Tuesday, January 13, 2026

The True Flag: Theodore Roosevelt, Mark Twain, and the Birth of American Empire eBook : Kinzer, Stephen: Amazon.com.au: Kindle Store

The True Flag: Theodore Roosevelt, Mark Twain, and the Birth of American Empire: Kinzer, Stephen

: Amazon.com.au: Kindle Store

Kindle
$16.40
Available instantly
Audiobook
$14.95Available instantly






Read sample


Audible sample


The public debate over American interventionism at the dawn of the 20th century is vividly brought to life in this "engaging, well-focused history" (Kirkus, starred review).

Should the United States use its military to dominate foreign lands? It's a perennial question that first raised more than a century ago during the Spanish American War. The country's political and intellectual leaders took sides in an argument that would shape American policy and identity through the 20th century and beyond.

Theodore Roosevelt, Henry Cabot Lodge, and William Randolph Hearst pushed for imperial expansion; Mark Twain, Booker T. Washington, and Andrew Carnegie preached restraint. Not since the nation's founding had so many brilliant Americans debated a question so fraught with meaning for all humanity.

As Stephen Kinzer demonstrates in The True Flag, their eloquent discourse is as relevant today as it was then. Because every argument over America's role in the world grows from this one.
Read less



Print length

432 pages
Language

English



Product description

Review


"One could not ask for a timelier argument...Kinzer is right: the first debate over American empire at the end of the nineteenth century speaks to our own time."--The New York Review of Books

"A well-researched account, which also gestures toward subsequent U.S. interventions"--The New Yorker

"lively and very readable reconstruction of one of American history's most consequential debates....What's striking now is how much this century-old debate mirrors contemporary issues and positions"--Dallas
Morning News

"Important and lucid...Kinzer is an incisive historian of American foreign policy."--Christian Science Monitor

"[A] gripping narrative . . . Kinzer ably conveys the passion and ferment of this brief period, situating this grand debate in the context of U.S. foreign policy history and convincingly arguing that the imperial/anti-imperial dichotomy remains a dominant feature of the American psyche." --Publishers Weekly (starred review)

"In this engaging, well-focused history...Kinzer astutely brings the debate [over American imperialism] from the turn of the century to the present. A tremendously elucidating book that should be required reading for civics courses."--Kirkus Reviews (starred review)

"This straight-forward treatment of America's struggle to define its international posture is essential for readers at all levels as we continue this debate and wonder, 'Why don't they like us?'"--Library Journal (starred review)

"Stephen Kinzer's The True Flag is a marvelous and timely look at the rise of American imperialism at the turn of the twentieth century. All the big power players of the era - Theodore Roosevelt and Mark Twain among them - are analyzed cogently as intellectuals of great merit. An outstanding book!"
--Douglas Brinkley, author of Rightful Heritage: Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Land of America and professor of history, Rice University

"Even in the pages of a novel, it would be impossible to find more extraordinary characters than Theodore Roosevelt and Mark Twain. That these two men locked horns over one of the most fundamental issues facing a young nation is a stunning turn of events, one that Stephen Kinzer, through meticulous research and masterful writing, has turned into a fascinating, fast-paced narrative."
--Candice Millard, author of The River of Doubt, Destiny of the Republic, and Hero of the Empire

"At a moment when Americans are hotly debating their country's role in the world, Stephen Kinzer takes us back to the origins of the modern debate. His account of the battle between imperialists and anti-imperialists at the end of the nineteenth century is riveting, uplifting, dismaying--and as timely as can be."
--H. W. Brands, professor of history at the University of Texas at Austin and author of The General vs. the President: MacArthur and Truman at the Brink of Nuclear War

"In The True Flag, Stephen Kinzer gives us much more than the story of the birth of American dominion. He shows why we Americans were attracted to empire, how we have nurtured it to maturity, and what our choices are now. I thank him for helping me better understand how America acts in the world today."
--James Bradley, author of Flags of Our Fathers, The Imperial Cruise, and The China Mirage

"Stephen Kinzer's lively and incisive history takes us back more than a century to a fateful turning point: the moment when the United States first assumed the right to overthrow or build up regimes in distant parts of the globe. I hope American leaders will read this book and think long and hard about the warning it sounds." --Adam Hochschild, author of Spain in Our Hearts and King Leopold's Ghost
About the Author
STEPHEN KINZER is the author of The Brothers, Reset, Overthrow,All the Shah’s Men, and other books. An award-winning foreign correspondent, he served as Latin America correspondent for the Boston Globe and as the New York Times bureau chief in Nicaragua, Germany, and Turkey. He is a senior fellow at the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs at Brown University and writes a column on world affairs for the Boston Globe. He lives in Boston.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B01HW6Z3L0
Publisher ‏ : ‎ Henry Holt and Co.
Accessibility ‏ : ‎ Learn more
Publication date ‏ : ‎ 24 January 2017
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 24.0 MB
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 432 pages
ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1627792172
==

From Australia


Helpful


yshoraka


5.0 out of 5 stars Very informativeReviewed in Australia on 5 January 2018
Format: KindleVerified Purchase
I found this book very informative. As people throughout should and can affect the policies of their government, this book is a must-read for everyone. Thereby, I highly recommend it.



HelpfulReport

From other countries

Amazon Customer

5.0 out of 5 stars History they don’t teach in schoolReviewed in the United States on 18 December 2025
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
Great read. Great author. Reads like a novel but Learned so much important history that I was never taught in school. I was so unclear about the era of the Spanish American War. You will be surprised. Another shameful blemish on US history.
Report


Sherri Cianca

5.0 out of 5 stars Every American Should KnowReviewed in Canada on 12 September 2023
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
If a country were a person, the US would be diagnosed as having a dissociative identity disorder. In this book Stephen Kinzer documents America's two conflicting personalities, one driven by capitalistic greed and love of war, the other by peace and love for humanities well being. The question remains "Can a nation so conceived, and so divided, long endure?"
Report


Amber Smithwhite

5.0 out of 5 stars Informative Historical perspective of USAReviewed in the United Kingdom on 31 May 2022
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
Mark Twain, Samuel Clements, is one of my favourite writers so I enjoyed reading about his political viewpoint. Didn't know much about Teddy Roosevelt so was an interesting book for many people to get an insight to the American attitude to 'ruling' the world and acting as though they are the only country that counts on this planet.
Report


Kerry Timmins

5.0 out of 5 stars the train is funny and cleverReviewed in Germany on 22 July 2019
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
Good stories
Report


Cliente Amazon

5.0 out of 5 stars Luis de VelascoReviewed in Spain on 23 March 2017
Format: KindleVerified Purchase
Excelente libro.Ahora con razón se habla de las mentiras de Trump.Antecedente:Teddy Roosevelt y compinches imperialistas.Trump y otros presidentes EEUU alumnos distinguidos.
Report
Translate review to English


D.

