Saturday, April 20, 2019

Cry Korea by Reginald Thompson | Goodreads



Cry Korea by Reginald Thompson | Goodreads




Want to Read

Rate this book
1 of 5 stars2 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars


Cry Korea

by
Reginald Thompson
3.67 · Rating details · 3 ratings · 0 reviews
From inside the original book sleeve:

Cry Korea is a first hand account which reveals the heart of the Korean tragedy. From the Inchon landing to the fall of Seoul; in the advance across the parallel to the capture of the enemy capital of Pyongyang, and North beyond the Chongchon river, the author followed the forward troops. Sharing many of their hardships; he knew the high hopes of "Home for Christmas", and saw these hopes, and the hopes of peace, disappear in disillusion in the terrible flight from the Chongchon river. In four crucial months the war had been "won" and "lost". When Mr. Thompson arrived, the United Nations were on the old Naktong river line. When he left, they were back on the Naktong. Then came General Ridgeway, and the whole process began again. The story of the 27th Commonwealth Brigade, "The Cinderella Brigade", is one which will not soon be forgotten.

So, as the tide of war, augmented by napalm bombs, phosphorus and rockets, and a tremendous weight of artillery, ebbed and flowed over the whole heart of Korea, both north and south, the civilian tragedy grew to staggering proportions. It is still growing. Tens of thousands, even hundres of thousands, are homeless. Perhaps two million men, women and children, have died. From the old Naktong river line to the Yalu river, Korea has become a refuse heap of humanity, of towns and villages reduced to rubble and ashes, of roads crumbled to dust, of railways smashed, of harvests and homes burned, burned and burned again. On the frozen roads, the frozen rivers and the frozen seas, the author watched the pitiful human tide, month after month, seeking sanctuary which is only to be found in death. Accustomed to tyranny and invasion for a thousand years few of the bewildered and doomed peasants have the remotest idea of political issues. Democracy and communism are equally meaningless. They seek only to survive.

The story is told by a writer, whose grim personal struggles and world-wide adventures over a period of more than twenty-five years, largely among simple peoples, have brought him to humility and understanding. Cry Korea is a piece of faithful reporting, made memorable by the sincerity and dramatic descriptive power, which has invested this writer's world over the last twenty years since Argentine Interlude. Few men have had a wider and more terrible experience of modern warfare in three continents. Mr. Thompson is a trained soldier, earning a commission the "hard way" and serving in the Intelligence Corps from 1940 to 1944 before becoming the War Correspondent of the Sunday Times from the Normandy campaign to the end. (less)

GET A COPY
Kobo
Online Stores ▾
Book Links ▾

Hardcover, First Edition, 303 pages
Published 1951 by MacDonald & Co. Ltd, London

==========



Book Review: Reginald Thompson — Cry Korea
by JENNIFER BARCLAY posted 23 APR 2009 updated 22 FEB 2019
in HISTORY | BOOKS. 5 minute read


As British war veterans gather in Korea to mark the anniversary of the battle of the Imjin River, Jennifer Barclay reviews a recently republished eye-witness account of the early months of the war.

CRY KOREA: The Korean War: A Reporter’s Notebook by Reginald Thompson
Reportage Press, 2009, 352pp


Cry Korea is the most unusual book I’ve read about the Korean War.

While interviewing British veterans of that war, I’m often upbraided for my ignorance when it comes to the literature, but frankly I find it all a bit, well, military. Company A manoeuvred into a central position to outflank the platoon and retreated to Position C where it joined the rearguard whatsit and I’m completely and utterly lost. Like Max Hastings’ weighty tome on the subject, they are simply not for the casual reader.

Reginald Thompson, born 1904, established himself as a war correspondent during World War Two. He enjoyed champagne and thought a lot about the atom bomb. He covered the Korean frontline for the Daily Telegraph for the first four months and this personal account reveals much about the life of a war correspondent in 1950, when the face of war seemed to be changing and when copy didn’t always reach home. More than that, it gives a rare glimpse into a country at the start of half a century of division.

With an immediate style and poetic sensibility, at its best Cry Korea is immensely readable, elegant and compelling, occasionally Hemingway-esque: ‘We had a wash and brush-up aboard, and they gave us a meal in the junior warrant officers’ mess, and it was a good meal.’ An American photographer, seeing he has nothing to read, ‘casually tore his paperbacked book in two pieces and gave one to me. It was the last half of a collection of de Maupassant’s short stories, and I doubt whether there could be anything more valuable to a journalist than to read de Maupassant at such a time.’

