24 January 2020.
  41. ^ Denholm, Matthew (23 January 2020). "Bruce Pascoe 'should stop claiming indigenous ancestry'"The Australian. Retrieved 23 January 2020.
  42. ^ Morton, Rick (30 November 2019). "Bolt, Pascoe and the culture wars"The Saturday Paper (281). Retrieved 10 January 2020.
  43. ^ "Guide to the papers of David Foster"UNSW Canberra. Retrieved 17 October 2019.
  44. ^ Lee, Bronwyn. "Prime Minister's Literary Awards 2013"The Conversation. The Conversation. Retrieved 4 January 2020.
  45. ^ "2013 Deadly Awards Winners"The Deadlys. Vibe Australia. Retrieved 4 January 2020.
  46. ^ Rice, Deborah (16 May 2016). "Bruce Pascoe's Dark Emu wins NSW Premier's Literary prize"ABC News. Retrieved 20 May 2019.
  47. ^ Wyndham, Susan (17 May 2016). "Indigenous writers rise to the top of the 2016 NSW Premier's Literary Awards"Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 23 May 2017.
  48. ^ "Australia Council Awards | Australia Council"www.australiacouncil.gov.au. Retrieved 4 March 2019.
  49. ^ "CBCA Book of the Year 2020 winners announced"Books+Publishing. 16 October 2020. Retrieved 16 October 2020.
  50. ^ "Pascoe receives Person of the Year honour at 2018 National Dreamtime Awards"Books+Publishing. 21 November 2018. Retrieved 6 August 2019.
  51. ^ "Mother Earth with Bruce Pascoe"National Library of Australia. 28 November 2018. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  52. Jump up to:a b Warne-Smith, Drew (28 September 2007). "Double Take"Weekend Australian Magazine. Retrieved 13 January2020.
  53. ^ "Turning history on its head"The Weekend Australian. 25 May 2019. Retrieved 28 March 2021.
  54. ^ "Black Duck Foods success journey". First Australians Capital. 1 September 2020. Retrieved 28 March 2021.
  55. ^ "Black Duck Foods Sowing seeds for First Nations food sovereignty". Common Ground. Retrieved 28 March 2021.
  56. ^ Edwards, Astrid (9 August 2019). "Indigenous author challenges Australians on our 'fraudulent' history"Sydney Morning Herald.
  57. ^ "Bruce Pascoe (182 works by)". Retrieved 3 December 2019.
  58. ^ "Review: Dark Emu by Bruce Pascoe". Stumbling through the past. 13 July 2014. Retrieved 3 December 2019.
  59. ^ "'Dark Emu' by Bruce Pascoe". The Resident Judge of Port Phillip. 13 July 2014. Retrieved 3 December 2019.
  60. ^ Kinnane, Steve (November 2019). "Salt: Selected stories and essays by Bruce Pascoe"Australian Book Review (416). Retrieved 3 December 2019.
  61. ^ "Murray Gray"Austlit. Retrieved 18 December 2019.
  62. ^ "Leopold Glass"Austlit. Retrieved 18 December 2019.

Further reading