5.0 out of 5 stars arrived in excellent conditionReviewed in Canada on 23 August 2020
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
enjoyed the read
Report


Joel Marks

4.0 out of 5 stars An interesting and timely history of the U.S.'s debut as a world powerReviewed in the United States on 24 March 2017
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
I am very glad to have read this book, even though it is written in a way that swings between pedestrian and sensationalist. There is no denying that Kinzer brings to the reader's attention an exceedingly interesting and important episode of U.S. history, about which most of us, I imagine, had not an inkling. I for one had not realized that a specific event (or set of events) over a century ago, and occurring in the space of just a couple of years, decided our fate as a world power.

In "The True Flag" we learn that, at the turn of the Twentieth Century, there was a fierce public debate about whether the U.S. should be involved militarily in international affairs only as a liberator or as a conqueror -- as an embodiment of the idea that all people are entitled to be self-governing, or as the colonizer of an empire. Various American idealists rallied to the former conception, while mercantile and "religious" interests defended the latter.

What makes this debate so interesting is that the "bad guys" really did have some persuasive arguments. They pointed out, first of all, that the supposed American ideal of self-governance completely ignores our (then very recent) history of snatching other people's territory in the creation of the country. They also argued that the people of other lands were not (today we would say "might not be") prepared to self-govern in an effective way. Finally, and no doubt the main engine of their motives, they argued that, with so many European countries grabbing colonies all over the world, if we didn't take what we could get, we would miss our chance to acquire economically and strategically important markets and bases of operation.

Meanwhile the anti-imperialists also offered a mix of high-sounding and pragmatic arguments. Aside from wanting the U.S. to stand out as a unique bastion of liberty for all the world, they also predicted that imperialist adventures would embroil us in endless strife and cause, rather than alleviate, humanitarian disasters.

The imperialists won the debate in practical terms, setting us on the course we follow to this day (albeit in modified form), but the anti-imperialists' predictions proved painfully on the mark, both in the short and long terms. Particularly our (mis)adventure in the Philippines was every bit the forerunner of the Vietnam debacle my generation thought was so unique. Overall this book (and its story) leaves one -- or at least an idealist like myself -- lamenting the lost opportunity the U.S. had to be truly unique on the world stage, rather than just another bullying power. Reading it coincides, also lamentably, with a different but related kind of disillusionment with this country due to the election of a demagogue as President.

By the way, the elevation of Mark Twain to shared top billing in the subtitle (and cover illustration) is misleading. Twain does not enter Kinzer's story with any significance until more than two thirds of the way through the book (page 178). Meanwhile, I would definitely have appreciated more in-depth background on the other principal anti-imperialists, such as Andrew Carnegie, Booker T. Washington, William Jennings Bryan, Carl Schurz, and George Frisbie Hoar. Again, I would not have known about their roles in this dramatic story without Kinzer's book, but the book treats them largely as characters who walk on stage for the imperialism debate, leaving us curious about just who these people were in their totality. The Imperialists get better coverage.

23 people found this helpfulReport


Thomas A. Regelski

3.0 out of 5 stars Of interest to those who don't know much about the ...Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 8 June 2017
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
Of interest to those who don't know much about the time period in question, but there's hardly any info (and, then, not until the ending chapters) about Twain's role in the politics of the time.

One person found this helpfulReport
==

From other countries

cassim bakharia

5.0 out of 5 stars Five StarsReviewed in the United Kingdom on 30 May 2018
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
Well Received - Great Item - Prompt Delivery - Thank You
Report


Pbiker

5.0 out of 5 stars One of the debates that will turn the USA around for all time!Reviewed in the United States on 17 March 2017
Format: KindleVerified Purchase
I consider myself to be very knowledgeable about US History. In fact I have read at least 10 books about TR. It is fair to say that I have been at least a fan, but more likely I/d describe myself as a Teddy devotee. This book showing the annexation of Cuba, Porto Rico (as the Senate called it) and the Phillipines reads like a Clive Cussler novel. The speeches made for the Imperialist forces versus the anti-imperialists was a mighty clash of philosophies. Roosevelt, Lodge, McKinley former Pres.Garfield wanted America to utilize it's Manifest Destiny. Samuel Gompers, Booker T. Washington Andrew Carnegie (who offered to pay the millions that the US was going to pay Spain for these outposts with the only condition was free elections by the Native population.). The there is the almost bizarre split-personality of William Jennings Bryan.He had the ability to sway the treaty ratification in the Senate. In a dramatic switch he announced that the US would be doing this ONLY until the country was "stabilized" then free elections would happen The treaty passed by one vote. Amazingly Bryan had a 2nd chance to defeat the annexation if only he would not raise "Free Silver" in his soon-to-come next presidential election. Carnegie was willing to pump millions into his campaign. McKinley would lose. Teddy Roosevelt would NOT be the VP of the USA. But Bryan could not let go of his "Cross of Gold" fanaticism. His omen dried up. McKinley, as you know, lost, was assassinated and Roosevelt, the true jingoist became the President who adopted the American empire climb into the superpower line-up. Fascinating Book. I left out one of the foremost anti-imperialists. Mark Twain, who once said, "God created war so that Americans could learn Geography!"

33 people found this helpfulReport


Jerome Brown

5.0 out of 5 stars The Author always does a great job !Reviewed in the United States on 10 June 2025
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
It’s politics and culture to a detailed degree.
Report


Katherine Cameron

5.0 out of 5 stars LONG BEFORE DONALD TRUMP....Reviewed in the United States on 18 April 2017
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
Every country has a "before and after" narrative - a critical turning point. For the USA, we frequently cite the Civil War or WWII. At these junctions, we had a choice, took a particular path, and changed the country profoundly. These were defining moments.

The True Flag pinpoints an entirely different junction - mid-way between the Civil War and WWII, at the turn of the 20th Century. This is the time when the entire country debated whether or not to become an imperialist power. The pawns in the game were Cuba, Puerto Rico and other Caribbean Islands, Hawaii, and the Philippines. The US successfully fought Spain to "free" these territories, but then had second thoughts.

Twain, Carnegie, and Hearst, championed self-governance for these far-flung lands, outside our existing borders. Teddy Roosevelt and Henry Cabot Lodge were on the other side, arguing for the US to become a strong world power. They persuaded President Mckinley. The True Flag focuses on the very short period of time during which this debate was engaged, and fatefully resolved.

Every bad thing you ever heard about the US war in the Philippines comes alive on these pages, and things you never heard. Ditto Cuba. The bitter surprise is that the debate came so close. On several occasions, the anti-imperialists lost by a singe vote. The whole country threw itself into this agonizing debate, much as it is doing now, with Trump. Digest this sad story, and a whole heck of a lot of our current political and international situations will suddenly make more sense. Tragic sense.