Thompson is never self-important, and lets you in on secrets. Finding himself in a United Nations ship in Incheon within 24 hours of the landing by United States marines, he is delighted that he’ll get scoop coverage; he wakes at three in the morning to the ringing of a telephone, forgets he’s in a top bunk and takes a dive onto the concrete floor.

He paints a vivid picture of the wardroom ‘overcrowded with correspondents, typewriters clacking away on knees and every available table corner, mattresses on the floor.’ But their copy took second place to operational stuff, so it stacked up until out of date. Meanwhile, the news agency chiefs aboard as guests of General MacArthur had telephones direct to Tokyo.Reginald Thompson

Unlike most of the servicemen who went to Korea aged 19, 20 and 21, Thompson was already a man of some experience, having lived and worked in South America and Australia before his second world war service in Europe. He is openly contemptuous of the American soldiers, ‘trigger happy’ with their automatic weapons, ‘gook-getters’ many of them, who never saw the Koreans as people. His distaste borders on prim when he talks of the Americans shovelling food in their mouths, never cleaning their boots, swearing, seldom shaving. As for their leaders, he believes they mishandle every situation, especially their slow advance through a barely-defended Seoul, destroying everything as they go.

Most of all, his abhorrence for the new form of warfare is deep and unmistakable. Thompson has seen too much by 1950 of the way twentieth century war desolates whole communities facelessly, inflicting ‘veritable mass productions of death’, leaving masses of people to trudge along roadsides with the bundles that are all that remain of their lives.

The Korean countryside clearly delights him, with its lovely terraced hillsides, ‘the brilliant scarlet of the ripe pimentos in the midst of the green and grey foliage… the tiles of the roofs upcurled at eaves and corners like the toes of oriental slippers… the women wore bright colours, crimson and the pale pink of water melon flesh, and vivid emerald green…’ He watches villages where peasants work ‘harvesting the tall ripe sorghum, unmindful of the war which was about to envelop them.’

The next day, an infantry division had moved over this land, and ‘the bright colours were gone from field and female under the dust pall.’ The advance continued slowly, ‘calling for air and artillery support to break every road block and to blast every building…out of existence.’ Prisoners were taken, stripped naked, marched down roadsides… As Seoul lay burning, the saving of the Korean people took on a terrible and bitter flavour. Yet the people ran to grasp their hands, tears streaming down their faces, sobbing thanks to the liberators.

This is powerful reading.General MacArthur’s statue at Incheon

Thompson, who had quickly grown to despise General MacArthur for his arrogant and relentless control of the news, is contemptuous of his victory speech full of religious rhetoric: ‘One correspondent cabled the lot including the Lord’s Prayer in full at 1s.1.5d. a word.’

It was estimated that fifty thousand civilians had died by the time the UN troops took Seoul. Meanwhile, the North Korean army escaped into the hills. ‘The trap had closed, and it was empty.’ From there the United Nations troops would continue into North Korea, until the enemy reappeared in an unrecognizable form, swelled by the Chinese who would prolong the war for two more years.

‘We did not know then that this was but a foretaste, a first instalment, of the horrible price the people of Korea would presently be called upon to pay. We thought it was over — and it had only just begun.’

From then until he is recalled only four months into the war, Thompson spends much effort trying to cadge a lift in dodgy jeeps to follow the action, and in the second half the book does become baggy and meandering, perhaps overly personal.

But it is worth the read for those details that you get nowhere else. He describes an abandoned hut, where bowls of rice have been laid out, and the ‘huge Korean earthenware storage jars, almost large enough to house the forty thieves’, the tatami mats and the furniture, ‘cheaply made, but with a certain taste and refinement’. And on a bridge, finding notices soliciting custom for after the war: ‘You are crossing the river by courtesy of – Coy Engineers’.

The North Koreans, ‘certainly as politically unconscious as their South Korean brothers’, simply wanted to get on with their lives. He reflected that if the United Nations truly wanted to protect and guide South Korea towards a democracy, this must imply at least a long occupation: “I could not believe in American ‘democracy’, and I could not believe that all her missionary zeal to propagate a ‘way of life’ to which she herself aspires but dimly could result in anything but disaster for the ‘saved’”. General Douglas MacArthur’s cries of ‘home for Christmas’ not only aroused impossible hopes in his men but alarmed him: ‘Seldom in the history of warfare can any appreciation of a situation have been more wrong’.