The True Flag is VERY well-written, a page turner, and a bitter-sweet story of what might have been. Despite our history of genocide, slavery, and other well-known depravities, the United States also had some important ideals and democratic principles imbedded in our Constitution - ideals that have inspired others throughout the world, and provided a corrective force to our nation's many missteps. Key among these principles is the idea that government should function by consent of the governed - the people.

When the imperialists won the debate at the end of the 19th century, arguing cynically that brown people were incapable of governing themselves, the American democratic experiment hung in the balance, then went down to defeat. We have McKinley, Teddy Roosevelt, and Henry Cabot Lodge to thank, long before Donald Trump arrived on the scene to trample the remnants.

19 people found this helpfulReport


Mr Oates' Willie

3.0 out of 5 stars Denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotismReviewed in the United States on 17 February 2022
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
The birth of jingoism. If you leave out manifest destiny, the American Indian wars & TX/Mexico.
I would have appreciated a few pages of how this debate continued between the Treaty of Paris 1898 & The treaty of Versailles 1919. I guess the answer is W Wilson & the Hall of Mirrors. Very timely, as 'we' approach Ukrainian conflict.

One person found this helpfulReport


Jim Lester

4.0 out of 5 stars Excellent history of American foreign policyReviewed in the United States on 9 May 2017
Format: KindleVerified Purchase
This is an important and thought-provoking piece of history. Kinzer details the ideas and activities of American political leaders, led by Theodore Roosevelt, who wanted our country to expand America's overseas empire at the beginning of the 20th century. Their efforts were opposed by a group of anti-imperialists led by Mark Twain, who believed America would lose its soul if it seized other countries and tried to govern them.

According to Kinser, the broad outlines of this argument have formed the basis of America's foreign policy discussions for over a hundred years. The book is well written and the closing section on the nation's post-World War II foreign policy is worth the price of the book. I would highly recommend this book to any reader interested in American history or any reader searching for an explanation of our country's recent expansionist foreign policy.

2 people found this helpfulReport


Florian

5.0 out of 5 stars While reading Stephen Kinzer's The True Flag I listened to ...Reviewed in the United States on 27 September 2017
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
While reading Stephen Kinzer's The True Flag I listened to Maurice Ravel's Bolero.
Somehow the music and the events match. The Bolero's incessant drive of sound resembles the powerful push for war and conquest the United States experienced during the years from 1898-1902. As documented in this book, it began with the Spanish-American War and proceeded with establishing an American Empire that included Hawaii, the Philippines, Guam, Cuba, and Puerto Rico.

There is never a shortage of reasonable persons who stand in opposition to U.S. wars of choice, but they seem to drown in the ever increasing crescendos of hypnotic war drums which will dominate across the country. With a current in the American psyche that gravitates toward action, and doing, and getting things done, foreign adventures appear to be tempting. Perhaps the autocratic temperament persists even in democracies, and
finds an outlet in orchestrating war, occupation, and colonial acquisition. For individual men with big egos and even bigger agendas, the processes of democratic government can be too pedestrian and too slow. Kinzer's finely crafted study, for this reader underscored by the forceful music of the Bolero, makes the hazards of such political patterns perfectly clear.

3 people found this helpfulReport


T Richards

2.0 out of 5 stars This was another hit job on America. The author’s unrelenting undermines credibilityReviewed in the United States on 19 July 2025
Format: KindleVerified Purchase
I’m glad I read this book, as I learned much about how deeply divided our country was at the turn of the 20th century regarding how half of the country was adamantly devoted to the principles and the myths of our patriotic split from England, and the other half was pragmatic and bold about America’s role in the world. Aside from the unmistakable bias of the author, which the reader spots after about three pages, an objective perspective comes away that both sides were right in their own ways. My problem with this book was that it was a 300+ page Op Ed. I’m glad it was so short, I couldn’t have taken anymore. Knowing a lot about Roosevelt and the era generally, I found the presentation of facts so one-sided and biased, I had to question the author’s honesty, and his presentation of true facts. His motives were clear. Only the last chapter is there any glimmer of objectivity, but even then, it was drenched with cynical snap judgments condemning US more recent actions abroad in such a simplistic and conclusive manner that any student of history would know ignored the actual nuances and complexities of what was really happening at the time. Some of the cataclysmic causal connections the author can make in one sentence is actually laughable. The short shrift he gives to WWII and the Nazis (0%) is stunning, and blaming the Cold War completely on the American fear of Soviet aggression makes one angry this simplistic “fact” was in the last chapter. Had it been in the preface, it would have saved readers some time. And would have provided some tinder. The latter observation made me research this author, and I was not surprised by what I found. This was a “Hate America” book dressed up like objective reportage. It wasn’t objective in the slightest. Every instance of international suffering is blamed on America’s racist, saber-rattling, and insatiable quest for domination of the weak. Every.Single.One. I must give credit when credit is due. He can really turn a venomous phrase when piously rubbing America’s nose in what he thinks is it’s missteps. It was short. It’s always good when propaganda pamphlets don’t take that long to read. I’m glad I have this woke diatribe in the rear view mirror.

2 people found this helpfulReport


Sixthga

2.0 out of 5 stars Biased "History"Reviewed in the United States on 25 March 2017
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
I will leave comments re Kinzer's knowledge of the political history of the era to others. I will say, and I'm being charitable, that his take on the military history of the Cuban war, especially from the soldiers' perspective, is not his strength. His ignorance shows clearly when he describes U.S. military arms as superior to those of the Spanish. Most American troops, the state volunteers, were armed with antiquated single shot Springfield Trapdoor rifles of the Indian Wars era. U.S. regulares were armed with the modern Krag Jorgensen rifle but, like the Springfield, it fired a black powder cartridge which belched white smoke on firing, giving away U.S. positions. Likewise, U.S. artillery, in short supply in any event, also used black powder propellant making Spanish counter-battery fire accurate and remorseless. Spanish troops were armed with the superior Mauser rifle which fired modern smokeless powder. Spanish artillery, also smokeless, far outmatched that of the Americans. And then there were the modern machine guns behind Spanish barbed-wire. We were using gatling guns, a late Civil War invention. Kinzer shows his true colors when he describes the fighting as an American walk-over with no aspects of bravery or courage involved. Has he not read primary sources and soldiers accounts of the fighting? Brutal. Savage at times. Great bravey was shown by soldiers in both armies. Whatever TR's motivation for going to war, once he was in it he led from the front and demonstrated raw gourage. He led U.S. forces up Kettle Hill on horseback -- the only mounted officer in that charge. It is absolutely amazing that neither he nor his horse were hit. He only dismounted when he encountered wire at the top of the hill. Unfortunately, Kinzer apparently writes with a political agenda and his book suffers for it.