Outspoken and full of observations with import still today, Cry Korea is a must-read for anyone interested in war reporting and in the realities of the Korean conflict in which 60,000 British servicemen and women served, and helps us to comprehend the little-understood situation in Korea. Reportage Press have done a public service by making available again this rare and valuable account.

Links:
Buy Cry Korea at Amazon.co.uk or Amazon.com

Jennifer Barclay is author of Meeting Mr Kim: Or How I Went to Korea and Learned to Love Kimchi

Book Review: Birth Mothers in South Korea – InterCountry Adoptee Voices (ICAV)



Book Review: Birth Mothers in South Korea – InterCountry Adoptee Voices (ICAV)



NOVEMBER 8, 2016 BY LYNELLELONG
Book Review: Birth Mothers in South Korea




Released today, 8 November 2016, at Palgrave-MacMillan

https://www.amazon.com/Birth-Mothers-Transnational-Adoption-Practice/dp/1137538511


Gut wrenching to learn of our biological mothers’ life experiences!

This book is a must read for those who think critically about intercountry adoption. It is written by an academic, Hosu Kim, who is herself Korean born and moved to the USA in the 1990s. She is a sociologist and regards herself as a transnational feminist scholar. She provides amazing insight into the history of South Korean intercountry adoption and most importantly, focuses on experiences of South Korean mothers who lost their children to intercountry adoption.

As an intercountry adoptee myself, raised in Australia and adopted out of the Vietnam War, I have always advocated for empowering and including the voices of our original families to ensure a more balanced perspective of intercountry adoption. ICAV has been instrumental in helping to bring to the forefront the voices and experiences of intercountry adoptees. Intercountry adoptees have continued to evolve, connect, and collaborate, speaking loudly throughout the world about our experiences. In comparison, our mothers and fathers are still invisible and mostly not considered when it comes to intercountry adoption policy and decision making at all levels.

I hope this book, being the first of its kind to academically research the experiences of a number of South Korean mothers, will help the world take steps for inclusion of their voices and experiences!
About the Book

Kim coins the term “virtual mothering” to describe the process by which South Korean mothers get separated from their children for intercountry adoption via maternity homes and then reconnected again with their child via imaginary or real processes such as TV shows, internet blogs, and oral history collections. Her book demonstrates how these South Korean women begin as mothers in the traditional sense but it is not a fixed identity based purely on birthing. Instead, mothering as a South Korean woman who has given up her child via intercountry adoption is a transient and transformative process.

To help us better understand the concept of virtual mothering she cites phrases from mothers such as:


“I am a mother but not a mother”,

“I abandoned my baby but I really didn’t, I didn’t abandon my baby but I might as well have”,

“I was alive but it cannot really be called living”.

Early chapters explore the historical emergence of intercountry adoption within the context of post war South Korea. Often we assume mothers relinquish in intercountry adoption contexts because of poverty but Kim gives you the in depth view of what happened in South Korea. She demonstrates the direct links between war, war orphan crisis, the need for emergency relief programs provided by foreign aid organisations (usually religious NGOs) that turned into permanent child welfare institutions. The emergence of these NGOs as maternity homes and then adoption agencies subsequently allow the South Korean government to avoid the responsibility of developing social welfare infrastructure. In turning a blind eye to taking responsibility, coupled with long held patriarchal beliefs and traditions, the South Korean government chooses to sacrifice mothers and children at the expense of the country’s first priorities – national security and economic development.



Upon reading this book, I gained insight and answers to my long pondered question of why South Korea remains the largest exporter of children yet have a strong economic situation. A strong economy was achieved at the expense of the children exported enmasse and the mothers who were never given any other choice! As an intercountry adoptee, this injustice makes me angry! I often hear other intercountry adoptees wrestling with the same sense of abandonment, not from our mothers, but from our countries who choose to give away their responsibility of us.

The chapter on the role of televised searching/reunion narratives was insightful and fitted with what I’ve also learned from adoptees’ perspectives. The overt orchestrated reunions to “portray the cultural belief that transnational adoption offers a better life” via the American Dream. The “idealisation that adoptive parents and life in the west” is better. The lack of empowerment for the parties involved. The sensationalised first meeting that does little to be real about the complexities. The sadness that encompass adoptees and mothers post reunion. All of these realities struck me head on and highlighted the glibness of such televised search shows!