20 people found this helpfulReport


RK

4.0 out of 5 stars Continuing coverageReviewed in the United States on 12 June 2017
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
This is a very good book about an important topic that, as Kinzer mentions, has been and will be debated forever. It is short enough that even a casual interest in American imperialism (especially in Cuba and the Philippines) will get you through to the end. I did think it odd that Twain occupies a space on the cover and in the title but is sparsely found in the text. Roosevelt has a larger role (naturally, as a man of consequence), but Kinzer focuses just as heavily on McKinley, Bryan, and Lodge--all of whom are worthy of discussion, if not as big of booksellers today.

The last chapter of the book departs from the 1898-1902 bulk and draws a continuous line from Roosevelt to Obama with details of many (failed) US foreign escapades. Kinzer is staunchly opposed to intervention but provides ample evidence to support his position.

4 people found this helpfulReport
==
From other countries


michael langsdorf
4.0 out of 5 stars The Genesis of US Hegemony
Reviewed in the United States on 5 February 2017
Format: KindleVerified Purchase
A succinct and quite readable history of the genesis of America's interventionism, beginning with the Spanish-American War in 1898. The author does an excellent job in analyzing the personality clashes and ensuing bitterness between "interventionist" and "non-interventionist" emerging schools of thought in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.


The book inevitably raises the implicit--though never stated--question of what we never seem to learn from past--sometimes well-intentioned--overseas blunders, making one wonder why we never appear to derive any lessons from our own history.


The last 10-15% of the book is a bit polemical, and condenses about 120 of history into a few dozen pages, though the theme (and lesson) is clear.


For those who, like me, were largely unaware of the seminal implications of the Spanish-American War, and the concomitant bloody, merciless conquest of the Philippines, this is well worth reading.
11 people found this helpful
Report


Hrvoje
5.0 out of 5 stars The True Flag of America is Currently Empire
Reviewed in the United States on 13 July 2017
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
Stephen Kinzer has uncovered a story every American citizen must read. If you ever wondered at what point America became an empire, wonder no more. 1898 was the clarion call of empire consecrated with the false flag sinking of the USS Maine in Cuba wrongly blamed on Spain and skirmishes provoked by US soldiers against patriotic rebels in the Philippines.


He painstakingly details the speeches, debates and rhetoric coming out of the imperial and anti-imperial camp. Surprisingly, robber barons such as Andrew Carnegie were vocal anti-imperialists. The scene played out like House of Cards where senators and politicians traded favors in exchange for the "right" vote on the Treaty of Paris which would turn out to be the American Empire's birth certificate.


And the debate is as relevant today as it was in 1898. It is unfortunate that no such debate is currently taking place in the American Empire. Every Kinzer book is a must-read and perhaps this is his best yet!
5 people found this helpful
Report


Cody Popejoy
4.0 out of 5 stars An honest critique of the beginnings of American Imperialism
Reviewed in the United States on 21 November 2018
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
A straightforward and clean read about the beginning of American Imperalism and the principle characters involved. The story pits the American Imperalists, hungry for Cuba and the Philippines against the Anti-Imperalists. Teddy Rosevelt for the former, and Mark Twain for the latter. America had a choice then, to mind their own business, or to go out, violently, in the name of Liberty, and sack other countries who attempted to do just that: liberate themselves. It is an irony that is still fundamental to American foreign policy today, sadly enough. A good read, not to dense, and sheds light on the America we know today.
Report


William J. Hecht
4.0 out of 5 stars An Important Book for Today not just history.
Reviewed in the United States on 3 June 2017
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
An important book covering the beginning of the US's Imperial behavior overseas. it covers the period from the late 1890' through 1902 and includes our taking of Cuba, Puerto Rico and the Philippines as part of the Spanish American war "spoils" plus Hawaii out of greed. The protagonists include TR, McKinley, Cabot Lodge, Mark Twain, Andrew Carnegie and a whole host of US leaders. Much of the discussion of our place in the world played out in a series of discussions nd Congressional actions which have in my reading been largely uncovered. We still live with the questionable legacy today.
One person found this helpful
Report


BobSculpt
4.0 out of 5 stars The Roots of USA Foreign Policy
Reviewed in the United States on 12 March 2017
Format: KindleVerified Purchase
This book explores the evolution of the USA's foreign policy from 1898 to the present.
Among other things it presents a very different, and not appealing, view of Theodore Roosevelt.
It exposes the majority views of Americans as egotistical, racist, holier-than-thou and money-driven,
not only in 1898 but also today. Despite repeated evidence to the contrary, most Americans favor
intervention in other countries, believing it will benefit the US, while repeatedly it entangles us in multiple
problems, creates huge budget problems, and engenders hatred of the USA. Will we ever learn ?
7 people found this helpful
Report


Rkkjr
5.0 out of 5 stars a must read -- how the US went from being a model for the world to a master of imperialism
Reviewed in the United States on 10 May 2017
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
An incredible book detailing the critical points in our history when we 'made a wrong turn' -- The Paris Agreements with Spain where we got Cuba, the Philipines and a few other islands - and how that re-inforced our mission to not rule, but safe and help the lower class peoples of the world find God and Democracy -- And how has that worked out!
Key roles of Teddy Roosevelt and others changed our future. Meanwhile, Mark Twain was railing against expansionism.


I cannot recommend this book more highly and it helps understand why the US is both loved and hated in the world today
3 people found this helpful
Report


Keith Raulli
4.0 out of 5 stars Interesting Perspective
Reviewed in the United States on 28 September 2020
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
Interesting read not sure if many Americans want to admit how the country was founded but that is how it is/was & brought us to where we are now..
Report


KMcKay
4.0 out of 5 stars Not quite good to the last drop
Reviewed in the United States on 5 May 2019
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
This is a superb history of events in the US, Cuba and the Philipines following the end of the Spanish-American War, and I highly recommend it up through Chapter 10. He's wrong on almost every point he makes in Chapter 11.
One person found this helpful
Report


Dr. Doug
5.0 out of 5 stars We Never Learn!
Reviewed in the United States on 26 March 2018
Format: KindleVerified Purchase
A clear & concise review of the development of U.S. foreign policy that led to such disasters as the wars in Vietnam, Iraq, & Afghanistan. Our leaders in Washington keep making the same mistakes because of their hubris & ignorance of history. I would suggest Trump read this book but due to his limited attention span he probably wouldn't make it past the cover. Are wars with Iran & North Korea in our future?
2 people found this helpful
Report


red riding hood
5.0 out of 5 stars A fascinating piece of history -- explains a lot about U.S. foreign policy today
Reviewed in the United States on 15 August 2018
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
This book reads like a novel in the sense that it is quite hard to put down. The characters are very lifelike, because the author has chosen to include parts of speeches and letters, showing the characters' thinking and reasoning on issues of the day. Mr. Kinzer's book about U.S. foreign policy from 1898 onward has added considerably to my understanding of current events. I highly recommend this book.
One person found this helpful
Report
==
rd
5.0 out of 5 stars I absolutely love this book
Reviewed in the United States on 22 June 2018
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
I absolutely love this book! I am giving strong consideration to adding it to my class reading list in the Fall. Not only does Kinzer efficiently lay out America's move toward empire in the late 19th century, he does so in such a way as to allow the reader to see connections in American foreign policy and action throughout the 20th century and into the 21st.
Report