Kim correctly states television shows “linearise the loss of time .. flatten the complexities of loss”. The harshness of the biological mothers realities post reunion is something I see mirrored in the lives of intercountry adoptees .. the almost impossibility of being able to build any meaningful relationships due to “language, culture, finances, bureaucratic barriers and differences” .

Kim’s following statements powerfully bring home the reality of our mother’s truths:


“it is therefore thru reuniting with her child that the birth mother finally sees and feels the metaphorical death of her child”..

“it is the acknowledgement of the magnitude and irretrievability of these losses”

” .. reunion was both a final realisation, an acknowledgement of loss of time, loss of child, and loss of their own mothering”.

I felt crushed by the weight of South Korean mother’s experiences! It was as heavy as I had sensed in my years of being connected with intercountry adoptees and from the realities I gained from our latest paper on Search & Reunion: Impacts & Outcomes. Adoptees find out the truth of their relinquishment and adoption when they reunite. As Kim highlights from these mother’s experiences, it’s often not as the adoption and television industry try to make us believe.

Kim adequately used the phrase:


“the social death of birth mothers is not merely a state of invisibility, but rather the result of violent processes involving .. domination and humiliation that devalues the lives of these women”.



Once we open ourselves to our mother’s realities, one can’t help but judge the adoption industry harshly for its dehumanising consequences to mother and child. Our mothers really had no choices and their value was crushed from the beginning. So too, it is reflected for adoptees whereby we continue to have little legal, financial, ethical rights or assistance when we experience an intercountry adoption that has not been in our interests e.g. outright or suspected trafficking, deportation, rehoming, and abuse/death at the hands of unsuitable adoptive parents.

Kim wrote about mother’s who inevitably end up “estranged from their own lives”. This same “severance from self” is one of the fundamental issues many adoptees also struggle with. Our mother’s accounts cannot be ignored or denied!


“Her loss severs her from her past and seeps into her present wherein her feelings, needs, and desires become estranged from her; through this estrangement, she becomes cut-off from her own future”.

Intercountry adoption cannot be undertaken without acknowledging the lifelong impacts on our mothers who have been separated from us, their child. Kim challenges everyone to recognise the losses our mothers suffered and the processes and means by which their lives are rendered invisible and devalued. This book asks us to be engaged and affected by what has happened in the name of economic development.

My special thanks to Hanna Johannson who connected me to Hosu Kim and her research!

You can also read related research on the experiences of Ethiopian mothers separated via intercountry adoption by Rebecca Demissie and South Indian mothers who relinquish for adoption by Pien Bos.

Note: I chose to use the term biological or justmother as opposed to “birth” mothers out of respect for the countless mothers who feel offended by the adoption industry terminology. So too, I use the term intercountry adoption as opposed to “transnational adoption” due to legal terminology derived from the 1993 Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption

Share this:

Twitter
Facebook
More



Like this:TAGSADOPTING OVERSEAS, ADOPTION RESEARCH, BIOLOGICAL MOTHERS EXPERIENCE OF ADOPTION, BIRTH MOTHERS OF SOUTH KOREA, INTERCOUNTRY ADOPTION, INTERNATIONAL ADOPTION FROM KOREA, KOREAN ADOPTIONS, MOTHERS OF LOSS, TRANSNATIONAL ADOPTION, VIRTUAL MOTHERING

One Reply to “Book Review: Birth Mothers in South Korea”

Jenny Pickles
NOVEMBER 8, 2016 AT 09:03


Lynelle many thanks for this info – its so frustrating that the original families are forgotten/invisible. So much focuses on western desires and that it is considered that children adopted from overseas have a better chance in life – meaning perhaps more educational and financial opportunity.

I can’t know what its like and can only listen to “your voices”, and I combine that I suppose with my own experience of losing my son to adoption in the UK, being totally discounted in that process. I’m glad that the UK is calling for an inquiry and a program is to be televised there tomorrow night about the half million women who lost babes to adoption in the 30 years postwar.

I have a book which you may have read by Elizabeth Kim – Ten Thousand Sorrows, such a sad story. I bought it many years ago prior to Evelyn Robinson’s efforts in S Korea.

Hope to see you at the next COAPC meeting.