Beth7
5.0 out of 5 stars Who knew?
Reviewed in the United States on 12 February 2019
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
I think Kinzer is a wonderful writer. He brings you back into the scene of the US's fork in the road when the country could have stayed a republic or morphed into an empire. And it was this fateful turn, this choice made by certain elites that eventually contributed a great deal to our eventual loss of democracy.
Report


Steve Schramm
5.0 out of 5 stars it would be good to really consider these points
Reviewed in the United States on 29 March 2017
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
Everything old is new again -- all these arguments are the same ones we are having today (and had after WWII, and Korea, and Vietnam, and...). If you have any interest in our country and how it can or should behave relative to other countries in the world, definitely read this book. I wish we were having a national conversation as we had during these times; it would be good to really consider these points.
One person found this helpful
Report


David L. Pugh
5.0 out of 5 stars A great book and shameful American history.
Reviewed in the United States on 29 April 2017
Format: KindleVerified Purchase
This book is one of two books this past year that affirmed my views on American history in a very negative perspective. The story of our mistreatment and subjugation of the Phillappenes is mind bogging. If you are ashamed of our mistreatment of native Americans you will be double or triply shocked by our treatment of the Philappeno people. Having said that, it is a terrific book and everybody should read it.
2 people found this helpful
Report


HappyManJK
5.0 out of 5 stars A Great Historical Perspective
Reviewed in the United States on 22 March 2017
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
This enlightening book will give pause to everyone who is concerned about the US presence in the world. Carefully researched and brilliantly written, it lays bare the geopolitical track of the US over the last 120 years. It is very informative and sometimes disturbing to face the reality of how the US has used its powerful position in the world. Thought provoking, the way a good history book should be.
One person found this helpful
Report


Robert
5.0 out of 5 stars It stands a great background as this nation once again tackles the issue ...
Reviewed in the United States on 21 July 2017
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
This work covered a period often overlooked by most treatments of US History. It stands a great background as this nation once again tackles the issue of immigration. The attitudes we have regarding our place in the world have deep roots. After reading "The True Flag" my opinion of Teddy Roosevelt is somewhat diminished while my appreciation of Mark Twain was bolstered.
Report


Bryan LeBlanc
4.0 out of 5 stars A must read for perspective on the debate we are ...
Reviewed in the United States on 1 July 2017
Format: KindleVerified Purchase
A must read for perspective on the debate we are still having today about the influence of a relatively young democracy on the rest of the world. A lot of insight into turn-of-the-century politics that you probably haven't seen in many other places.
Report


Thomas Harrison
5.0 out of 5 stars Informative
Reviewed in the United States on 15 January 2019
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
I had to read this book for a university history class. It's well written and a page turner for sure. It shows the history and culture of American imperialism. To intervene or not, was what America was talking about in the late 1800s. Learned a lot, really good book.
Report


curtis purnell
5.0 out of 5 stars America's Fundamental Racist Foreign Policy
Reviewed in the United States on 25 February 2017
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
This a great book. I had no idea of how much my knowledge of US history was lacking. It was always hitting me with new facts that made me think. My ideal vision of the old history was proven wrong, today's politics has nothing on the players in 1890's. Every enlighting a great read
One person found this helpful
Report


Jylene Livengood
5.0 out of 5 stars and overlooked period of history that could be happening today
Reviewed in the United States on 17 April 2017
Format: Audio CDVerified Purchase
Added a great deal to my knowledge of a period of American history that is usually overshadowed by the Civil War and WWII. Well written and topical, because so much of this period of American history set the stage for what we saw in Vietnam and what we see today.
One person found this helpful
Report
==


Trevor Henke
5.0 out of 5 stars Good Read
Reviewed in the United States on 15 February 2021
Format: KindleVerified Purchase
Excellent viewpoint of an apparently older question than I knew. Expertly researched and entertaining in the authors story telling. History does indeed, repeat itself.
Report


D.W.
4.0 out of 5 stars This historical overview of the events leading to America's rise ...
Reviewed in the United States on 28 February 2017
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
This historical overview of the events leading to America's rise as an imperial power, was not as thought provoking as I had hoped. However, it was a good-read.
Report


No
1.0 out of 5 stars For your own mental health, do not read this book.
Reviewed in the United States on 26 September 2019
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
I would give this book negative stars if I could. This book is one of the worst pieces of "literature" I've ever had the displeasure of reading. The author is egregiously pretentious, he jumps around the timeline like a frog on LSD, and the subject material is written in an insultingly boring manner. I have often found myself rereading the same information given in redundant ways. Not to mention, he plugs in praise for the book right at the beginning, stroking his own ego. I wouldn't recommend this book to my worst enemy, as he would shrivel up and die a slow, agonizing death. Animals would turn feral upon gazing at this book. I will burn this as soon as it is convenient for me.
6 people found this helpful
Report


Barbara Turner
4.0 out of 5 stars Wish I had learned all this in school, really needs wide reading
Reviewed in the United States on 14 September 2017
Format: KindleVerified Purchase
I am a history buff of long standing but learned a lot from this book. Serious reading, not for just passing time.
Report


Eric Anderson
5.0 out of 5 stars Essential History
Reviewed in the United States on 18 September 2019
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
Interesting and thought-provoking read to understand Teddy, Twain, and the often times confusing duality of American foreign policy. Wish I would've had access to this book in college.
Report


Jimmer
5.0 out of 5 stars A well written historical account of went on during the ...
Reviewed in the United States on 31 March 2017
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
A well written historical account of went on during the late 1890's in the US, particularly in Washington. Henry Cabot Lodge, Teddy Roosevelt, Mark Twain, McKinley, William Jennings Bryan, Hearst et al. The pros and cons of American intervention.
One person found this helpful
Report


John B. Gibson
1.0 out of 5 stars Worthless
Reviewed in the United States on 25 January 2020
Format: KindleVerified Purchase
I bought this book to learn more about President Roosevelt and Mark Twain. The authors profound bias against the President made that impossible. For example, President Roosevelt was not opposed to Sunday drinking. It was a law that lead to incredible corruption in the NYPD. If it was a law he would enforce it whether he agreed with it or not.
This was nothing more than a diatribe against US foreign interventions. Be that a bad or good idea, it was not the reason I paid for this volume. I may well read some of his other works, that hopefully will be more honestly titled.
4 people found this helpful
Report


A customer
4.0 out of 5 stars Good read!
Reviewed in the United States on 28 April 2017
Format: KindleVerified Purchase
Excellent. It was a deep dive on a subset of Overthrow book. The same theme. Well written.
Report


Vermont
4.0 out of 5 stars A nice review of a period of American History that gets ...
Reviewed in the United States on 10 March 2017
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
Very readable and informative. A nice review of a period of American History that gets little notice.
One person found this helpful
Report


Kindle Customer
4.0 out of 5 stars Four Stars
Reviewed in the United States on 21 October 2017
Format: KindleVerified Purchase
It's an interesting perspective of a time that changed the direction of foreign policy.
Report

===


스티븐 킨저(Stephen Kinzer)의 저서 <The True Flag: Theodore Roosevelt, Mark Twain, and the Birth of American Empire>에 대한 요약과 평론입니다. 요청하신 대로 요약과 평론 본문은 <해라체(반말)>로 작성하였으며, 강조 표시는 별표 대신 꺾쇠 괄호(< >)를 사용하였습니다.

<The True Flag> 요약 및 평론
1. 요약: 1898년, 미국의 영혼을 건 거대한 논쟁
이 책은 미국 역사상 가장 중요한 전환점 중 하나였지만 종종 간과되는 시기, 바로 1898년을 조명한다. 스티븐 킨저는 이 시기를 미국이 <건국 이념인 공화국(Republic)>으로 남을 것인가, 아니면 유럽 열강과 같은 <제국(Empire)>으로 나아갈 것인가를 결정지은 운명의 해로 규정한다. 이야기는 제국주의 확장을 옹호한 테오도어 루즈벨트(Theodore Roosevelt)와 이에 맞서 미국의 반식민지 전통을 수호하려 했던 마크 트웨인(Mark Twain)이라는 두 거인의 대립을 중심으로 전개된다.

<제국의 탄생: 루즈벨트와 카봇 로지> 19세기 말, 미국은 서부 개척을 완료하고 내부적으로 산업화의 정점에 달해 있었다. 당시 테오도어 루즈벨트와 그의 정치적 동반자 헨리 카봇 로지 상원의원은 미국이 위대해지기 위해서는 국경 밖으로 눈을 돌려야 한다고 믿었다. 그들에게 <팽창>은 곧 국가의 활력이자 남성성의 증명이었다. 이들은 언론 재벌 윌리엄 랜돌프 허스트의 선정적인 보도("옐로 저널리즘")를 등에 업고 스페인 제국이 지배하던 쿠바, 푸에르토리코, 필리핀에 개입할 명분을 쌓았다. 1898년 메인(Maine)호 폭발 사건은 이들에게 완벽한 전쟁의 구실을 제공했고, 순식간에 벌어진 미-서 전쟁(Spanish-American War)에서의 승리는 미국을 단숨에 세계 무대의 중심에 올려놓았다.

<저항의 목소리: 마크 트웨인과 반제국주의 연맹> 전쟁이 승리로 끝나자 쟁점은 <전리품 처리>로 옮겨갔다. 미국이 필리핀, 괌, 푸에르토리코를 합병하고 식민지로 삼아야 하는가? 이때 마크 트웨인을 필두로 앤드류 카네기, 윌리엄 제임스, 칼 슈르츠 등 당대의 지성인과 거부들이 뭉쳐 <미국 반제국주의 연맹(American Anti-Imperialist League)>을 결성했다. 마크 트웨인은 특유의 날카로운 풍자로 미국의 위선을 공격했다. 그는 "우리는 깃발의 줄무늬를 검게 칠하고 별을 해골로 바꿔야 한다"며, 피지배자의 동의 없는 통치는 미국 독립선언서의 정신을 정면으로 위배하는 것이라고 주장했다. 카네기는 필리핀의 독립을 사기 위해 미국 정부에 개인 재산으로 2천만 달러를 기부하겠다고 제안할 정도로 필사적이었다. 이들에게 제국주의는 민주주의와 양립할 수 없는 독약이었다.

<운명의 상원 표결과 필리핀의 비극> 책의 하이라이트는 1899년 파리 조약 비준을 둘러싼 상원에서의 치열한 논쟁이다. 조약 비준은 곧 필리핀 합병을 의미했다. 격렬한 토론 끝에 제국주의 진영은 단 <한 표 차이>로 비준안을 통과시켰다. 이 한 표가 미국의 미래를 영원히 바꿨다. 결과는 참혹했다. 스페인으로부터의 해방을 기대했던 필리핀 사람들은 미군을 새로운 침략자로 규정하고 저항했다. 뒤이어 벌어진 필리핀-미국 전쟁은 잔혹했다. 미군은 고문(물고문 등)과 학살을 자행했고, 이는 훗날 베트남이나 이라크에서 벌어질 일들의 불길한 예고편이 되었다. 루즈벨트는 이를 "문명을 위한 과업"이라 포장했지만, 킨저는 이를 명백한 침략 전쟁이자 미국의 도덕적 타락의 시작으로 묘사한다.

<결말: 닫히지 않은 문> 루즈벨트가 대통령이 되면서 제국주의적 팽창은 미국의 공식 외교 노선으로 굳어졌다. 킨저는 책의 말미에서 1898년의 결정이 20세기를 넘어 21세기 미국의 개입주의적 외교 정책(레짐 체인지, 중동 전쟁 등)으로 이어지는 연결고리임을 강조한다. 마크 트웨인은 비록 정치적 대결에서는 패배했지만, 그의 경고는 오늘날까지 유효한 예언으로 남아 있다.

2. 평론: 잊혀진 논쟁의 현재적 울림
스티븐 킨저의 <The True Flag>는 단순한 역사서가 아니다. 이것은 오늘날 미국이 겪고 있는 외교적 딜레마의 기원을 추적하는 <계보학적 보고서>다. 저자는 120년 전의 사건을 통해 "미국은 세계 경찰이어야 하는가, 아니면 모범적인 공화국으로 남아야 하는가?"라는, 여전히 해결되지 않은 질문을 던진다.

<역사적 서술의 힘과 균형> 킨저의 가장 큰 장점은 탁월한 스토리텔링이다. 그는 건조한 외교사를 다루면서도 루즈벨트의 폭발적인 에너지와 트웨인의 냉소적인 유머를 대비시켜 마치 소설처럼 생동감 있게 그려낸다. 특히 헨리 카봇 로지와 윌리엄 제임스 같은 조연들의 사상적 배경을 깊이 있게 다룸으로써, 이 논쟁이 단순한 영토 확장의 문제가 아니라 <미국의 정체성>을 둘러싼 철학적 투쟁이었음을 설득력 있게 보여준다. 다만, 저자의 시각은 명확히 반제국주의 진영에 기울어 있다. 루즈벨트는 종종 호전적이고 인종차별적인 인물로 묘사되는 반면, 반제국주의 연맹의 인사들은 도덕적 선지자로 그려진다. 물론 당시의 기록들이 루즈벨트의 제국주의적 야망을 뒷받침하지만, 당시의 국제 정세(유럽 열강의 아시아 침탈 등) 속에서 미국이 고립주의를 고수했을 때의 현실적 위험성에 대한 분석은 상대적으로 적다는 점은 아쉬움으로 남는다.