Cheers

I am an adoptee from Eastern Social Welfare Society

I am an adoptee from Eastern Social Welfare Society



INTERCOUNTRYADOPTEEVOICES.COM
Lynelle shares on why we should be rightfully angry about the loses in intercountry adoption.
Comments
  • Minty Ryan smh

    When I read articles like this, this is what I think:See more
    • Lynelle Long Minty Ryan I’m intrigued as to why u think this is about a “pity pot” .. u don’t have KADs who have been deported or don’t have citizenship? Or u think it’s ok that they don’t? Or are u angry to read about valid things in adoption that trigger ur anger? There’s nothing wrong with anger .. it’s a valid emotion.
    • Minty Ryan I know of zero adoptees that were deported from the USA or have problems with citizenship. If proper procedures had been followed to ensure they attained naturalization after adoption then it wouldn't be an issue. What kind of idiot screws that up?
    • Lynelle Long Minty Ryan lots of adoptive families screwed that up .. try reading this paper it shows u 14 Intercountry adoptees who have no citizenship thru no fault of their own!
      https://intercountryadopteevoices.com/.../citizenship.../
      Citizenship should be guaranteed in Intercountry Adoption
      INTERCOUNTRYADOPTEEVOICES.COM
      Citizenship should be guaranteed in Intercountry Adoption
      Citizenship should be guaranteed in Intercountry Adoption
    • Lynelle Long And unlike what u think, instead of sitting here in my pity pot, I’ve been actively helping my fellow adoptees fight for their right to citizenship .. https://intercountryadopteevoices.com/.../us-government.../
      US Government Meetings
      INTERCOUNTRYADOPTEEVOICES.COM
      US Government Meetings
      US Government Meetings
    • Minty Ryan I don't feel bad for them one bit. If you apply for citizenship in another country there are clearly defined procedures one must take to become a citizen of said country. If the procedures weren't followed, that's the adoptive family's responsibility. Things don't magically happen because we want them to. You have to put in the effort to make sure things are taken care of properly.
    • Lynelle Long Yep we have adoptees like u thru out the world sadly ..
    • Minty Ryan "I hate that our original identities are ignored and get obliterated as if they don’t matter!"

      "I hate that we lose our birth culture, language, religion, heritage, customs, kin, community and country."

      "I hate that I had to endure racism and isolation in my community whilst growing up as a child."

      The reality is what it is. You can let it get you down or you can move your life in a positive direction. A few years ago one of my very good friends ran into a situation where he was jobless and nearly broke and homeless. I sat him down and explained to him that yes, his situation sucked. However, he worked his ass off for a year straight, found a good job and now travels around the world. He could have just sat around crying but he motived himself to take control of his life and move it in a positive direction. If you get deported, tough shit. Deal with it. make the best of the situation and move on.
    • Minty Ryan Lynelle Long I'm a high school drop out. I dealt with the cultural isolation and racism when I was younger. It could have gotten me down, but I made the conscious decision to make my life better. When I see middle class people crying about first world problems with all of their limbs intact and in general good health with their basic life needs met, it makes me sick to my stomach. There are people in way worse situations than you could ever imagine and they find a way to make the best of it.
    • Lynelle Long very pragmatic approach .. anyway nice chatting .. wishing u well but just remember some adoptees like validation as well as pragmatism and clearly u don’t know me or follow my blogs because I get the sense u have no idea what we do at ICAV ..


===========

https://intercountryadopteevoices.com/2018/11/15/what-adoptees-lose-in-adoption/?fbclid=IwAR1li_bnBRFsY-PmyDI9JN3OgtSn0xgwCmjVfSfok5M7_Gz97fgswPm6ZLI


NOVEMBER 15, 2018 BY LYNELLELONG
What Adoptees Lose in Intercountry Adoption




I normally tiptoe around adoption and never say the A word because people just don’t respond well to “adoptee anger“. But during the month of November, I feel it is appropriate to air my feelings on what I have anger about, in intercountry adoption.

I hate that our original identities are ignored and get obliterated as if they don’t matter! I’ve never seen my identity papers because they got “lost” in transit and no-one in government at my adoptive country end, nor my adoptive family, thought to go to the ends of the earth to locate them. Perhaps they thought it wouldn’t matter because I was given a “new” life and family – and that’s all I should ever need?!

I hate that we lose our birth culture, language, religion, heritage, customs, kin, community and country. I hate that these important facets of our identity are ignored and denied. As if they don’t matter because what I gained materially from my adoptive country is assumed to make up for all the losses?!