<현대 미국 외교 정책에 대한 시사점> 이 책의 진정한 가치는 <현재성>에 있다. 킨저는 1899년 필리핀에서 자행된 '물고문'이 21세기 대테러 전쟁에서 재연되는 모습을 지적하며, 잘못 끼워진 첫 단추가 어떻게 국가의 DNA를 변형시켰는지 고발한다. "자유를 확산한다"는 명분으로 행해지는 무력 개입이 실제로는 얼마나 반미 감정을 부추기고 불안정을 초래했는지에 대한 통찰은 날카롭다. 책은 독자에게 묻는다. 트웨인이 경고했던 <해외 개입의 늪>은 과연 피할 수 없는 숙명이었는가? 킨저는 1898년의 결정이 필연이 아니었음을, 단 한 표 차이로 갈린 우연의 산물이었음을 강조하며 역사의 가변성을 역설한다. 이는 지금이라도 미국이 '진정한 깃발(True Flag)'—즉, 제국이 아닌 공화국의 깃발—을 되찾을 수 있다는 희망 섞인 제언이기도 하다.

<총평> <The True Flag>는 미국 패권주의의 기원을 이해하고자 하는 사람들에게 필수적인 텍스트다. 특히 루즈벨트라는 영웅적 신화 뒤에 가려진 폭력성과, 마크 트웨인이라는 문학적 거장이 남긴 정치적 유산을 재조명한 점은 매우 흥미롭다. 이 책은 과거를 다루지만, 그 칼끝은 명백히 현재의 워싱턴을 겨누고 있다. 미국의 힘이 세계를 향해 뻗어나갈 때마다, 우리는 루즈벨트의 야망과 트웨인의 양심 사이에서 여전히 위태로운 줄타기를 하고 있음을 이 책은 웅변한다.

이 책에서 다루는 마크 트웨인의 반제국주의 연설문 중 인상 깊은 구절이나, 당시 필리핀 전쟁의 구체적인 상황에 대해 더 궁금한 점이 있으신가요?
===

===

<한국어: 1,000단어 내외 요약+평론>

<1) 요약>

스티븐 킨저의 <The True Flag: Theodore Roosevelt, Mark Twain, and the Birth of American Empire>(초판 2017년 1월)은 “미국 제국의 탄생”을 1898년 전후의 짧지만 निर्ण정적인 시기에 집중해 재구성한 책이다. 핵심 무대는 스페인-미국 전쟁(1898)과 그 결과로 이어진 필리핀 점령·전쟁, 그리고 같은 시기에 미국이 쿠바·푸에르토리코·괌·하와이를 사실상 지배권 아래 두게 되는 급격한 팽창이다. 한 서평은 이 시기를 “55일 남짓한 기간” 동안 미국이 여러 해외 영토/지배권을 획득한 도약의 시간으로 요약한다.

킨저는 이 ‘팽창의 선택’을 단순한 외교 이벤트가 아니라, 이후 한 세기 넘게 이어지는 미국 대외정책의 원형(프로토타입)으로 본다. 다시 말해 “미국이 해외에 개입해야 하는가/개입할 권리가 있는가/개입이 미국을 더 강하게 만드는가”라는 오늘의 논쟁이 사실상 1898년 무렵에 처음 대중정치의 중심 의제로 등장했고, 그때 형성된 논리·정서·언론 프레임이 반복 재생산된다고 주장한다.

책의 서사는 두 상징적 인물을 중심축으로 삼는다. 테오도어 루스벨트는 “해외로 힘을 투사하는 미국”을 대표하는 제국주의·개입주의의 상징으로, 마크 트웨인은 반제국주의(anti-imperialism) 진영의 가장 날카로운 대중적 목소리로 배치된다. 킨저는 이 둘을 ‘미국의 영혼을 둘러싼 논쟁’의 극적인 대립쌍으로 설정해, 동시대 미국 사회가 어떤 언어로 제국을 정당화/비판했는지를 보여준다.

그러나 실제 내용은 ‘루스벨트 vs 트웨인’의 인물전만이 아니다. 킨저는 반제국주의 진영이 매우 넓고 이질적 연합이었음을 강조한다. 예컨대 기업가 앤드루 카네기, 노동운동 지도자 새뮤얼 곰퍼스, 사회개혁가 제인 애덤스, 교육자 부커 T. 워싱턴, 정치인들까지 섞여 있었고, 동기는 인종·계급·정당·헌정 원리에 따라 제각각이었다는 점을 보여준다. 즉 “제국에 반대했다”는 한 문장으로 묶이지만, 그 내부는 ‘도덕적 반대’, ‘헌법적 반대’, ‘경제적·계급적 이해’, ‘인종/시민권 문제의 연장선’ 등 여러 층위로 분열돼 있었다는 것이다.

책의 중요한 장면은 1899년 파리조약 비준(필리핀 획득이 확정되는 고비) 같은 정치적 순간들, 그리고 필리핀 전쟁이 ‘해방’ 담론과 결합해 어떻게 전개됐는가 하는 지점이다. 한 비평은 킨저가 조약 비준을 고조된 드라마의 순간으로 다루며, 제국주의가 “미국의 운명”이 되는 갈림길을 보여준다고 지적한다.

<2) 평론: 강점>

  1. <1898년을 ‘원형’으로 읽는 설득력>
    이 책의 가장 큰 미덕은 “미국의 제국은 2차대전 후 갑자기 생긴 게 아니라, 1898년 전후에 이미 논리·감정·정치기술이 준비됐다”는 관점을 대중적 서사로 설득한다는 점이다. 그래서 오늘의 해외개입 논쟁(인도주의 개입, 반테러 전쟁, ‘자유’ 수출 같은 언어)이 어디서 왔는지 역사적 계보를 잡는 데 유용하다.

  2. <반제국주의를 ‘정치적 전통’으로 복원>
    미국 내 반제국주의가 주변적 일탈이 아니라, 실제로 강력한 사회적 흐름이었음을 복원한다. “미국은 늘 제국주의였다/늘 아니었다” 같은 단정 대신, 초기에 이미 치열한 논쟁과 대안적 상상력이 존재했음을 보여주며, 그 전통이 후대에 반복 소환된다는 관찰은 현재에도 의미가 있다.

  3. <읽히는 역사: 인물·언론·정치의 결합>
    킨저는 정치 엘리트의 결정만이 아니라 언론, 대중정서, ‘애국’의 동원 방식이 어떻게 팽창정책을 가능케 했는지 서사적으로 엮는다. “정책의 탄생”을 제도·담론·감정정치의 결합으로 그려 대중서로서 힘이 있다.