I hate that I had to endure racism and isolation in my community whilst growing up as a child. The shame of looking non-white, the inner hatred I developed as a result because I didn’t see myself mirrored anywhere. The phrase from my adoptive family, “We love you as one of us” showed how little they understood the impacts of intercountry adoption. They couldn’t recognise my journey was any different to theirs nor did they understand the profound impact this would have on me.

I hate that people assume all adoptive homes are awesome and when we get placed in not-so-positive adoptive homes, no-one checks on us, no-one stands up for us, often our story is not believed and/or invalidated, and no-one gives us a safe place to be nurtured, respected, or cared for. As a child I felt so vulnerable and alone. It was a terrible overwhelming feeling that left me in fight or flight responses for years, with scars to wear for the rest of my life.

I hate that we live in an age where a Government apology seems to be the latest fashion accessory but yet for those adopted via illegal or questionable means, we intercountry adoptees will never get closure. A true apology would mean firstly acknowledging the wrong, then a lifelong commitment to making amends including providing financial renumeration to reflect the pain we carry forever, along with the supports required to help us restore our mental well being; and lastly to make the necessary changes to never repeat the same mistakes again.

I hate that some of my adoptee friends adopted to the USA are living a gutted life because they have been deported back to their country of birth like common commodities, shipped in and out with ease, being treated as though they are of no real value and certainly with no choice. In the majority of cases, they were placed in adoptive homes that were very damaging and their lives spiralled out of control. Isn’t adoption meant to be about “permanency“?! This week in the news headlines, an intercountry adoptee in Australia is to be deported back to the Cook Islands. It is immoral and unethical to adopt a child from one country to another when it suits, through no choice of their own, and then be sent back to birth country because they fail to live up to being an adoption success story!

I hate that thousands of my intercountry adoptee friends in the USA are living in fear everyday because they are still not given automatic citizenship. They often have no social security and cannot leave the country for fear of being picked up by immigration officials. Isn’t adoption meant to provide a forever family … and permanency in a home and country?!

I feel this anger today because it is November and around the world, many use this month to celebrateadoption and promote awareness. For me, I don’t celebrate these aspects of adoption, they make me rightfully angry and more so, when I see my experience replicated in the lives of many around the world.


At ICAV, we believe in promoting awareness of the impacts of intercountry adoption ALL year round, not just in November.

I hope after reading this, you will all also be rightfully angry at the things intercountry adoptees LOSEbecause of our adoption.

My goal is to encourage adoptees to turn that rightful anger into an appropriate energy:
to educate the wider community and enhance a deeper understanding of the complexities involved in intercountry adoption;
to push for the much needed social, political, legal, and economic changes that cause inequality and leave many of our families with little choice;
to help prevent adoption where necessary by supporting family reunification initiatives and advocating for this in our birth countries;
and if adoption has to be the last resort, to help improve the way we conduct intercountry adoption such as changing it from our plenary system to simple adoptions; and supporting all triad members throughout the lifelong journey.

I also acknowledge there are many other less scarey emotions and thoughts we can talk about in intercountry adoption, but at ICAV, I like to raise awareness about the issues that don’t normally get aired.

There are plenty who speak of the positives in adoption … but not many who openly share the not-so-positive aspects. In speaking out, I aim to help balance out the discussions in intercountry and transracial adoption.



Share this:

Twitter
Facebook
More



Like this:TAGSA HOME FOR EVERY CHILD, ADOPTEES, ADOPTION, ADOPTION AND PERMANENCY, ADOPTION AWARENESS MONTH, ADOPTION EXPERIENCE, AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INTERCOUNTRY ADOPTION, DEPORTATION, DEPORTED ADOPTEES, FOREVER FAMILY, INTERCOUNTRY ADOPTION, INTERNATIONAL ADOPTION, MILLIONS OF ORPHANS, NATIONAL ADOPTION AWARENESS, RIGHTS OF THE CHILD, TRANSRACIAL ADOPTION, US OFFICE OF CHILDREN'S ISSUES, US STATE DEPARTMENT, WHAT ADOPTEES LOSE IN ADOPTION

One Reply to “What Adoptees Lose in Intercountry Adoption”

Jenny pickles
NOVEMBER 15, 2018 AT 19:17


Well said Lynelle, as always. Keep up the good work, Jenny Pickles
Loading...

Reply

Leave a Reply