<3) 평론: 한계와 비판적 독서 포인트>

  1. <루스벨트·트웨인 ‘대립쌍’의 과잉 상징화>
    몇몇 서평이 지적하듯, 부제는 두 인물의 ‘선명한 대결’을 예고하지만 실제 책은 훨씬 더 많은 인물·구조를 다룬다. 그 자체로는 장점이지만, 동시에 루스벨트=제국, 트웨인=공화국의 순수성 같은 상징화는 복합성을 단순화할 위험도 있다.

  2. <저자의 ‘영웅/악역’ 프레이밍>
    킨저가 누구를 더 설득력 있게 그리는지는 비교적 분명하다는 비판이 있다(루스벨트를 거칠게 묘사하고, 트웨인/반제국주의자를 더 호의적으로 그린다는 지적). 이런 서사적 선택은 독서 몰입을 주지만, 독자가 “도덕극”으로만 읽게 만들 수도 있다.

  3. <현지(필리핀·쿠바 등) 주체성의 비중>
    미국 내부 논쟁을 중심으로 서술하다 보니, 제국의 대상이 된 사회들의 내부 정치·계급·민족·지역 갈등, 그리고 그들의 능동적 전략이 상대적으로 ‘배경’이 되기 쉽다. 필리핀 전쟁을 읽을 때는 필리핀 민족운동/혁명사의 관점으로 보완하는 편이 좋다(킨저의 프레임이 미국의 자기성찰에 강한 만큼, 현지 사회의 다층적 역학은 추가 독서가 필요).

<4) 한 줄 결론>

<The True Flag>(2017)는 “미국이 제국이 될 것인가”가 1898년 무렵 이미 격렬하게 싸워진 문제였음을 보여주며, 루스벨트와 트웨인을 ‘상징적 기둥’으로 삼아 오늘의 개입 논쟁까지 연결하는 강한 문제제기형 역사서다. 다만 저자의 규범적 기울기와 상징화의 단순화를 의식하면서, 현지사의 시각을 더해 읽으면 가장 좋은 책이다.


<English: ~900–1,000 words summary + critique>

<1) Summary>

Stephen Kinzer’s <The True Flag: Theodore Roosevelt, Mark Twain, and the Birth of the American Empire> (published 2017) revisits the late-1890s moment when the United States abruptly shifted from a continental republic to an overseas power. Kinzer frames the summer of 1898 and its immediate aftermath as a hinge: within a strikingly short span, the U.S. established control or decisive influence over places such as Cuba, Puerto Rico, Guam, Hawai‘i, and—most fatefully—the Philippines. A contemporary review captures the pace of this transformation by noting how quickly the U.S. “leaped” into overseas empire around 1900.

The book’s core argument is genealogical: the central American debate about intervention—whether the nation should project power abroad, annex territory, and remake foreign societies—was born in this era, not in the Cold War or after 9/11. Kinzer treats 1898 as the prototype of recurring policy scripts: moralized justifications, media-driven enthusiasm, a rhetoric of liberation, and the promise of quick victory—followed by complicated occupations and wars that demand more coercion than Americans initially admit.

Kinzer structures the narrative around two emblematic figures. Theodore Roosevelt embodies the assertive, expansionist impulse: empire as a measure of national vigor and destiny. Mark Twain becomes the era’s most memorable anti-imperialist voice, associated with the Anti-Imperialist League and with the claim that ruling others would betray the republic’s founding ideals. Multiple summaries of the book highlight this Roosevelt–Twain pairing as Kinzer’s way of dramatizing the argument over America’s identity.

Yet the book is not merely a two-man duel. Kinzer emphasizes that anti-imperialism was a broad, internally diverse coalition. As one detailed review notes, it ranged from industrialist Andrew Carnegie to labor leader Samuel Gompers, reformer Jane Addams, educator Booker T. Washington, and major politicians—people who disagreed on many domestic issues but converged (temporarily) on resisting overseas conquest and annexation. Kinzer uses this variety to show that opposition to empire was not a fringe posture; it was a serious political force with multiple rationales—constitutional, moral, economic, and racial.

A pivotal episode is the U.S. decision to keep the Philippines after defeating Spain. In Kinzer’s telling, the fight over annexation—and the subsequent Philippine-American War—exposed the tension between a liberator narrative and the realities of suppressing a nationalist movement. Another review notes how Kinzer treats the ratification of the Treaty of Paris (1899) as a high-drama political turning point that effectively confirmed the imperial path.

<2) Strengths>

  1. <A clear origin story for recurring intervention debates>

The book’s major contribution is to make “intervention vs restraint” feel like a long-running American argument with an identifiable starting point. By anchoring today’s disputes in 1898-era rhetoric and politics, Kinzer gives readers a historical template for recognizing how moral language, strategic ambition, and domestic politics combine in moments of expansion.

  1. <Recovery of an American anti-imperial tradition>

Kinzer treats anti-imperialism as a substantial tradition rather than a footnote. The emphasis matters because it complicates simplistic national self-stories (“America is naturally anti-empire” or “America is inevitably empire”). Book-review aggregations likewise describe the work as tracing the roots of an anti-imperial tradition that continues to resurface.

  1. <Accessible political history>

Kinzer writes in a narrative style—people, arguments, institutions, press dynamics—making the period readable for non-specialists. That readability is not trivial: it helps the reader see how empires are made through persuasion and coalition-building, not only through battlefield victories.

<3) Limitations and critical reading points>

  1. <The Roosevelt–Twain frame can oversimplify>
    Some reviewers argue that the subtitle promises a sharper focus on Roosevelt and Twain than the book ultimately delivers; it ranges widely across actors and episodes. More importantly, turning the debate into a symbolic morality play (Roosevelt as empire, Twain as republic) risks flattening ambiguities in both camps and can understate the structural forces—party competition, economic interests, racial ideology—that shaped outcomes.

  2. <Normative tilt and “heroes vs villains” energy>
    Critical reviews suggest Kinzer’s sympathies are clear and that Roosevelt is sometimes portrayed harshly, while anti-imperialists receive more generous treatment. A strong point of view can sharpen the narrative, but readers should separate (a) factual reconstruction from (b) evaluative framing.

  3. <Local agency in colonized societies may recede>

Because the book is centered on American politics and American identity, the internal dynamics of places like the Philippines can become secondary. For a fuller picture, Kinzer pairs well with works that foreground Filipino political factions, social structures, and nationalist strategy—so the conflict is not read only as an American moral crisis.

<4) Bottom line>

<The True Flag> (2017) is a persuasive, highly readable account of how the U.S. “found” empire around 1898—and how, at the very moment of expansion, Americans fought fiercely over whether conquest would corrupt the republic. It works best as a vivid origin story and a prompt for self-critique, while benefiting from supplementary reading that centers the colonized societies and complicates the book’s symbolic hero-villain framing.

===

===




No comments:

Post a Comment